提交 66f01296 编写于 作者: O Octavian Purdila 提交者: Johan Hedberg

Bluetooth: Fix RFCOMM session reference counting issue

There is an imbalance in the rfcomm_session_hold / rfcomm_session_put
operations which causes the following crash:

[  685.010159] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 6b6b6b6b
[  685.010169] IP: [<c149d76d>] rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e
[  685.010181] *pdpt = 000000002d665001 *pde = 0000000000000000
[  685.010191] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  685.010247]
[  685.010255] Pid: 947, comm: krfcommd Tainted: G         C  3.0.16-mid8-dirty #44
[  685.010266] EIP: 0060:[<c149d76d>] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 1
[  685.010274] EIP is at rfcomm_process_dlcs+0x1b/0x15e
[  685.010281] EAX: e79f551c EBX: 6b6b6b6b ECX: 00000007 EDX: e79f40b4
[  685.010288] ESI: e79f4060 EDI: ed4e1f70 EBP: ed4e1f68 ESP: ed4e1f50
[  685.010295]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
[  685.010303] Process krfcommd (pid: 947, ti=ed4e0000 task=ed43e5e0 task.ti=ed4e0000)
[  685.010308] Stack:
[  685.010312]  ed4e1f68 c149eb53 e5925150 e79f4060 ed500000 ed4e1f70 ed4e1f80 c149ec10
[  685.010331]  00000000 ed43e5e0 00000000 ed4e1f90 ed4e1f9c c149ec87 0000bf54 00000000
[  685.010348]  00000000 ee03bf54 c149ec37 ed4e1fe4 c104fe01 00000000 00000000 00000000
[  685.010367] Call Trace:
[  685.010376]  [<c149eb53>] ? rfcomm_process_rx+0x6e/0x74
[  685.010387]  [<c149ec10>] rfcomm_process_sessions+0xb7/0xde
[  685.010398]  [<c149ec87>] rfcomm_run+0x50/0x6d
[  685.010409]  [<c149ec37>] ? rfcomm_process_sessions+0xde/0xde
[  685.010419]  [<c104fe01>] kthread+0x63/0x68
[  685.010431]  [<c104fd9e>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42
[  685.010442]  [<c14dae82>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd

This issue has been brought up earlier here:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/5/21/127

The issue appears to be the rfcomm_session_put in rfcomm_recv_ua. This
operation doesn't seem be to required as for the non-initiator case we
have the rfcomm_process_rx doing an explicit put and in the initiator
case the last dlc_unlink will drive the reference counter to 0.

There have been several attempts to fix these issue:

6c2718da Bluetooth: Do not call rfcomm_session_put() for RFCOMM UA on closed socket
683d949a Bluetooth: Never deallocate a session when some DLC points to it

but AFAICS they do not fix the issue just make it harder to reproduce.
Signed-off-by: NOctavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGopala Krishna Murala <gopala.krishna.murala@intel.com>
Acked-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@intel.com>
上级 4777bfde
......@@ -1164,12 +1164,18 @@ static int rfcomm_recv_ua(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 dlci)
break;
case BT_DISCONN:
/* When socket is closed and we are not RFCOMM
* initiator rfcomm_process_rx already calls
* rfcomm_session_put() */
if (s->sock->sk->sk_state != BT_CLOSED)
if (list_empty(&s->dlcs))
rfcomm_session_put(s);
/* rfcomm_session_put is called later so don't do
* anything here otherwise we will mess up the session
* reference counter:
*
* (a) when we are the initiator dlc_unlink will drive
* the reference counter to 0 (there is no initial put
* after session_add)
*
* (b) when we are not the initiator rfcomm_rx_process
* will explicitly call put to balance the initial hold
* done after session add.
*/
break;
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册