xfs: use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG for synchronous writeout

The VM and I/O schedulers now expect us to use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG for
synchronous writeout.  Right now I can't see any changes in performance
numbers with this, but we're getting some beating for not using it,
and the knowledge definitely could help the block code to make better
decisions.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c

@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ xfs_end_bio(
 
 STATIC void
 xfs_submit_ioend_bio(
+	struct writeback_control *wbc,
 	xfs_ioend_t		*ioend,
 	struct bio		*bio)
 {
@@ -426,7 +427,8 @@ xfs_submit_ioend_bio(
 	if (xfs_ioend_new_eof(ioend))
 		xfs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(XFS_I(ioend->io_inode));
 
-	submit_bio(WRITE, bio);
+	submit_bio(wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL ?
+		   WRITE_SYNC_PLUG : WRITE, bio);
 	ASSERT(!bio_flagged(bio, BIO_EOPNOTSUPP));
 	bio_put(bio);
 }
@@ -505,6 +507,7 @@ static inline int bio_add_buffer(struct bio *bio, struct buffer_head *bh)
  */
 STATIC void
 xfs_submit_ioend(
+	struct writeback_control *wbc,
 	xfs_ioend_t		*ioend)
 {
 	xfs_ioend_t		*head = ioend;
@@ -533,19 +536,19 @@ xfs_submit_ioend(
  retry:
 				bio = xfs_alloc_ioend_bio(bh);
 			} else if (bh->b_blocknr != lastblock + 1) {
-				xfs_submit_ioend_bio(ioend, bio);
+				xfs_submit_ioend_bio(wbc, ioend, bio);
 				goto retry;
 			}
 
 			if (bio_add_buffer(bio, bh) != bh->b_size) {
-				xfs_submit_ioend_bio(ioend, bio);
+				xfs_submit_ioend_bio(wbc, ioend, bio);
 				goto retry;
 			}
 
 			lastblock = bh->b_blocknr;
 		}
 		if (bio)
-			xfs_submit_ioend_bio(ioend, bio);
+			xfs_submit_ioend_bio(wbc, ioend, bio);
 		xfs_finish_ioend(ioend, 0);
 	} while ((ioend = next) != NULL);
 }
@@ -1198,7 +1201,7 @@ xfs_page_state_convert(
 	}
 
 	if (iohead)
-		xfs_submit_ioend(iohead);
+		xfs_submit_ioend(wbc, iohead);
 
 	return page_dirty;