block/backup: use backup-top instead of write notifiers
Drop write notifiers and use filter node instead. = Changes = 1. Add filter-node-name argument for backup qmp api. We have to do it in this commit, as 257 needs to be fixed. 2. There are no more write notifiers here, so is_write_notifier parameter is dropped from block-copy paths. 3. To sync with in-flight requests at job finish we now have drained removing of the filter, we don't need rw-lock. 4. Block-copy is now using BdrvChildren instead of BlockBackends 5. As backup-top owns these children, we also move block-copy state into backup-top's ownership. = Iotest changes = 56: op-blocker doesn't shoot now, as we set it on source, but then check on filter, when trying to start second backup. To keep the test we instead can catch another collision: both jobs will get 'drive0' job-id, as job-id parameter is unspecified. To prevent interleaving with file-posix locks (as they are dependent on config) let's use another target for second backup. Also, it's obvious now that we'd like to drop this op-blocker at all and add a test-case for two backups from one node (to different destinations) actually works. But not in these series. 141: Output changed: prepatch, "Node is in use" comes from bdrv_has_blk check inside qmp_blockdev_del. But we've dropped block-copy blk objects, so no more blk objects on source bs (job blk is on backup-top filter bs). New message is from op-blocker, which is the next check in qmp_blockdev_add. 257: The test wants to emulate guest write during backup. They should go to filter node, not to original source node, of course. Therefore we need to specify filter node name and use it. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> Message-id: 20191001131409.14202-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com Reviewed-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NMax Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录