提交 20d65236 编写于 作者: J Junaid Shahid 提交者: Paolo Bonzini

kvm: x86: mmu: Update comment in mark_spte_for_access_track

Reword the comment to hopefully make it more clear.
Signed-off-by: NJunaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
上级 312b616b
...@@ -708,9 +708,9 @@ static u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte) ...@@ -708,9 +708,9 @@ static u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte)
return spte; return spte;
/* /*
* Verify that the write-protection that we do below will be fixable * Making an Access Tracking PTE will result in removal of write access
* via the fast page fault path. Currently, that is always the case, at * from the PTE. So, verify that we will be able to restore the write
* least when using EPT (which is when access tracking would be used). * access in the fast page fault path later on.
*/ */
WARN_ONCE((spte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK) && WARN_ONCE((spte & PT_WRITABLE_MASK) &&
!spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte), !spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(spte),
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册