From b0deca2e0270135f797e81bdb0743e50fd1dc58d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dimitri Sivanich Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 08:16:41 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] x86/UV: Lower UV rtc clocksource rating Lower the rating of the UV rtc clocksource to just below that of the tsc, to improve performance. Reading the tsc clocksource has lower latency than reading the rtc, so favor it in situations where it is synchronized and stable. When the tsc is unsynchronized, the rtc needs to be the chosen clocksource. Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich Cc: John Stultz Cc: Jack Steiner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120217141641.GA28063@sgi.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c index 9f29a01ee1b3..5032e0d19b86 100644 --- a/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c +++ b/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_time.c @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static void uv_rtc_timer_setup(enum clock_event_mode, static struct clocksource clocksource_uv = { .name = RTC_NAME, - .rating = 400, + .rating = 299, .read = uv_read_rtc, .mask = (cycle_t)UVH_RTC_REAL_TIME_CLOCK_MASK, .flags = CLOCK_SOURCE_IS_CONTINUOUS, @@ -379,10 +379,6 @@ static __init int uv_rtc_setup_clock(void) if (!is_uv_system()) return -ENODEV; - /* If single blade, prefer tsc */ - if (uv_num_possible_blades() == 1) - clocksource_uv.rating = 250; - rc = clocksource_register_hz(&clocksource_uv, sn_rtc_cycles_per_second); if (rc) printk(KERN_INFO "UV RTC clocksource failed rc %d\n", rc); -- GitLab