From 7e56fbd27b4bd6ab7d641f45bf23d2af654412f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 01:39:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] bpf, x86_64/arm64: remove old ldimm64 artifacts from jits For both cases, the verifier is already rejecting such invalid formed instructions. Thus, remove these artifacts from old times and align it with ppc64, sparc64 and s390x JITs that don't have them in the first place. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 9 --------- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 7 ------- 2 files changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index a785554916c0..304736870dca 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -604,15 +604,6 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx) const struct bpf_insn insn1 = insn[1]; u64 imm64; - if (insn1.code != 0 || insn1.src_reg != 0 || - insn1.dst_reg != 0 || insn1.off != 0) { - /* Note: verifier in BPF core must catch invalid - * instructions. - */ - pr_err_once("Invalid BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - imm64 = (u64)insn1.imm << 32 | (u32)imm; emit_a64_mov_i64(dst, imm64, ctx); diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 32322ce9b405..14f840df1d95 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -490,13 +490,6 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, break; case BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW: - if (insn[1].code != 0 || insn[1].src_reg != 0 || - insn[1].dst_reg != 0 || insn[1].off != 0) { - /* verifier must catch invalid insns */ - pr_err("invalid BPF_LD_IMM64 insn\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - /* optimization: if imm64 is zero, use 'xor ,' * to save 7 bytes. */ -- GitLab