From fff6ca9cc46857e5814cf687e5fb1b8a876766a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 18:17:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] nfsd4: eliminate impossible open replay case

If open fails with any error other than nfserr_replay_me, then the main
nfsd4_proc_compound() loop continues unconditionally to
nfsd4_encode_operation(), which will always call encode_seqid_op_tail.
Thus the condition we check for here does not occur.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 6cf729a096c3..26b0c75aa93b 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -2495,18 +2495,8 @@ nfsd4_process_open1(struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
 		open->op_stateowner = NULL;
 		goto renew;
 	}
-	if (open->op_seqid == sop->so_seqid - 1) {
-		if (sop->so_replay.rp_buflen)
-			return nfserr_replay_me;
-		/* The original OPEN failed so spectacularly
-		 * that we don't even have replay data saved!
-		 * Therefore, we have no choice but to continue
-		 * processing this OPEN; presumably, we'll
-		 * fail again for the same reason.
-		 */
-		dprintk("nfsd4_process_open1: replay with no replay cache\n");
-		goto renew;
-	}
+	if (open->op_seqid == sop->so_seqid - 1)
+		return nfserr_replay_me;
 	if (open->op_seqid != sop->so_seqid)
 		return nfserr_bad_seqid;
 renew:
-- 
GitLab