Build uset targers as true PIE if user want to keep qemu
self-virtualizable.

v5:
  - Split into to patches: drop link hack and add PIE support
  - do not build PIE by default and drop toolchain check

v4:
  - Add test for toolchain if it has proper PIE support

v3:
  - One more pice of the hack was removed
  - Description updated

v2:
  - Add configure options do enable/disable PIE for usermode targets.
    Disabling can be useful if you build uswing toolchain which has
    broken PIE support. PIE for usermode targets enabled by default.
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

There is a link hack in linux-user which produces an executable that
looks like PIE, but always has text relocations since all object files
isn't position-independent (compiled without -fpic/-fpie). Dynamic loader
has to do more work to load a binary with text relocations.

The best way to keep this functionality is to build a true PIE without
text relocations.
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Usermode targets are hardware-independed.
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Acked-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

We need to define _XOPEN_SOURCE and __EXTENSIONS__ macros in order to get
CMSG_ and TIOCWIN macros defined. But then _POSIX_C_SOURCE gets defined, which
is (incorrectly) used as an indicator for existence of posix_memalign() in osdep.c.
Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Problem: Our file sys-queue.h is a copy of the BSD file, but there are
some additions and it's not entirely compatible. Because of that, there have
been conflicts with system headers on BSD systems. Some hacks have been
introduced in the commits 15cc9235,
f40d7537,
96555a96 and
3990d09a but the fixes were fragile.

Solution: Avoid the conflict entirely by renaming the functions and the
file. Revert the previous hacks.
Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NBlue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>

And untabify this while we are at it.
Signed-off-by: Nmalc <av1474@comtv.ru>

Signed-off-by: Nmalc <av1474@comtv.ru>

Signed-off-by: Nmalc <av1474@comtv.ru>

Signed-off-by: Nmalc <av1474@comtv.ru>

Signed-off-by: Nmalc <av1474@comtv.ru>

Signed-off-by: Nmalc <av1474@comtv.ru>

Signed-off-by: Nmalc <av1474@comtv.ru>

Direct call to kvm_arch_get_registers() bypass logic in
cpu_synchronize_state()
Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

We can't move fifo back to an embeded array because it needs to be aligned
Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

This naming was used in kvm tree, and is easier to remember
Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

vmsd alone is not enugh, because we can have several structs saved with the same description (vmsd).
Signed-off-by: NJuan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>