From 0cc2764cc4a4bd73df55f8893c871778cf7ddd0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2012 22:59:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: use cpu_relax() in wait_for_atomic

As part of the advice given to us from the hardware designers regarding
the maximum wait time on the forcewake handshake we need to move from us
granularity to ms granularity. In earlier patches to do this, Jani
noticed that wait_for_us was properly converted to use cpu_relax(), but
wait_for was not.

The issue has existed since the introduction of the macro:
commit 913d8d110078788c14812dce8bb62c37946821d2
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Sat Aug 7 11:01:35 2010 +0100

    drm/i915: Ensure that while(INREG()) are bounded (v2)

CC: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.oc.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
index ee0beb4833fb..3f7eefc5d976 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -41,7 +41,11 @@
 			ret__ = -ETIMEDOUT;				\
 			break;						\
 		}							\
-		if (W && drm_can_sleep()) msleep(W);	\
+		if (W && drm_can_sleep())  {				\
+			msleep(W);					\
+		} else {						\
+			cpu_relax();					\
+		}							\
 	}								\
 	ret__;								\
 })
-- 
GitLab