From 48eb11917fa50051226b11de1c99759312d5cc80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matt Caswell Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2023 16:52:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Ensure that EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY is checked even in leaf certs Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf cert was bad. Fixes: CVE-2023-0465 Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20588) Signed-off-by: code4lala --- crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c index b18489f67f..861a1ae732 100644 --- a/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c +++ b/crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c @@ -1649,18 +1649,25 @@ static int check_policy(X509_STORE_CTX *ctx) } /* Invalid or inconsistent extensions */ if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_INVALID) { - int i; + int i, cbcalled = 0; /* Locate certificates with bad extensions and notify callback. */ - for (i = 1; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { + for (i = 0; i < sk_X509_num(ctx->chain); i++) { X509 *x = sk_X509_value(ctx->chain, i); if (!(x->ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID_POLICY)) continue; + cbcalled = 1; if (!verify_cb_cert(ctx, x, i, X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION)) return 0; } + if (!cbcalled) { + /* Should not be able to get here */ + X509err(X509_F_CHECK_POLICY, ERR_R_INTERNAL_ERROR); + return 0; + } + /* The callback ignored the error so we return success */ return 1; } if (ret == X509_PCY_TREE_FAILURE) { -- GitLab