1. 23 11月, 2013 3 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Make ACPI PCI root hotplug use common hotplug code · 3338db00
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable
      for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan
      handler to using the common hotplug code.
      
      This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more
      to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes
      arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug
      and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory.
      
      Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      3338db00
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Introduce common hotplug function acpi_device_hotplug() · c27b2c33
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify the common ACPI device hotplug code to always queue up the
      same function, acpi_device_hotplug(), using acpi_hotplug_execute()
      and make the PCI host bridge hotplug code use that function too for
      device hot removal.
      
      This allows some code duplication to be reduced and a race condition
      where the relevant ACPI handle may become invalid between the
      notification handler and the function queued up by it via
      acpi_hotplug_execute() to be avoided.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      c27b2c33
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace · 202317a5
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Modify the ACPI namespace scanning code to register a struct
      acpi_device object for every namespace node representing a device,
      processor and so on, even if the device represented by that namespace
      node is reported to be not present and not functional by _STA.
      
      There are multiple reasons to do that.  First of all, it avoids
      quite a lot of overhead when struct acpi_device objects are
      deleted every time acpi_bus_trim() is run and then added again
      by a subsequent acpi_bus_scan() for the same scope, although the
      namespace objects they correspond to stay in memory all the time
      (which always is the case on a vast majority of systems).
      
      Second, it will allow user space to see that there are namespace
      nodes representing devices that are not present at the moment and may
      be added to the system.  It will also allow user space to evaluate
      _SUN for those nodes to check what physical slots the "missing"
      devices may be put into and it will make sense to add a sysfs
      attribute for _STA evaluation after this change (that will be
      useful for thermal management on some systems).
      
      Next, it will help to consolidate the ACPI hotplug handling among
      subsystems by making it possible to store hotplug-related information
      in struct acpi_device objects in a standard common way.
      
      Finally, it will help to avoid a race condition related to the
      deletion of ACPI namespace nodes.  Namely, namespace nodes may be
      deleted as a result of a table unload triggered by _EJ0 or _DCK.
      If a hotplug notification for one of those nodes is triggered
      right before the deletion and it executes a hotplug callback
      via acpi_hotplug_execute(), the ACPI handle passed to that
      callback may be stale when the callback actually runs.  One way
      to work around that is to always pass struct acpi_device pointers
      to hotplug callbacks after doing a get_device() on the objects in
      question which eliminates the use-after-free possibility (the ACPI
      handles in those objects are invalidated by acpi_scan_drop_device(),
      so they will trigger ACPICA errors on attempts to use them).
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      202317a5
  2. 20 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      ACPI / hotplug: Fix conflicted PCI bridge notify handlers · ca499fc8
      Toshi Kani 提交于
      The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler,
      handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself.  Nevertheless, the ACPI
      hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler,
      acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges.  This causes
      acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported
      error as hotplug.enabled is not set.
      
      To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which
      indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by
      itself.  The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common
      notify handler when this flag is set.
      Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      [rjw: Changed the name of the new flag]
      Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ca499fc8
  3. 19 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Consolidate deferred execution of ACPI hotplug routines · 7b98118a
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the
      ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host
      bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common
      ACPI hotplug code and docking stations.  They both are somewhat
      cumbersome to use and work slightly differently.
      
      The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that
      will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work
      object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that
      object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work
      function with one more argument and let the interface take care of
      the execution details.
      
      The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the
      fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function
      pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of
      the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to
      pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been
      constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute().
      
      Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory
      allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are
      always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute()
      uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute().  Also,
      acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event
      workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas
      alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar.  That leads to
      somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI
      hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up.
      
      For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and
      acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface,
      acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more
      friendly to its users than any of the two.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
      7b98118a
  5. 07 11月, 2013 4 次提交
  6. 24 9月, 2013 10 次提交
  7. 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • N
      PCI/ACPI: Fix _OSC ordering to allow PCIe hotplug use when available · 3dc48af3
      Neil Horman 提交于
      This fixes the problem of acpiphp claiming slots that should be managed
      by pciehp, which may keep ExpressCard slots from working.
      
      The acpiphp driver claims PCIe slots unless the BIOS has granted us
      control of PCIe native hotplug via _OSC.  Prior to v3.10, the acpiphp
      .add method (add_bridge()) was always called *after* we had requested
      native hotplug control with _OSC.
      
      But after 3b63aaa7 ("PCI: acpiphp: Do not use ACPI PCI subdriver
      mechanism"), which appeared in v3.10, acpiphp initialization is done
      during the bus scan via the pcibios_add_bus() hook, and this happens
      *before* we request native hotplug control.
      
      Therefore, acpiphp doesn't know yet whether the BIOS will grant control,
      and it claims slots that we should be handling with native hotplug.
      
      This patch requests native hotplug control earlier, so we know whether
      the BIOS granted it to us before we initialize acpiphp.
      
      To avoid reintroducing the ASPM issue fixed by b8178f13 ('Revert
      "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus"'), we run
      _OSC earlier but defer the actual ASPM calls until after the bus scan is
      complete.
      
      Tested successfully by myself.
      
      [bhelgaas: changelog, mark for stable]
      Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60736Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v3.10+
      CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
      CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
      3dc48af3
  8. 26 7月, 2013 2 次提交
  9. 30 5月, 2013 4 次提交
  10. 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 16 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  12. 17 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 03 4月, 2013 1 次提交
    • B
      Revert "PCI/ACPI: Request _OSC control before scanning PCI root bus" · b8178f13
      Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
      This reverts commit 8c33f51d.
      
      Conflicts:
      	drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
      
      This commit broke some pre-1.1 PCIe devices by leaving them with
      ASPM enabled.  Previously, we had disabled ASPM on these devices
      because many of them don't implement it correctly (per 149e1637).
      
      Requesting _OSC control early means that aspm_disabled may be set
      before we scan the PCI bus and configure link ASPM state.  But the
      ASPM configuration currently skips the check for pre-PCIe 1.1 devices
      when aspm_disabled is set, like this:
      
          acpi_pci_root_add
            acpi_pci_osc_support
              if (flags != base_flags)
                pcie_no_aspm
                  aspm_disabled = 1
            pci_acpi_scan_root
              ...
                pcie_aspm_init_link_state
                  pcie_aspm_sanity_check
                    if (!aspm_disabled)
                      /* check for pre-PCIe 1.1 device */
      
      Therefore, setting aspm_disabled early means that we leave ASPM enabled
      on these pre-PCIe 1.1 devices, which is a regression for some devices.
      
      The best fix would be to clean up the ASPM init so we can evaluate
      _OSC before scanning the bug (that way boot-time and hot-add discovery
      will work the same), but that requires significant rework.
      
      For now, we'll just revert the _OSC change as the lowest-risk fix.
      
      Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55211Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org	# v3.8+
      b8178f13
  14. 30 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • Y
      PCI / ACPI: Don't query OSC support with all possible controls · 545d6e18
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      Found problem on system that firmware that could handle pci aer.
      Firmware get error reporting after pci injecting error, before os boots.
      But after os boots, firmware can not get report anymore, even pci=noaer
      is passed.
      
      Root cause: BIOS _OSC has problem with query bit checking.
      It turns out that BIOS vendor is copying example code from ACPI Spec.
      In ACPI Spec 5.0, page 290:
      
      	If (Not(And(CDW1,1))) // Query flag clear?
      	{	// Disable GPEs for features granted native control.
      		If (And(CTRL,0x01)) // Hot plug control granted?
      		{
      			Store(0,HPCE) // clear the hot plug SCI enable bit
      			Store(1,HPCS) // clear the hot plug SCI status bit
      		}
      	...
      	}
      
      When Query flag is set, And(CDW1,1) will be 1, Not(1) will return 0xfffffffe.
      So it will get into code path that should be for control set only.
      BIOS acpi code should be changed to "If (LEqual(And(CDW1,1), 0)))"
      
      Current kernel code is using _OSC query to notify firmware about support
      from OS and then use _OSC to set control bits.
      During query support, current code is using all possible controls.
      So will execute code that should be only for control set stage.
      
      That will have problem when pci=noaer or aer firmware_first is used.
      As firmware have that control set for os aer already in query support stage,
      but later will not os aer handling.
      
      We should avoid passing all possible controls, just use osc_control_set
      instead.
      That should workaround BIOS bugs with affected systems on the field
      as more bios vendors are copying sample code from ACPI spec.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      545d6e18
  15. 27 3月, 2013 1 次提交
  16. 17 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  17. 30 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  18. 26 1月, 2013 3 次提交
  19. 14 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance · 6c0cc950
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
      acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
      "firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
      the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
      (to put it lightly).
      
      This is how it works, roughly:
      
        1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
           creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
           object to acpi_pci_root_add().
      
        2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
           populates its "device" field with its argument's address
           (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).
      
        3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
           to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
           passed to pci_create_root_bus().
      
        4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
           and passes its "dev" member to device_register().
      
        5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
           acpi_platform_notify(), is called.
      
      So far, so good.  Now it starts to be "interesting".
      
        6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
           the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
           acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
           given device object.
      
        7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
           device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
           root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().
      
        8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
           root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
           and bus numbers.  Its handle is then used to initialize the
           ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
           acpi_bind_one().  However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
           started with in step 1.
      
      Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
      thanks to commit f3fd0c8a (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
      initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
      ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().
      
      Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
      defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
      interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
      that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
      passed to device_register().  Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
      implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
      acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
      aren't necessary any more.
      
      Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
      bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      6c0cc950
  20. 08 1月, 2013 1 次提交