- 30 3月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. This matches a similar API for the client side, and keeps ULP fingers out the of the GSS mech switch. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Acked-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The NFSv4 SECINFO operation returns a list of security flavors that the server supports for a particular share. An NFSv4 client is supposed to pick a pseudoflavor it supports that corresponds to one of the flavors returned by the server. GSS flavors in this list have a GSS tuple that identify a specific GSS pseudoflavor. Currently our client ignores the GSS tuple's "qop" value. A matching pseudoflavor is chosen based only on the OID and service value. So far this omission has not had much effect on Linux. The NFSv4 protocol currently supports only one qop value: GSS_C_QOP_DEFAULT, also known as zero. However, if an NFSv4 server happens to return something other than zero in the qop field, our client won't notice. This could cause the client to behave in incorrect ways that could have security implications. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
A SECINFO reply may contain flavors whose kernel module is not yet loaded by the client's kernel. A new RPC client API, called rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor(), is introduced to do proper checking for support of a security flavor. When this API is invoked, the RPC client now tries to load the module for each flavor first before performing the "is this supported?" check. This means if a module is available on the client, but has not been loaded yet, it will be loaded and registered automatically when the SECINFO reply is processed. The new API can take a full GSS tuple (OID, QoP, and service). Previously only the OID and service were considered. nfs_find_best_sec() is updated to verify all flavors requested in a SECINFO reply, including AUTH_NULL and AUTH_UNIX. Previously these two flavors were simply assumed to be supported without consulting the RPC client. Note that the replaced version of nfs_find_best_sec() can return RPC_AUTH_MAXFLAVOR if the server returns a recognized OID but an unsupported "service" value. nfs_find_best_sec() now returns RPC_AUTH_UNIX in this case. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The NFSv4 SECINFO procedure returns a list of security flavors. Any GSS flavor also has a GSS tuple containing an OID, a quality-of- protection value, and a service value, which specifies a particular GSS pseudoflavor. For simplicity and efficiency, I'd like to return each GSS tuple from the NFSv4 SECINFO XDR decoder and pass it straight into the RPC client. Define a data structure that is visible to both the NFS client and the RPC client. Take structure and field names from the relevant standards to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The gss_mech_list_pseudoflavors() function provides a list of currently registered GSS pseudoflavors. This list does not include any non-GSS flavors that have been registered with the RPC client. nfs4_find_root_sec() currently adds these extra flavors by hand. Instead, nfs4_find_root_sec() should be looking at the set of flavors that have been explicitly registered via rpcauth_register(). And, other areas of code will soon need the same kind of list that contains all flavors the kernel currently knows about (see below). Rather than cloning the open-coded logic in nfs4_find_root_sec() to those new places, introduce a generic RPC function that generates a full list of registered auth flavors and pseudoflavors. A new rpc_authops method is added that lists a flavor's pseudoflavors, if it has any. I encountered an interesting module loader loop when I tried to get the RPC client to invoke gss_mech_list_pseudoflavors() by name. This patch is a pre-requisite for server trunking discovery, and a pre-requisite for fixing up the in-kernel mount client to do better automatic security flavor selection. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bryan Schumaker 提交于
When sec=<something> is not presented as a mount option, we should attempt to determine what security flavor the server is using. Signed-off-by: NBryan Schumaker <bjschuma@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 15 5月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Again, we can deadlock if the memory reclaim triggers a writeback that requires a rpcsec_gss credential lookup. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> -
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The text based upcall now indicates which Kerberos encryption types are supported by the kernel rpcsecgss code. This is used by gssd to determine which encryption types it should attempt to negotiate when creating a context with a server. The server principal's database and keytab encryption types are what limits what it should negotiate. Therefore, its keytab should be created with only the enctypes listed by this file. Currently we support des-cbc-crc, des-cbc-md4 and des-cbc-md5 Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
This patch removes CVS keywords that weren't updated for a long time from comments. Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Add a new field to the svc_rqst structure to record the pseudoflavor that the request was made with. For now we record the pseudoflavor but don't use it for anything. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: N"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Also do the same for gss_api operation tables. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 04 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Uwe Zeisberger 提交于
Many files include the filename at the beginning, serveral used a wrong one. Signed-off-by: NUwe Zeisberger <Uwe_Zeisberger@digi.com> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 27 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Mohr 提交于
acquired (aquired) contiguous (contigious) successful (succesful, succesfull) surprise (suprise) whether (weather) some other misspellings Signed-off-by: NAndreas Mohr <andi@lisas.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 19 10月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Not only are the qop parameters that are passed around throughout the gssapi unused by any currently implemented mechanism, but there appears to be some doubt as to whether they will ever be used. Let's just kill them off for now. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Add support for privacy to generic gss-api code. This is dead code until we have both a mechanism that supports privacy and code in the client or server that uses it. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-