block: Don't inactivate children before parents
bdrv_child_cb_inactivate() asserts that parents are already inactive when children get inactivated. This precondition is necessary because parents could still issue requests in their inactivation code. When block nodes are created individually with -blockdev, all of them are monitor owned and will be returned by bdrv_next() in an undefined order (in practice, in the order of their creation, which is usually children before parents), which obviously fails the assertion: qemu: block.c:899: bdrv_child_cb_inactivate: Assertion `bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_INACTIVE' failed. This patch fixes the ordering by skipping nodes with still active parents in bdrv_inactivate_recurse() because we know that they will be covered by recursion when the last active parent becomes inactive. With the correct parents-before-children ordering, we also got rid of the reason why commit aad0b7a0 introduced two passes, so we can go back to a single-pass recursion. This is necessary so we can rely on the BDRV_O_INACTIVE flag to skip nodes with active parents (the flag used to be set only in pass 2, so we would always skip non-root nodes in pass 1 because all parents would still be considered active; setting the flag in pass 1 would mean, that we never skip anything in pass 2 because all parents are already considered inactive). Because of the change to single pass, this patch is best reviewed with whitespace changes ignored. Signed-off-by: NKevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录