- 13 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
movnt* instructions are not strongly ordered with respect to other stores, so if we are to assume stores are strongly ordered in the rest of the 64 bit code, we must fence these off (see similar examples in 32 bit code). [ The AMD memory ordering document seems to say that nontemporal stores can also pass earlier regular stores, so maybe we need sfences _before_ movnt* everywhere too? ] Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
This does user copies in fs write() into the page cache with write combining. This pushes the destination out of the CPU's cache, but allows higher bandwidth in some case. The theory is that the page cache data is usually not touched by the CPU again and it's better to not pollute the cache with it. Also it is a little faster. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
-