1. 16 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  2. 13 10月, 2015 2 次提交
    • A
      bpf: charge user for creation of BPF maps and programs · aaac3ba9
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      since eBPF programs and maps use kernel memory consider it 'locked' memory
      from user accounting point of view and charge it against RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limit.
      This limit is typically set to 64Kbytes by distros, so almost all
      bpf+tracing programs would need to increase it, since they use maps,
      but kernel charges maximum map size upfront.
      For example the hash map of 1024 elements will be charged as 64Kbyte.
      It's inconvenient for current users and changes current behavior for root,
      but probably worth doing to be consistent root vs non-root.
      
      Similar accounting logic is done by mmap of perf_event.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      aaac3ba9
    • A
      bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs · 1be7f75d
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      In order to let unprivileged users load and execute eBPF programs
      teach verifier to prevent pointer leaks.
      Verifier will prevent
      - any arithmetic on pointers
        (except R10+Imm which is used to compute stack addresses)
      - comparison of pointers
        (except if (map_value_ptr == 0) ... )
      - passing pointers to helper functions
      - indirectly passing pointers in stack to helper functions
      - returning pointer from bpf program
      - storing pointers into ctx or maps
      
      Spill/fill of pointers into stack is allowed, but mangling
      of pointers stored in the stack or reading them byte by byte is not.
      
      Within bpf programs the pointers do exist, since programs need to
      be able to access maps, pass skb pointer to LD_ABS insns, etc
      but programs cannot pass such pointer values to the outside
      or obfuscate them.
      
      Only allow BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER unprivileged programs,
      so that socket filters (tcpdump), af_packet (quic acceleration)
      and future kcm can use it.
      tracing and tc cls/act program types still require root permissions,
      since tracing actually needs to be able to see all kernel pointers
      and tc is for root only.
      
      For example, the following unprivileged socket filter program is allowed:
      int bpf_prog1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
      {
        u32 index = load_byte(skb, ETH_HLEN + offsetof(struct iphdr, protocol));
        u64 *value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&my_map, &index);
      
        if (value)
      	*value += skb->len;
        return 0;
      }
      
      but the following program is not:
      int bpf_prog1(struct __sk_buff *skb)
      {
        u32 index = load_byte(skb, ETH_HLEN + offsetof(struct iphdr, protocol));
        u64 *value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&my_map, &index);
      
        if (value)
      	*value += (u64) skb;
        return 0;
      }
      since it would leak the kernel address into the map.
      
      Unprivileged socket filter bpf programs have access to the
      following helper functions:
      - map lookup/update/delete (but they cannot store kernel pointers into them)
      - get_random (it's already exposed to unprivileged user space)
      - get_smp_processor_id
      - tail_call into another socket filter program
      - ktime_get_ns
      
      The feature is controlled by sysctl kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled.
      This toggle defaults to off (0), but can be set true (1).  Once true,
      bpf programs and maps cannot be accessed from unprivileged process,
      and the toggle cannot be set back to false.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1be7f75d
  3. 08 10月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      bpf: split state from prandom_u32() and consolidate {c, e}BPF prngs · 3ad00405
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      While recently arguing on a seccomp discussion that raw prandom_u32()
      access shouldn't be exposed to unpriviledged user space, I forgot the
      fact that SKF_AD_RANDOM extension actually already does it for some time
      in cBPF via commit 4cd3675e ("filter: added BPF random opcode").
      
      Since prandom_u32() is being used in a lot of critical networking code,
      lets be more conservative and split their states. Furthermore, consolidate
      eBPF and cBPF prandom handlers to use the new internal PRNG. For eBPF,
      bpf_get_prandom_u32() was only accessible for priviledged users, but
      should that change one day, we also don't want to leak raw sequences
      through things like eBPF maps.
      
      One thought was also to have own per bpf_prog states, but due to ABI
      reasons this is not easily possible, i.e. the program code currently
      cannot access bpf_prog itself, and copying the rnd_state to/from the
      stack scratch space whenever a program uses the prng seems not really
      worth the trouble and seems too hacky. If needed, taus113 could in such
      cases be implemented within eBPF using a map entry to keep the state
      space, or get_random_bytes() could become a second helper in cases where
      performance would not be critical.
      
      Both sides can trigger a one-time late init via prandom_init_once() on
      the shared state. Performance-wise, there should even be a tiny gain
      as bpf_user_rnd_u32() saves one function call. The PRNG needs to live
      inside the BPF core since kernels could have a NET-less config as well.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Cc: Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3ad00405
  4. 03 10月, 2015 2 次提交
  5. 10 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 10 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  7. 31 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  8. 22 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs · 04fd61ab
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      introduce bpf_tail_call(ctx, &jmp_table, index) helper function
      which can be used from BPF programs like:
      int bpf_prog(struct pt_regs *ctx)
      {
        ...
        bpf_tail_call(ctx, &jmp_table, index);
        ...
      }
      that is roughly equivalent to:
      int bpf_prog(struct pt_regs *ctx)
      {
        ...
        if (jmp_table[index])
          return (*jmp_table[index])(ctx);
        ...
      }
      The important detail that it's not a normal call, but a tail call.
      The kernel stack is precious, so this helper reuses the current
      stack frame and jumps into another BPF program without adding
      extra call frame.
      It's trivially done in interpreter and a bit trickier in JITs.
      In case of x64 JIT the bigger part of generated assembler prologue
      is common for all programs, so it is simply skipped while jumping.
      Other JITs can do similar prologue-skipping optimization or
      do stack unwind before jumping into the next program.
      
      bpf_tail_call() arguments:
      ctx - context pointer
      jmp_table - one of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY maps used as the jump table
      index - index in the jump table
      
      Since all BPF programs are idenitified by file descriptor, user space
      need to populate the jmp_table with FDs of other BPF programs.
      If jmp_table[index] is empty the bpf_tail_call() doesn't jump anywhere
      and program execution continues as normal.
      
      New BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY map type is introduced so that user space can
      populate this jmp_table array with FDs of other bpf programs.
      Programs can share the same jmp_table array or use multiple jmp_tables.
      
      The chain of tail calls can form unpredictable dynamic loops therefore
      tail_call_cnt is used to limit the number of calls and currently is set to 32.
      
      Use cases:
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      
      ==========
      - simplify complex programs by splitting them into a sequence of small programs
      
      - dispatch routine
        For tracing and future seccomp the program may be triggered on all system
        calls, but processing of syscall arguments will be different. It's more
        efficient to implement them as:
        int syscall_entry(struct seccomp_data *ctx)
        {
           bpf_tail_call(ctx, &syscall_jmp_table, ctx->nr /* syscall number */);
           ... default: process unknown syscall ...
        }
        int sys_write_event(struct seccomp_data *ctx) {...}
        int sys_read_event(struct seccomp_data *ctx) {...}
        syscall_jmp_table[__NR_write] = sys_write_event;
        syscall_jmp_table[__NR_read] = sys_read_event;
      
        For networking the program may call into different parsers depending on
        packet format, like:
        int packet_parser(struct __sk_buff *skb)
        {
           ... parse L2, L3 here ...
           __u8 ipproto = load_byte(skb, ... offsetof(struct iphdr, protocol));
           bpf_tail_call(skb, &ipproto_jmp_table, ipproto);
           ... default: process unknown protocol ...
        }
        int parse_tcp(struct __sk_buff *skb) {...}
        int parse_udp(struct __sk_buff *skb) {...}
        ipproto_jmp_table[IPPROTO_TCP] = parse_tcp;
        ipproto_jmp_table[IPPROTO_UDP] = parse_udp;
      
      - for TC use case, bpf_tail_call() allows to implement reclassify-like logic
      
      - bpf_map_update_elem/delete calls into BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY jump table
        are atomic, so user space can build chains of BPF programs on the fly
      
      Implementation details:
      =======================
      - high performance of bpf_tail_call() is the goal.
        It could have been implemented without JIT changes as a wrapper on top of
        BPF_PROG_RUN() macro, but with two downsides:
        . all programs would have to pay performance penalty for this feature and
          tail call itself would be slower, since mandatory stack unwind, return,
          stack allocate would be done for every tailcall.
        . tailcall would be limited to programs running preempt_disabled, since
          generic 'void *ctx' doesn't have room for 'tail_call_cnt' and it would
          need to be either global per_cpu variable accessed by helper and by wrapper
          or global variable protected by locks.
      
        In this implementation x64 JIT bypasses stack unwind and jumps into the
        callee program after prologue.
      
      - bpf_prog_array_compatible() ensures that prog_type of callee and caller
        are the same and JITed/non-JITed flag is the same, since calling JITed
        program from non-JITed is invalid, since stack frames are different.
        Similarly calling kprobe type program from socket type program is invalid.
      
      - jump table is implemented as BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY to reuse 'map'
        abstraction, its user space API and all of verifier logic.
        It's in the existing arraymap.c file, since several functions are
        shared with regular array map.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      04fd61ab
  9. 02 4月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      tracing, perf: Implement BPF programs attached to kprobes · 2541517c
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      BPF programs, attached to kprobes, provide a safe way to execute
      user-defined BPF byte-code programs without being able to crash or
      hang the kernel in any way. The BPF engine makes sure that such
      programs have a finite execution time and that they cannot break
      out of their sandbox.
      
      The user interface is to attach to a kprobe via the perf syscall:
      
      	struct perf_event_attr attr = {
      		.type	= PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
      		.config	= event_id,
      		...
      	};
      
      	event_fd = perf_event_open(&attr,...);
      	ioctl(event_fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF, prog_fd);
      
      'prog_fd' is a file descriptor associated with BPF program
      previously loaded.
      
      'event_id' is an ID of the kprobe created.
      
      Closing 'event_fd':
      
      	close(event_fd);
      
      ... automatically detaches BPF program from it.
      
      BPF programs can call in-kernel helper functions to:
      
        - lookup/update/delete elements in maps
      
        - probe_read - wraper of probe_kernel_read() used to access any
          kernel data structures
      
      BPF programs receive 'struct pt_regs *' as an input ('struct pt_regs' is
      architecture dependent) and return 0 to ignore the event and 1 to store
      kprobe event into the ring buffer.
      
      Note, kprobes are a fundamentally _not_ a stable kernel ABI,
      so BPF programs attached to kprobes must be recompiled for
      every kernel version and user must supply correct LINUX_VERSION_CODE
      in attr.kern_version during bpf_prog_load() call.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>
      Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
      Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1427312966-8434-4-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      2541517c
  10. 16 3月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: allow extended BPF programs access skb fields · 9bac3d6d
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      introduce user accessible mirror of in-kernel 'struct sk_buff':
      struct __sk_buff {
          __u32 len;
          __u32 pkt_type;
          __u32 mark;
          __u32 queue_mapping;
      };
      
      bpf programs can do:
      
      int bpf_prog(struct __sk_buff *skb)
      {
          __u32 var = skb->pkt_type;
      
      which will be compiled to bpf assembler as:
      
      dst_reg = *(u32 *)(src_reg + 4) // 4 == offsetof(struct __sk_buff, pkt_type)
      
      bpf verifier will check validity of access and will convert it to:
      
      dst_reg = *(u8 *)(src_reg + offsetof(struct sk_buff, __pkt_type_offset))
      dst_reg &= 7
      
      since skb->pkt_type is a bitfield.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9bac3d6d
  11. 02 3月, 2015 2 次提交
    • D
      cls_bpf: add initial eBPF support for programmable classifiers · e2e9b654
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      This work extends the "classic" BPF programmable tc classifier by
      extending its scope also to native eBPF code!
      
      This allows for user space to implement own custom, 'safe' C like
      classifiers (or whatever other frontend language LLVM et al may
      provide in future), that can then be compiled with the LLVM eBPF
      backend to an eBPF elf file. The result of this can be loaded into
      the kernel via iproute2's tc. In the kernel, they can be JITed on
      major archs and thus run in native performance.
      
      Simple, minimal toy example to demonstrate the workflow:
      
        #include <linux/ip.h>
        #include <linux/if_ether.h>
        #include <linux/bpf.h>
      
        #include "tc_bpf_api.h"
      
        __section("classify")
        int cls_main(struct sk_buff *skb)
        {
          return (0x800 << 16) | load_byte(skb, ETH_HLEN + __builtin_offsetof(struct iphdr, tos));
        }
      
        char __license[] __section("license") = "GPL";
      
      The classifier can then be compiled into eBPF opcodes and loaded
      via tc, for example:
      
        clang -O2 -emit-llvm -c cls.c -o - | llc -march=bpf -filetype=obj -o cls.o
        tc filter add dev em1 parent 1: bpf cls.o [...]
      
      As it has been demonstrated, the scope can even reach up to a fully
      fledged flow dissector (similarly as in samples/bpf/sockex2_kern.c).
      
      For tc, maps are allowed to be used, but from kernel context only,
      in other words, eBPF code can keep state across filter invocations.
      In future, we perhaps may reattach from a different application to
      those maps e.g., to read out collected statistics/state.
      
      Similarly as in socket filters, we may extend functionality for eBPF
      classifiers over time depending on the use cases. For that purpose,
      cls_bpf programs are using BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS program type, so
      we can allow additional functions/accessors (e.g. an ABI compatible
      offset translation to skb fields/metadata). For an initial cls_bpf
      support, we allow the same set of helper functions as eBPF socket
      filters, but we could diverge at some point in time w/o problem.
      
      I was wondering whether cls_bpf and act_bpf could share C programs,
      I can imagine that at some point, we introduce i) further common
      handlers for both (or even beyond their scope), and/or if truly needed
      ii) some restricted function space for each of them. Both can be
      abstracted easily through struct bpf_verifier_ops in future.
      
      The context of cls_bpf versus act_bpf is slightly different though:
      a cls_bpf program will return a specific classid whereas act_bpf a
      drop/non-drop return code, latter may also in future mangle skbs.
      That said, we can surely have a "classify" and "action" section in
      a single object file, or considered mentioned constraint add a
      possibility of a shared section.
      
      The workflow for getting native eBPF running from tc [1] is as
      follows: for f_bpf, I've added a slightly modified ELF parser code
      from Alexei's kernel sample, which reads out the LLVM compiled
      object, sets up maps (and dynamically fixes up map fds) if any, and
      loads the eBPF instructions all centrally through the bpf syscall.
      
      The resulting fd from the loaded program itself is being passed down
      to cls_bpf, which looks up struct bpf_prog from the fd store, and
      holds reference, so that it stays available also after tc program
      lifetime. On tc filter destruction, it will then drop its reference.
      
      Moreover, I've also added the optional possibility to annotate an
      eBPF filter with a name (e.g. path to object file, or something
      else if preferred) so that when tc dumps currently installed filters,
      some more context can be given to an admin for a given instance (as
      opposed to just the file descriptor number).
      
      Last but not least, bpf_prog_get() and bpf_prog_put() needed to be
      exported, so that eBPF can be used from cls_bpf built as a module.
      Thanks to 60a3b225 ("net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images
      read-only") I think this is of no concern since anything wanting to
      alter eBPF opcode after verification stage would crash the kernel.
      
        [1] http://git.breakpoint.cc/cgit/dborkman/iproute2.git/log/?h=ebpfSigned-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
      Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e2e9b654
    • D
      ebpf: move read-only fields to bpf_prog and shrink bpf_prog_aux · 24701ece
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      is_gpl_compatible and prog_type should be moved directly into bpf_prog
      as they stay immutable during bpf_prog's lifetime, are core attributes
      and they can be locked as read-only later on via bpf_prog_select_runtime().
      
      With a bit of rearranging, this also allows us to shrink bpf_prog_aux
      to exactly 1 cacheline.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      24701ece
  12. 27 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 19 11月, 2014 2 次提交
    • A
      bpf: fix BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM command return code · a1854d6a
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      fix errno of BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM command as bpf manpage
      described it in commit b4fc1a46("Merge branch 'bpf-next'"):
      -----
      BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM
          int bpf_lookup_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value)
          {
              union bpf_attr attr = {
                  .map_fd = fd,
                  .key = ptr_to_u64(key),
                  .value = ptr_to_u64(value),
              };
      
              return bpf(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM, &attr, sizeof(attr));
          }
          bpf() syscall looks up an element with given key in  a  map  fd.
          If  element  is found it returns zero and stores element's value
          into value.  If element is not found  it  returns  -1  and  sets
          errno to ENOENT.
      
      and further down in manpage:
      
         ENOENT For BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM or BPF_MAP_DELETE_ELEM,  indicates  that
                element with given key was not found.
      -----
      
      In general all BPF commands return ENOENT when map element is not found
      (including BPF_MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY and BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM with
       flags == BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ONLY)
      
      Subsequent patch adds a testsuite to check return values for all of
      these combinations.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a1854d6a
    • A
      bpf: add 'flags' attribute to BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command · 3274f520
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      the current meaning of BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM syscall command is:
      either update existing map element or create a new one.
      Initially the plan was to add a new command to handle the case of
      'create new element if it didn't exist', but 'flags' style looks
      cleaner and overall diff is much smaller (more code reused), so add 'flags'
      attribute to BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command with the following meaning:
       #define BPF_ANY	0 /* create new element or update existing */
       #define BPF_NOEXIST	1 /* create new element if it didn't exist */
       #define BPF_EXIST	2 /* update existing element */
      
      bpf_update_elem(fd, key, value, BPF_NOEXIST) call can fail with EEXIST
      if element already exists.
      
      bpf_update_elem(fd, key, value, BPF_EXIST) can fail with ENOENT
      if element doesn't exist.
      
      Userspace will call it as:
      int bpf_update_elem(int fd, void *key, void *value, __u64 flags)
      {
          union bpf_attr attr = {
              .map_fd = fd,
              .key = ptr_to_u64(key),
              .value = ptr_to_u64(value),
              .flags = flags;
          };
      
          return bpf(BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM, &attr, sizeof(attr));
      }
      
      First two bits of 'flags' are used to encode style of bpf_update_elem() command.
      Bits 2-63 are reserved for future use.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3274f520
  14. 27 9月, 2014 6 次提交
    • A
      bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log) · cbd35700
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      add optional attributes for BPF_PROG_LOAD syscall:
      union bpf_attr {
          struct {
      	...
      	__u32         log_level; /* verbosity level of eBPF verifier */
      	__u32         log_size;  /* size of user buffer */
      	__aligned_u64 log_buf;   /* user supplied 'char *buffer' */
          };
      };
      
      when log_level > 0 the verifier will return its verification log in the user
      supplied buffer 'log_buf' which can be used by program author to analyze why
      verifier rejected given program.
      
      'Understanding eBPF verifier messages' section of Documentation/networking/filter.txt
      provides several examples of these messages, like the program:
      
        BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
        BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
        BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
        BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
        BPF_CALL_FUNC(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
        BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
        BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 4, 0),
        BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
      
      will be rejected with the following multi-line message in log_buf:
      
        0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 0
        1: (bf) r2 = r10
        2: (07) r2 += -8
        3: (b7) r1 = 0
        4: (85) call 1
        5: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+1
         R0=map_ptr R10=fp
        6: (7a) *(u64 *)(r0 +4) = 0
        misaligned access off 4 size 8
      
      The format of the output can change at any time as verifier evolves.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cbd35700
    • A
      bpf: verifier (add docs) · 51580e79
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      this patch adds all of eBPF verfier documentation and empty bpf_check()
      
      The end goal for the verifier is to statically check safety of the program.
      
      Verifier will catch:
      - loops
      - out of range jumps
      - unreachable instructions
      - invalid instructions
      - uninitialized register access
      - uninitialized stack access
      - misaligned stack access
      - out of range stack access
      - invalid calling convention
      
      More details in Documentation/networking/filter.txt
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      51580e79
    • A
      bpf: handle pseudo BPF_CALL insn · 0a542a86
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      in native eBPF programs userspace is using pseudo BPF_CALL instructions
      which encode one of 'enum bpf_func_id' inside insn->imm field.
      Verifier checks that program using correct function arguments to given func_id.
      If all checks passed, kernel needs to fixup BPF_CALL->imm fields by
      replacing func_id with in-kernel function pointer.
      eBPF interpreter just calls the function.
      
      In-kernel eBPF users continue to use generic BPF_CALL.
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0a542a86
    • A
      bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload · 09756af4
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      eBPF programs are similar to kernel modules. They are loaded by the user
      process and automatically unloaded when process exits. Each eBPF program is
      a safe run-to-completion set of instructions. eBPF verifier statically
      determines that the program terminates and is safe to execute.
      
      The following syscall wrapper can be used to load the program:
      int bpf_prog_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
                        const struct bpf_insn *insns, int insn_cnt,
                        const char *license)
      {
          union bpf_attr attr = {
              .prog_type = prog_type,
              .insns = ptr_to_u64(insns),
              .insn_cnt = insn_cnt,
              .license = ptr_to_u64(license),
          };
      
          return bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD, &attr, sizeof(attr));
      }
      where 'insns' is an array of eBPF instructions and 'license' is a string
      that must be GPL compatible to call helper functions marked gpl_only
      
      Upon succesful load the syscall returns prog_fd.
      Use close(prog_fd) to unload the program.
      
      User space tests and examples follow in the later patches
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      09756af4
    • A
      bpf: add lookup/update/delete/iterate methods to BPF maps · db20fd2b
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      'maps' is a generic storage of different types for sharing data between kernel
      and userspace.
      
      The maps are accessed from user space via BPF syscall, which has commands:
      
      - create a map with given type and attributes
        fd = bpf(BPF_MAP_CREATE, union bpf_attr *attr, u32 size)
        returns fd or negative error
      
      - lookup key in a given map referenced by fd
        err = bpf(BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM, union bpf_attr *attr, u32 size)
        using attr->map_fd, attr->key, attr->value
        returns zero and stores found elem into value or negative error
      
      - create or update key/value pair in a given map
        err = bpf(BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM, union bpf_attr *attr, u32 size)
        using attr->map_fd, attr->key, attr->value
        returns zero or negative error
      
      - find and delete element by key in a given map
        err = bpf(BPF_MAP_DELETE_ELEM, union bpf_attr *attr, u32 size)
        using attr->map_fd, attr->key
      
      - iterate map elements (based on input key return next_key)
        err = bpf(BPF_MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY, union bpf_attr *attr, u32 size)
        using attr->map_fd, attr->key, attr->next_key
      
      - close(fd) deletes the map
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      db20fd2b
    • A
      bpf: introduce BPF syscall and maps · 99c55f7d
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      BPF syscall is a multiplexor for a range of different operations on eBPF.
      This patch introduces syscall with single command to create a map.
      Next patch adds commands to access maps.
      
      'maps' is a generic storage of different types for sharing data between kernel
      and userspace.
      
      Userspace example:
      /* this syscall wrapper creates a map with given type and attributes
       * and returns map_fd on success.
       * use close(map_fd) to delete the map
       */
      int bpf_create_map(enum bpf_map_type map_type, int key_size,
                         int value_size, int max_entries)
      {
          union bpf_attr attr = {
              .map_type = map_type,
              .key_size = key_size,
              .value_size = value_size,
              .max_entries = max_entries
          };
      
          return bpf(BPF_MAP_CREATE, &attr, sizeof(attr));
      }
      
      'union bpf_attr' is backwards compatible with future extensions.
      
      More details in Documentation/networking/filter.txt and in manpage
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      99c55f7d