storage_util: Prefer generic FICLONE over btrfs/xfs defines
After my change to the original patch that resulted in commit 8ed874b3 it was brought to my attention that all three defines are the same: FICLONE = BTRFS_IOC_CLONE = XFS_IOC_CLONE (as documented in ioctl_ficlone(2)). Therefore we should prefer generic FICLONE over 'specific' defines for btrfs/xfs. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录