printk and friends can now format bitmaps using '%*pb[l]'.  cpumask
and nodemask also provide cpumask_pr_args() and nodemask_pr_args()
respectively which can be used to generate the two printf arguments
necessary to format the specified cpu/nodemask.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

bitmap and its derivatives such as cpumask and nodemask currently only
provide formatting functions which put the output string into the
provided buffer; however, how long this buffer should be isn't defined
anywhere and given that some of these bitmaps can be too large to be
formatted into an on-stack buffer it users sometimes are unnecessarily
forced to come up with creative solutions and compromises for the
buffer just to printk these bitmaps.

There have been a couple different attempts at making this easier.

1. Way back, PeterZ tried printk '%pb' extension with the precision
   for bit width - '%.*pb'.  This was intuitive and made sense but
   unfortunately triggered a compile warning about using precision
   for a pointer.

   http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1336577562.2527.58.camel@twins

2. I implemented bitmap_pr_cont[_list]() and its wrappers for cpumask
   and nodemask.  This works but PeterZ pointed out that pr_cont's
   tendency to produce broken lines when multiple CPUs are printing is
   bothering considering the usages.

   http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1418226774-30215-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org

So, this patch is another attempt at teaching printk and friends how
to print bitmaps.  It's almost identical to what PeterZ tried with
precision but it uses the field width for the number of bits instead
of precision.  The format used is '%*pb[l]', with the optional
trailing 'l' specifying list format instead of hex masks.

This is a valid format string and doesn't trigger compiler warnings;
however, it does make it impossible to specify output field width when
printing bitmaps.  I think this is an acceptable trade-off given how
much easier it makes printing bitmaps and that we don't have any
in-kernel user which is using the field width specification.  If any
future user wants to use field width with a bitmap, it'd have to
format the bitmap into a string buffer and then print that buffer with
width spec, which isn't different from how it should be done now.

This patch implements bitmap[_list]_string() which are called from the
vsprintf pointer() formatting function.  The implementation is mostly
identical to bitmap_scn[list]printf() except that the output is
performed in the vsprintf way.  These functions handle formatting into
too small buffers and sprintf() family of functions report the correct
overrun output length.

bitmap_scn[list]printf() are now thin wrappers around scnprintf().
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The first of these conditionals is completely redundant: If k == lim-1, we
must have off==0, so the second conditional will also trigger and then it
wouldn't matter if upper had some high bits set.  But the second
conditional is in fact also redundant, since it only serves to clear out
some high-order "don't care" bits of dst, about which no guarantee is
made.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We can shift the bits from lower and upper into place before assembling
dst[k + off]; moving the shift of lower into the branch where we already
know that rem is non-zero allows us to remove a conditional.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

gcc can generate slightly better code for stuff like "nbits %
BITS_PER_LONG" when it knows nbits is not negative.  Since negative size
bitmaps or shift amounts don't make sense, change these parameters of
bitmap_shift_right to unsigned.

If off >= lim (which requires shift >= nbits), k is initialized with a
large positive value, but since I've let k continue to be signed, the loop
will never run and dst will be zeroed as expected.  Inside the loop, k is
guaranteed to be non-negative, so the fact that it is promoted to unsigned
in the various expressions it appears in is harmless.

Also use "shift" and "nbits" consistently for the parameter names.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If left is 0, we can just let mask be ~0UL, so that anding with it is a
no-op.  Conveniently, BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK provides precisely what we
need, and we can eliminate left.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

If the condition k==lim-1 is true, we must have off == 0 (otherwise, k
could never become that big).  But in that case we have upper == 0 and
hence dst[k] == (src[k] & mask) >> rem.  Since mask consists of a
consecutive range of bits starting from the LSB, anding dst[k] with mask
is a no-op.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We can shift the bits from lower and upper into place before assembling
dst[k]; moving the shift of upper into the branch where we already know
that rem is non-zero allows us to remove a conditional.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

I've previously changed the nbits parameter of most bitmap_* functions to
unsigned; now it is bitmap_shift_{left,right}'s turn.  This alone saves
some .text, but while at it I found that there were a few other things one
could do.  The end result of these seven patches is

  $ scripts/bloat-o-meter /tmp/bitmap.o.{old,new}
  add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 0/-328 (-328)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  __bitmap_shift_right                         384     226    -158
  __bitmap_shift_left                          306     136    -170

and less importantly also a smaller stack footprint

  $ stack-o-meter.pl master bitmap
  file                 function                       old  new  delta
  lib/bitmap.o         __bitmap_shift_right             24    8  -16
  lib/bitmap.o         __bitmap_shift_left              24    0  -24

For each pair of 0 <= shift <= nbits <= 256 I've tested the end result
with a few randomly filled src buffers (including garbage beyond nbits),
in each case verifying that the shift {left,right}-most bits of dst are
zero and the remaining nbits-shift bits correspond to src, so I'm fairly
confident I didn't screw up.  That hasn't stopped me from being wrong
before, though.

This patch (of 7):

gcc can generate slightly better code for stuff like "nbits %
BITS_PER_LONG" when it knows nbits is not negative.  Since negative size
bitmaps or shift amounts don't make sense, change these parameters of
bitmap_shift_right to unsigned.

The expressions involving "lim - 1" are still ok, since if lim is 0 the
loop is never executed.

Also use "shift" and "nbits" consistently for the parameter names.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

On little-endian, there's no reason to have an extra, presumably less
efficient, way of copying a bitmap.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Make the prototype of bitmap_copy_le the same as bitmap_copy's.  All other
bitmap_* functions take unsigned long* parameters; there's no reason this
should be special.

The only current user is the static inline uwb_mas_bm_copy_le, which
already does the void* laundering, so the end users can pass their u8 or
__le32 buffers without a cast.

Furthermore, this allows us to simply let bitmap_copy_le be an alias for
bitmap_copy on little-endian; see next patch.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Also, rename bits to nbits. Both changes for consistency with other
bitmap_* functions.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Make the return value and the ord and nbits parameters of
bitmap_ord_to_pos unsigned.

Also, simplify the implementation and as a side effect make the result
fully defined, returning nbits for ord >= weight, in analogy with what
find_{first,next}_bit does.  This is a better sentinel than the former
("unofficial") 0.  No current users are affected by this change.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The ordinal of a set bit is simply the number of set bits before it;
counting those doesn't need to be done one bit at a time.  While at it,
update the parameters to unsigned int.

It is not completely unthinkable that gcc would see pos as compile-time
constant 0 in one of the uses of bitmap_pos_to_ord.  Since the static
inline frontend bitmap_weight doesn't handle nbits==0 correctly (it would
behave exactly as if nbits==BITS_PER_LONG), use __bitmap_weight.

Alternatively, the last line could be spelled bitmap_weight(buf, pos+1)-1,
but this is simpler.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Change the sz and nbits parameters of bitmap_fold to unsigned int for
consistency with other bitmap_* functions, and to save another few bytes
in the generated code.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix kerneldoc]
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Change the nbits parameter of bitmap_onto to unsigned int for consistency
with other bitmap_* functions.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Add a bitmap_find_next_zero_area_off() function which works like
bitmap_find_next_zero_area() function except it allows an offset to be
specified when alignment is checked.  This lets caller request a bit such
that its number plus the offset is aligned according to the mask.

[gregory.0xf0@gmail.com: Retrieved from https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/6254/ and updated documentation]
Signed-off-by: NMichal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com>
Signed-off-by: NKyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NGregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Many sysfs *_show function use cpu{list,mask}_scnprintf to copy cpumap
to the buffer aligned to PAGE_SIZE, append '\n' and '\0' to return null
terminated buffer with newline.

This patch creates a new helper function cpumap_print_to_pagebuf in
cpumask.h using newly added bitmap_print_to_pagebuf and consolidates
most of those sysfs functions using the new helper function.
Signed-off-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Suggested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: N"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

If __bitmap_shift_left() or __bitmap_shift_right() are asked to shift by
a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG, they will try to shift a long value by
BITS_PER_LONG bits which is undefined.  Change the functions to avoid
the undefined shift.

Coverity id: 1192175
Coverity id: 1192174
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This patch fix spelling typo found in DocBook/kernel-api.xml.
It is because the file is generated from the source comments,
I have to fix the comments in source codes.
Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Apparently, bitmap_andnot is supposed to return whether the new bitmap
is empty.  But it didn't take potential garbage bits in the last word
into account.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Apparently, bitmap_and is supposed to return whether the new bitmap is
empty.  But it didn't take potential garbage bits in the last word into
account.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__reg_op(..., REG_OP_ALLOC) always returns 0, so we might as well use that
and save an instruction.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Changing the pos parameter of __reg_op to unsigned allows the compiler
to generate slightly smaller and simpler code.  Also update its callers
bitmap_*_region to receive and pass unsigned int.  The return types of
bitmap_find_free_region and bitmap_allocate_region are still int to
allow a negative error code to be returned.  An int is certainly capable
of representing any realistic return value.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

A few lines above, it was stated that positions for non-set bits are
mapped to -1, which is obviously also what the code does.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We want len to be the index of the first '\n', or the length of the
string if there is no newline.  This is a good example of the usefulness
of strchrnul().  Use that instead, thus eliminating a branch and a call
to strlen().
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "start" is non-negative.

Also, use the names "start" and "len" for the two parameters for
consistency with bitmap_set.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "start" is non-negative.

Also, use the names "start" and "len" for the two parameters in both
header file and implementation, instead of the previous mix.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative.  Since no-one passes a negative
bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.

I didn't change the return type, since that might change the semantics
of some expression containing a call to bitmap_weight(). Certainly an
int is capable of holding the result.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative.  Since no-one passes a negative
bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative.  Since no-one passes a negative
bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This change is only for consistency with the changes to the other
bitmap_* functions; it doesn't change the size of the generated code:
inside BITS_TO_LONGS there is a sizeof(long), which causes bits to be
interpreted as unsigned anyway.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Since the extra bits are "don't care", there is no reason to mask the
last word to the used bits when complementing.  This shaves off yet a
few bytes.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative.  Since no-one passes a negative
bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative.  Since no-one passes a negative
bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative.  Since no-one passes a negative
bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Many functions in lib/bitmap.c start with an expression such as lim =
bits/BITS_PER_LONG.  Since bits has type (signed) int, and since gcc
cannot know that it is in fact non-negative, it generates worse code
than it could.  These patches, mostly consisting of changing various
parameters to unsigned, gives a slight overall code reduction:

  add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 8/16 up/down: 251/-414 (-163)
  function                                     old     new   delta
  tick_device_uses_broadcast                   335     425     +90
  __irq_alloc_descs                            498     554     +56
  __bitmap_andnot                               73     115     +42
  __bitmap_and                                  70     101     +31
  bitmap_weight                                  -      11     +11
  copy_hugetlb_page_range                      752     762     +10
  follow_hugetlb_page                          846     854      +8
  hugetlb_init                                1415    1417      +2
  hugetlb_nrpages_setup                        130     131      +1
  hugetlb_add_hstate                           377     376      -1
  bitmap_allocate_region                        82      80      -2
  select_task_rq_fair                         2202    2191     -11
  hweight_long                                  66      55     -11
  __reg_op                                     230     219     -11
  dm_stats_message                            2849    2833     -16
  bitmap_parselist                              92      74     -18
  __bitmap_weight                              115      97     -18
  __bitmap_subset                              153     129     -24
  __bitmap_full                                128     104     -24
  __bitmap_empty                               120      96     -24
  bitmap_set                                   179     149     -30
  bitmap_clear                                 185     155     -30
  __bitmap_equal                               136     105     -31
  __bitmap_intersects                          148     108     -40
  __bitmap_complement                          109      67     -42
  tick_device_setup_broadcast_func.isra         81       -     -81

[The increases in __bitmap_and{,not} are due to bug fixes 17/18,18/18.
No idea why bitmap_weight suddenly appears.] While 163 bytes treewide is
insignificant, I believe the bitmap functions are often called with
locks held, so saving even a few cycles might be worth it.

While making these changes, I found a few other things that might be
worth including.  16,17,18 are actual bug fixes.  The rest shouldn't
change the behaviour of any of the functions, provided no-one passed
negative nbits values.  If something should come up, it should be fairly
bisectable.

A few issues I thought about, but didn't know what to do with:

* Many of the functions misbehave if nbits is compile-time 0; the
  out-of-line functions generally handle 0 correctly.  bitmap_fill() is
  particularly bad, whether the 0 is known at compile time or not.  It
  would probably be nice to add detection of at least compile-time 0 and
  handle that appropriately.

* I didn't change __bitmap_shift_{left,right} to use unsigned because I
  want to fully understand why the algorithm works before making that
  change.  However, AFAICT, they behave correctly for all (positive) shift
  amounts.  This is not the case for the small_const_nbits versions.  If
  for example nbits = n = BITS_PER_LONG, the shift operators turn into
  no-ops (at least on x86), so one get *dst = *src, whereas one would
  expect to get *dst=0.  That difference in behaviour is somewhat
  annoying.

This patch (of 18):

The compiler can generate slightly smaller and simpler code when it
knows that "nbits" is non-negative.  Since no-one passes a negative
bit-count, this shouldn't affect the semantics.
Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

I've legally changed my name with New York State, the US Social Security
Administration, et al. This patch propagates the name change and change
in initials and login to comments in the kernel source as well.
Signed-off-by: NNadia Yvette Chambers <nyc@holomorphy.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

The code comments for bscnl_emit() and bitmap_scnlistprintf() are
describing snprintf() return semantics, but these functions use
scnprintf() return semantics.  Fix that, and document the
bitmap_scnprintf() return value as well.

Cc: Ryota Ozaki <ozaki.ryota@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

For files only using THIS_MODULE and/or EXPORT_SYMBOL, map
them onto including export.h -- or if the file isn't even
using those, then just delete the include.  Fix up any implicit
include dependencies that were being masked by module.h along
the way.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>