提交 850d5e33 编写于 作者: P Peter Maydell 提交者: Laurent Vivier

linux-user: Suppress address-of-packed-member warnings in __get/put_user_e

Our __get_user_e() and __put_user_e() macros cause newer versions
of clang to generate false-positive -Waddress-of-packed-member
warnings if they are passed the address of a member of a packed
struct (see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39113).
Suppress these using the _Pragma() operator. Unfortunately
_Pragma() support in gcc is broken in some gcc versions and
in some usage contexts, so we limit the pragma usage here to clang.

To put in the pragmas we need to convert the macros from
expressions to statements, but all the callsites effectively
treat them as statements already so this is OK.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NLaurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Reviewed-by: NRichard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20181009161814.21257-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
上级 77f7c747
......@@ -461,27 +461,59 @@ static inline int access_ok(int type, abi_ulong addr, abi_ulong size)
These are usually used to access struct data members once the struct has
been locked - usually with lock_user_struct. */
/* Tricky points:
- Use __builtin_choose_expr to avoid type promotion from ?:,
- Invalid sizes result in a compile time error stemming from
the fact that abort has no parameters.
- It's easier to use the endian-specific unaligned load/store
functions than host-endian unaligned load/store plus tswapN. */
/*
* Tricky points:
* - Use __builtin_choose_expr to avoid type promotion from ?:,
* - Invalid sizes result in a compile time error stemming from
* the fact that abort has no parameters.
* - It's easier to use the endian-specific unaligned load/store
* functions than host-endian unaligned load/store plus tswapN.
* - The pragmas are necessary only to silence a clang false-positive
* warning: see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39113 .
* - We have to disable -Wpragmas warnings to avoid a complaint about
* an unknown warning type from older compilers that don't know about
* -Waddress-of-packed-member.
* - gcc has bugs in its _Pragma() support in some versions, eg
* https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83256 -- so we only
* include the warning-suppression pragmas for clang
*/
#ifdef __clang__
#define PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING \
_Pragma("GCC diagnostic push"); \
_Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Wpragmas\""); \
_Pragma("GCC diagnostic ignored \"-Waddress-of-packed-member\"")
#define PRAGMA_REENABLE_PACKED_WARNING \
_Pragma("GCC diagnostic pop")
#else
#define PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING
#define PRAGMA_REENABLE_PACKED_WARNING
#endif
#define __put_user_e(x, hptr, e) \
do { \
PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING; \
(__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 1, stb_p, \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 2, stw_##e##_p, \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 4, stl_##e##_p, \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 8, stq_##e##_p, abort)))) \
((hptr), (x)), (void)0)
((hptr), (x)), (void)0); \
PRAGMA_REENABLE_PACKED_WARNING; \
} while (0)
#define __get_user_e(x, hptr, e) \
do { \
PRAGMA_DISABLE_PACKED_WARNING; \
((x) = (typeof(*hptr))( \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 1, ldub_p, \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 2, lduw_##e##_p, \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 4, ldl_##e##_p, \
__builtin_choose_expr(sizeof(*(hptr)) == 8, ldq_##e##_p, abort)))) \
(hptr)), (void)0)
(hptr)), (void)0); \
PRAGMA_REENABLE_PACKED_WARNING; \
} while (0)
#ifdef TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN
# define __put_user(x, hptr) __put_user_e(x, hptr, be)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册