Skip to content

R
raspberrypi-kernel

openeuler / raspberrypi-kernel

通知 14
Star 1
Fork 0
R
raspberrypi-kernel
提交 5ae25d8d 编写于 作者: S Seunghun Han 提交者： Xie XiuQi
浏览文件
操作

acpi: acpica: fix acpi parse and parseext cache leaks 

hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 13690
CVE: CVE-2017-13694

-------------------------------------------------

I'm Seunghun Han, and I work for National Security Research Institute of
South Korea.

I have been doing a research on ACPI and found an ACPI cache leak in ACPI
early abort cases.

Boot log of ACPI cache leak is as follows:
[    0.352414] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
[    0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
[    0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
[    0.353182] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
[    0.356028] ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter
[    0.356799] ACPI Error: Could not remove SCI handler (20170303/evmisc-281)
[    0.360215] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-State: Slab cache still has objects
[    0.360648] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W
4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #10
[    0.361273] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[    0.361873] Call Trace:
[    0.362243]  ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
[    0.362591]  ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
[    0.362944]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[    0.363296]  ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
[    0.363646]  ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x6d/0x7b
[    0.364000]  ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
[    0.364000]  ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
[    0.364000]  ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80
[    0.364000]  ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f
[    0.364000]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[    0.364000]  ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
[    0.364000]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a
[    0.364000]  ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0
[    0.364000]  ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
[    0.364000]  ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

I analyzed this memory leak in detail. I found that “Acpi-State” cache and
“Acpi-Parse” cache were merged because the size of cache objects was same
slab cache size.

I finally found “Acpi-Parse” cache and “Acpi-ParseExt” cache were leaked
using SLAB_NEVER_MERGE flag in kmem_cache_create() function.

Real ACPI cache leak point is as follows:
[    0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(Module Device)
[    0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Device)
[    0.360101] ACPI: Added _OSI(3.0 _SCP Extensions)
[    0.361043] ACPI: Added _OSI(Processor Aggregator Device)
[    0.364016] ACPI: Unable to start the ACPI Interpreter
[    0.365061] ACPI Error: Could not remove SCI handler (20170303/evmisc-281)
[    0.368174] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-Parse: Slab cache still has objects
[    0.369332] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W
4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #8
[    0.371256] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[    0.372000] Call Trace:
[    0.372000]  ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
[    0.372000]  ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
[    0.372000]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[    0.372000]  ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
[    0.372000]  ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x56/0x7b
[    0.372000]  ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
[    0.372000]  ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
[    0.372000]  ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80
[    0.372000]  ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f
[    0.372000]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[    0.372000]  ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
[    0.372000]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a
[    0.372000]  ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0
[    0.372000]  ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
[    0.372000]  ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
[    0.388039] kmem_cache_destroy Acpi-ParseExt: Slab cache still has objects
[    0.389063] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G        W
4.12.0-rc4-next-20170608+ #8
[    0.390557] Hardware name: innotek GmbH VirtualBox/VirtualBox, BIOS
VirtualBox 12/01/2006
[    0.392000] Call Trace:
[    0.392000]  ? dump_stack+0x5c/0x81
[    0.392000]  ? kmem_cache_destroy+0x1aa/0x1c0
[    0.392000]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[    0.392000]  ? acpi_os_delete_cache+0xa/0x10
[    0.392000]  ? acpi_ut_delete_caches+0x6d/0x7b
[    0.392000]  ? acpi_terminate+0xa/0x14
[    0.392000]  ? acpi_init+0x2af/0x34f
[    0.392000]  ? __class_create+0x4c/0x80
[    0.392000]  ? video_setup+0x7f/0x7f
[    0.392000]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x27/0x27
[    0.392000]  ? do_one_initcall+0x4e/0x1a0
[    0.392000]  ? kernel_init_freeable+0x189/0x20a
[    0.392000]  ? rest_init+0xc0/0xc0
[    0.392000]  ? kernel_init+0xa/0x100
[    0.392000]  ? ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30

When early abort is occurred due to invalid ACPI information, Linux kernel
terminates ACPI by calling acpi_terminate() function. The function calls
acpi_ut_delete_caches() function to delete local caches (acpi_gbl_namespace_
cache, state_cache, operand_cache, ps_node_cache, ps_node_ext_cache).

But the deletion codes in acpi_ut_delete_caches() function only delete
slab caches using kmem_cache_destroy() function, therefore the cache
objects should be flushed before acpi_ut_delete_caches() function.

“Acpi-Parse” cache and “Acpi-ParseExt” cache are used in an AML parse
function, acpi_ps_parse_loop(). The function should have flush codes to
handle an error state due to invalid AML codes.

This cache leak has a security threat because an old kernel (<= 4.9) shows
memory locations of kernel functions in stack dump. Some malicious users
could use this information to neutralize kernel ASLR.

To fix ACPI cache leak for enhancing security, I made a patch which has
flush codes in acpi_ps_parse_loop() function.

I hope that this patch improves the security of Linux kernel.

Thank you.
Signed-off-by: NSeunghun Han <kkamagui@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
上级 79e22ebd
显示空白变更内容
内联 并排
Showing with 16 addition and 37 deletion
drivers/acpi/acpica/psobject.c
浏览文件 @ 5ae25d8d
......@@ -640,7 +640,8 @@ acpi_status
acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
union acpi_parse_object *op, acpi_status status)
{
acpi_status status2;
acpi_status return_status = AE_OK;
u8 ascending = TRUE;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE_PTR(ps_complete_final_op, walk_state);
......@@ -654,7 +655,8 @@ acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
op));
do {
if (op) {
if (walk_state->ascending_callback != NULL) {
if (ascending &&
walk_state->ascending_callback != NULL) {
walk_state->op = op;
walk_state->op_info =
acpi_ps_get_opcode_info(op->common.
......@@ -676,49 +678,26 @@ acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
}
if (status == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE) {
status = AE_OK;
/* Clean up */
do {
if (op) {
status2 =
acpi_ps_complete_this_op
(walk_state, op);
if (ACPI_FAILURE
(status2)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS
(status2);
}
}
acpi_ps_pop_scope(&
(walk_state->
parser_state),
&op,
&walk_state->
arg_types,
&walk_state->
arg_count);
} while (op);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
ascending = FALSE;
return_status = AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
}
else if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
/* First error is most important */
(void)
acpi_ps_complete_this_op(walk_state,
op);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
ascending = FALSE;
return_status = status;
}
}
status2 = acpi_ps_complete_this_op(walk_state, op);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status2)) {
return_ACPI_STATUS(status2);
status = acpi_ps_complete_this_op(walk_state, op);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
ascending = FALSE;
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(return_status) ||
return_status == AE_CTRL_TERMINATE) {
return_status = status;
}
}
}
......@@ -728,5 +707,5 @@ acpi_ps_complete_final_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
} while (op);
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
return_ACPI_STATUS(return_status);
}
Markdown is supported
0% 或 .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑！
想要评论请 注册 或