- 05 11月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
There's no point in checking if the data lanes came out of reset after link training. If the data lanes aren't ready link training will fail anyway. Suggested-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Cc: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Acked-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Just grab the pps_mutex once and do all the pps panel startup operations while holding the mutex instead of grabbing the mutex separately for each individual step. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We'll be needing to the call the power seqeuencer functions while already holding pps_mutex, so split the locking out to small wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Since we read the current power seqeuncer delays from the registers (as well as looking at the vbt and spec values) we may end up corrupting delays we already initialized when we switch to another pipe and the power seqeuncer there has different values currently in the registers. So make sure we only initialize the delays once even if intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer() gets called multiple times. There was some discussion in the review about when exactly we need to unlock the pps. Quoting Bspec: "If this bit is not a zero, it activates the register write protect and writes to those registers will be ignored unless the write protect key value is set in the panel sequencing control register." Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> [danvet: Add Bspec quote per review discussion between Imre and Ville.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
The power seqeuncer delays are fixed for a given panel, so we can keep them around once computed. Not that on VLV/CHV we still re-compute them every time we initialize the power seqeuncer registers, but that will change soon enough. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
want_panel_vdd is a bool so it can't cope with interleaving on/off calls from multiple threads. If we want to make that possible we'd need to convert want_panel_vdd into a proper ref count. But an easier fix is to remove the high level vdd on/off calls from detect/hpd code paths and just rely on the delayed vdd off to avoid needless vdd on<->off ping pong. After this change only the encoder enable/disable paths use the high level functions, which is fine since both the on and off low level edp vdd calls from intel_dp_aux_ch() happen without dropping pps_mutex in between and so want_panel_vdd can't change in between. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Only ports B and C have the power sequencer and backlight controls, so complain if we ever try to register an eDP connector on some other port. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Everything else can be derived from that. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 03 10月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Clear the override bits to make sure the hardware manages the TX FIFO reset master on its own. v2: Squash with the earlier attempt at forcing the override bits Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
The register can house two different swing marging/deemph settings at once. However only one gets used based on some other bits. Make sure we set those bits correctly to make the hardware use the settings we provided. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 02 10月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
Even though it's unliky, we should check each aux transaction not just the first one. Also commit ce31d9f4 Author: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Date: Mon Sep 29 18:29:52 2014 -0400 drm/i915: preserve other DP_TEST_SINK bits. added a new aux transaction before the one which was checked. Fix this. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Inspired by Ville constifying the send buffer for pach_aux. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Use pack_aux() to construct the PSR exit DPMS D0 AUX message, and use the defines from dp_dp_helper.h to populate the message contents. v2: Use sizeof() for message size (Jani) Use a generic loop to write EDP_PSR_AUX_DATA registers Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 01 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
- fini goes with init, so call it intel_power_domains_fini. While at it shovel some of the fini code that leaked out of it back in. - give power_enabled functions the verb _is_ to make the meaning clearer. Also use a __ prefix instead of _unlocked to really discourage users. - rename runtime_pm_init/fini to enable/disable since that's what they do. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 30 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
Sink crc was implemented based on dp 1.1 spec that had all TEST_SINK bits reserved reading all 0s. But when reviewing my latest changes on sink crc Todd warned me that on new specs we have other valid bits on this reg that we might want to preserve. Cc: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
In some cases like when PSR just got enabled the panel need more vblank times to calculate CRC. I figured that out with the new PSR test cases facing some cases that I had a green screen but a blank CRC. Even with 2 vblank waits on kernel + 2 vblank waits on test case. So let's give up to 6 vblank wait time. However we now check for TEST_CRC_COUNT that shows when panel finished to calculate CRC and has it ready. v2: Jani pointed out attempts decrements was wrong and should never reach the error condition. And Daniel pointed out that EIO is more appropriated than EGAIN. Also I realized that I have to read test_crc_count after setting test_sink v3: Rebase and adding error message Cc: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 29 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
Let's make sure PSR is propperly disabled before to re-enabled it. According to Spec, after disabled PSR CTL, the Idle state might occur up to 24ms, that is one full frame time (1/refresh rate), plus SRD exit training time (max of 6ms), plus SRD aux channel handshake (max of 1.5ms). So if something went wrong PSR will be disabled until next full enable/disable setup. v2: The 24ms above takes in account 16ms for refresh rate on 60Hz mode. However on low frequency modes this can take longer. So let's use 50ms for safeness. v3: Move wait out of psr.lock critical area. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 25 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
The panel has to be reconfigured only when it really loose the power. The traditional enable/disable sequence already take care of this so we can minimize the time spend on every re-enable. Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 24 9月, 2014 6 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Skylake doesn't use the pre-charge field now, but, instead, we need to specify the total number of SYNC pulses for the SYNC phase (pre-charge + SYNC pattern pules). Let's use the default value (32) for that. v3: increase DP AUX TX timeout as 400us is not to be used on SKL apparently (Jesse). Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
We need to provide a vfunc that will make the code in intel_dp_aux_ch() loop once to start the AUX transaction. The return value (clock divider) is unused on SKL, so just return 1. Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
So we can apply the old aux_ctl = dp_ctl + 0x10 rule again. Reviewed-by: NThomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
They are similar to Haswell. v2: Rebased on top of drm-intel-nightly v3: Rebased on top of Sonika's DP train defines renaming Reviewed-by: NThomas Wood <thomas.wood@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
We don't need to setup everything else if it doesn't match all conditions. Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
psr_enabled is already by itself a setup once so let's put the W/As there and rename old setup once to setup_vsc. Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 19 9月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
If something while getting panel CRC this means that probably hw I/O error so hw is busted and try again shouldn't help much. Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
eDP panels are generally designed to support only a single clock and lane configuration. commit 56071a20 Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Date: Tue May 6 14:56:52 2014 +0300 drm/i915: use lane count and link rate from VBT as minimums for eDP should have started using the optimal link parameters for eDP panels. Turns out a certain other OS uses DPCD instead of VBT, which means trusting VBT on this may not be so reliable after all. Follow suit. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81647Tested-by: NAdam Jirasek <libm3l@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79386Tested-by: NNarthana Epa <narthana.epa+freedesktop@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
This goes back to commit 06ea66b6 Author: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Date: Mon Jan 20 10:19:39 2014 -0700 drm/i915: Enable 5.4Ghz (HBR2) link rate for Displayport 1.2-capable devices Cc: Todd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> [danvet: Pimp commit message a bit.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Oops, apparently intel_hdmi/intel_dp is the encoder - an object with a distinct lifetime to the connector, and so we cannot simply reuse the common function to unset and free the edid. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 18 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
The limited color range knob is in the port registers on g4x and vlv/chv for HDMI, and on g4x for DP. Add the relevant code to read out the hardware state into pipe config. On vlv/chv the DP port limited color range knob is in PIPECONF for which we already have readout code. Cc: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NChris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2014 8 次提交
-
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Jani wanted some comments to explain why we call certain vdd on/off functions in certain places. v2: Make the comments more thorough (Imre) Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
We need to turn the DP port off after the pipe, otherwise the pipe won't turn off properly on certain pch platforms at least (happens on my ILK for example). This also matches the BSpec modeset sequence better. We still don't match the spec exactly though (eg. audio disable should happen much earlier), but at last this eliminates the nasty wait_for_pipe_off() timeouts. We already did the port disable after the pipe for VLV/CHV and for CPU eDP. For g4x leave the port disable where it is since that matches the modeset sequence in the documentation and I don't have a suitable machine to test if the other order would work. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Bspec says we should enable the DP port before enabling panel power, and that the port must be enabled with training pattern 1. Do so. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
On VLV/CHV the panel power sequencer may need to be "kicked" a bit to lock onto the new port, and that needs to happen before any aux transfers are attempted if we want the aux transfers to actaully succeed. So turn on panel power (part of the "kick") before aux transfers (DPMS_ON + link training). This also matches the documented modeset sequence better for pch platforms. The documentation doesn't explicitly state anything about the DPMS or link training DPCD writes, but the panel power on step is always listed before link training is mentioned. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70117Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Try to make sure we find the power sequencer that the BIOS used by first looking for one which has the panel power enabled, then fall back to one with VDD force bit enabled, and finally look at just the port select bits. This should make us pick the correct power sequencer when the BIOS has already enabled the panel. Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> [danvet: Shorten the vlv_intial_pps_pipe to make lines fit into 80 chars.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
The power sequencer loses its state when the disp2d power well is down. Clear the dev_priv->pps_pipe tracking so that the power sequencer state gets reinitialized the next time it's needed. v2: Fix the pps_mutex vs. power_domain mutex deadlock by taking power domain reference first v3: Rename from edp_pps_(un)lock() to just pps_(un)lock() for the future, update due to backlight code changes Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
VLV/CHV have a per-pipe panel power sequencer which locks onto the port once used. We need to keep track wich power sequencers are locked to which ports. v2: remove spurious whitespace change, rebase due to backlight changes (Imre) Reviewed-by: NAntti Koskipaa <antti.koskipaa@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> [danvet: Break some really long lines to appease checkpatch a bit.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于
Introduce a new mutex (pps_mutex) to protect the power sequencer state. For now this state includes want_panel_vdd as well as the power sequencer registers. We need a single mutex (as opposed to per port) because later on we will need to deal with VLV/CHV which have multiple power sequencer which can be reassigned to different ports. v2: Add the locking to intel_dp_encoder_suspend too (Imre) v3: Take care intel_edp_backlight_power() and _intel_edp_backlight_on/off(), deal with reboot notifier vlv_power_sequencer_pipe() call (Imre) Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 03 9月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
As we may query the edid multiple times following a detect, record the EDID found during output discovery and reuse it. This is a separate issue from caching the output EDID across detection cycles. v2: Implement connector->force() callback so that edid is associated with the connector for user overrides as well (Ville) Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Both gmch and pch detection routines used the exact same routine for eDP, so de-duplicate. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: N: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Sonika Jindal 提交于
Rename the defines to have levels instead of values for vswing and pre-emph levels as the values may differ in other scenarios like low vswing of eDP1.4 where the values are different. Done using following cocci patch for each define: @@ @@ # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_400 (0 << 0) + # define DP_TRAIN_VOLTAGE_SWING_LEVEL_0 (0 << 0) ... Signed-off-by: NSonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-