提交 49a4bda2 编写于 作者: J Jeff Layton 提交者: Trond Myklebust

nfs4: queue free_lock_state job submission to nfsiod

We got a report of the following warning in Fedora:

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/slub.c:969
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 533, name: bash
3 locks held by bash/533:
 #0:  (&sp->so_delegreturn_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa033da62>] nfs4_proc_lock+0x262/0x910 [nfsv4]
 #1:  (&nfsi->rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffffa033da6a>] nfs4_proc_lock+0x26a/0x910 [nfsv4]
 #2:  (&sb->s_type->i_lock_key#23){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff812998dc>] flock_lock_file_wait+0x8c/0x3a0
CPU: 0 PID: 533 Comm: bash Not tainted 3.15.0-0.rc1.git1.1.fc21.x86_64 #1
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
 0000000000000000 00000000d664ff3c ffff880078b69a70 ffffffff817e82e0
 0000000000000000 ffff880078b69a98 ffffffff810cf1a4 0000000000000050
 0000000000000050 ffff88007cc01a00 ffff880078b69ad8 ffffffff8121449e
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff817e82e0>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x66
 [<ffffffff810cf1a4>] __might_sleep+0x184/0x240
 [<ffffffff8121449e>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x4e/0x330
 [<ffffffffa0331124>] ? nfs4_release_lockowner+0x74/0x110 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa0331124>] nfs4_release_lockowner+0x74/0x110 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa0352340>] nfs4_put_lock_state+0x90/0xb0 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa0352375>] nfs4_fl_release_lock+0x15/0x20 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffff81297515>] locks_free_lock+0x45/0x90
 [<ffffffff8129996c>] flock_lock_file_wait+0x11c/0x3a0
 [<ffffffffa033da6a>] ? nfs4_proc_lock+0x26a/0x910 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa033301e>] do_vfs_lock+0x1e/0x30 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa033da79>] nfs4_proc_lock+0x279/0x910 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffff810dbb26>] ? local_clock+0x16/0x30
 [<ffffffff810f5a3f>] ? lock_release_holdtime.part.28+0xf/0x200
 [<ffffffffa02f820c>] do_unlk+0x8c/0xc0 [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa02f85c5>] nfs_flock+0xa5/0xf0 [nfs]
 [<ffffffff8129a6f6>] locks_remove_file+0xb6/0x1e0
 [<ffffffff812159d8>] ? kfree+0xd8/0x2d0
 [<ffffffff8123bc63>] __fput+0xd3/0x210
 [<ffffffff8123bdee>] ____fput+0xe/0x10
 [<ffffffff810bfb6d>] task_work_run+0xcd/0xf0
 [<ffffffff81019cd1>] do_notify_resume+0x61/0x90
 [<ffffffff817fbea2>] int_signal+0x12/0x17

The problem is that NFSv4 is trying to do an allocation from
fl_release_private (in order to send a RELEASE_LOCKOWNER call). That
function can be called while holding the inode->i_lock, and it's
currently set up to do __GFP_WAIT allocations. v4.1 code has a
similar problem.

This patch adds a work_struct to the nfs4_lock_state and has the code
queue the free_lock_state operation to nfsiod.
Reported-by: NJosh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
上级 8003d3c4
...@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct nfs4_lock_state { ...@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ struct nfs4_lock_state {
nfs4_stateid ls_stateid; nfs4_stateid ls_stateid;
atomic_t ls_count; atomic_t ls_count;
fl_owner_t ls_owner; fl_owner_t ls_owner;
struct work_struct ls_release;
}; };
/* bits for nfs4_state->flags */ /* bits for nfs4_state->flags */
......
...@@ -799,6 +799,18 @@ __nfs4_find_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, fl_owner_t fl_owner) ...@@ -799,6 +799,18 @@ __nfs4_find_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, fl_owner_t fl_owner)
return NULL; return NULL;
} }
static void
free_lock_state_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp = container_of(work,
struct nfs4_lock_state, ls_release);
struct nfs4_state *state = lsp->ls_state;
struct nfs_server *server = state->owner->so_server;
struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client;
clp->cl_mvops->free_lock_state(server, lsp);
}
/* /*
* Return a compatible lock_state. If no initialized lock_state structure * Return a compatible lock_state. If no initialized lock_state structure
* exists, return an uninitialized one. * exists, return an uninitialized one.
...@@ -820,6 +832,7 @@ static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_alloc_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, f ...@@ -820,6 +832,7 @@ static struct nfs4_lock_state *nfs4_alloc_lock_state(struct nfs4_state *state, f
if (lsp->ls_seqid.owner_id < 0) if (lsp->ls_seqid.owner_id < 0)
goto out_free; goto out_free;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lsp->ls_locks); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&lsp->ls_locks);
INIT_WORK(&lsp->ls_release, free_lock_state_work);
return lsp; return lsp;
out_free: out_free:
kfree(lsp); kfree(lsp);
...@@ -883,13 +896,12 @@ void nfs4_put_lock_state(struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp) ...@@ -883,13 +896,12 @@ void nfs4_put_lock_state(struct nfs4_lock_state *lsp)
if (list_empty(&state->lock_states)) if (list_empty(&state->lock_states))
clear_bit(LK_STATE_IN_USE, &state->flags); clear_bit(LK_STATE_IN_USE, &state->flags);
spin_unlock(&state->state_lock); spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
if (test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lsp->ls_flags))
queue_work(nfsiod_workqueue, &lsp->ls_release);
else {
server = state->owner->so_server; server = state->owner->so_server;
if (test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lsp->ls_flags)) {
struct nfs_client *clp = server->nfs_client;
clp->cl_mvops->free_lock_state(server, lsp);
} else
nfs4_free_lock_state(server, lsp); nfs4_free_lock_state(server, lsp);
}
} }
static void nfs4_fl_copy_lock(struct file_lock *dst, struct file_lock *src) static void nfs4_fl_copy_lock(struct file_lock *dst, struct file_lock *src)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册