From f8dccbb63463d72dcf273b583d41810a01feab26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:46:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: consider git extended headers valid patches Renames look like this with git-diff(1) when diff.renames = true is set: diff --git a/a b/b similarity index 100% rename from a rename to b This raises the "Does not appear to be a unified-diff format patch" error because checkpatch.pl only considers a diff valid if it contains at least one "@@" hunk. This patch accepts renames and copies too so that checkpatch.pl exits successfully when a diff only renames/copies files. The git diff extended header format is described on the git-diff(1) man page. Reported-by: Colin Lord Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi Reviewed-by: Eric Blake Message-id: 1468576014-28788-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi --- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index cf32c8f5fa..afa7f79f83 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -1279,6 +1279,11 @@ sub process { } } +# Accept git diff extended headers as valid patches + if ($line =~ /^(?:rename|copy) (?:from|to) [\w\/\.\-]+\s*$/) { + $is_patch = 1; + } + #check the patch for a signoff: if ($line =~ /^\s*signed-off-by:/i) { # This is a signoff, if ugly, so do not double report. -- GitLab