acpi: fix of pmtimer overflow that make Cx states time incorrect
We found Cx states time abnormal in our some of machines which have 16 LCPUs, the C0 take too many time while system is really idle when kernel enabled tickless and highres. powertop output is below: PowerTOP version 1.9 (C) 2007 Intel Corporation Cn Avg residency P-states (frequencies) C0 (cpu running) (40.5%) 2.53 Ghz 0.0% C1 0.0ms ( 0.0%) 2.53 Ghz 0.0% C2 128.8ms (59.5%) 2.40 Ghz 0.0% 1.60 Ghz 100.0% Wakeups-from-idle per second : 4.7 interval: 20.0s no ACPI power usage estimate available Top causes for wakeups: 41.4% ( 24.9) <interrupt> : extra timer interrupt 20.2% ( 12.2) <kernel core> : usb_hcd_poll_rh_status (rh_timer_func) After tacking detailed for this issue, Yakui and I find it is due to 24 bit PM timer overflows when some of cpu sleep more than 4 seconds. With tickless kernel, the CPU want to sleep as much as possible when system idle. But the Cx sleep time are recorded by pmtimer which length is determined by BIOS. The current Cx time was gotten in the following function from driver/acpi/processor_idle.c: static inline u32 ticks_elapsed(u32 t1, u32 t2) { if (t2 >= t1) return (t2 - t1); else if (!(acpi_gbl_FADT.flags & ACPI_FADT_32BIT_TIMER)) return (((0x00FFFFFF - t1) + t2) & 0x00FFFFFF); else return ((0xFFFFFFFF - t1) + t2); } If pmtimer is 24 bits and it take 5 seconds from t1 to t2, in above function, just about 1 seconds ticks was recorded. So the Cx time will be reduced about 4 seconds. and this is why we see above powertop output. To resolve this problem, Yakui and I use ktime_get() to record the Cx states time instead of PM timer as the following patch. the patch was tested with i386/x86_64 modes on several platforms. Acked-by: NVenkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com> Tested-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NYakui.zhao <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录