-
由 Michael S. Tsirkin 提交于
sparse is unhappy about this code in hlist_add_tail_rcu: struct hlist_node *i, *last = NULL; for (i = hlist_first_rcu(h); i; i = hlist_next_rcu(i)) last = i; This is because hlist_next_rcu and hlist_next_rcu return __rcu pointers. It's a false positive - it's a write side primitive and so does not need to be called in a read side critical section. The following trivial patch disables the warning without changing the behaviour in any way. Note: __hlist_for_each_rcu would also remove the warning but it would be confusing since it calls rcu_derefence and is designed to run in the rcu read side critical section. Signed-off-by: NMichael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>48ac3466