Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 13 11月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 27 9月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      perf tests: Fix flaky test 'Object code reading' · 0f892fd1
      由 James Clark 提交于 
      This test occasionally fails on aarch64 when a sample is taken in
free@plt and it fails with "Bytes read differ from those read by
objdump".

This is because that symbol is near a section boundary in the elf file.
Despite the -z option to always output zeros, objdump uses
bfd_map_over_sections() to iterate through the elf file so it doesn't
see outside of the sections where these zeros are and can't print them.

For example this boundary proceeds free@plt in libc with a gap of 48
bytes between .plt and .text:

  objdump -d -z --start-address=0x23cc8 --stop-address=0x23d08 libc-2.30.so

  libc-2.30.so:     file format elf64-littleaarch64

  Disassembly of section .plt:

  0000000000023cc8 <*ABS*+0x7fd00@plt+0x8>:
     23cc8:	91018210 	add	x16, x16, #0x60
     23ccc:	d61f0220 	br	x17

  Disassembly of section .text:

  0000000000023d00 <abort@@GLIBC_2.17-0x98>:
     23d00:	a9bf7bfd 	stp	x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
     23d04:	910003fd 	mov	x29, sp

Taking a sample in free@plt is very rare because it is so small, but the
test can be forced to fail almost every time on any platform by linking
the test with a shared library that has a single empty function and
calling it in a loop.

The fix is to zero the buffers so that when there is a jump in the
addresses output by objdump, zeros are already filled in between.
Signed-off-by: NJames Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210906152238.3415467-1-james.clark@arm.comSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      0f892fd1
  5. 17 9月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 24 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 07 3月, 2021 1 次提交
    • N
      perf test: Fix cpu and thread map leaks in code_reading test · e06c3ca4
      由 Namhyung Kim 提交于 
      The evlist and the cpu/thread maps should be released together.
Otherwise following error was reported by Asan.

Note that this test still has memory leaks in DSOs so it still fails
even after this change.  I'll take a look at that too.

  # perf test -v 26
  26: Object code reading                        :
  --- start ---
  test child forked, pid 154184
  Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long)
  symsrc__init: build id mismatch for vmlinux.
  symsrc__init: cannot get elf header.
  Using /proc/kcore for kernel data
  Using /proc/kallsyms for symbols
  Parsing event 'cycles'
  mmap size 528384B
  ...
  =================================================================
  ==154184==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks

  Direct leak of 439 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fcb66e77037 in __interceptor_calloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:154
    #1 0x55ad9b7e821e in dso__new_id util/dso.c:1256
    #2 0x55ad9b8cfd4a in __machine__addnew_vdso util/vdso.c:132
    #3 0x55ad9b8cfd4a in machine__findnew_vdso util/vdso.c:347
    #4 0x55ad9b845b7e in map__new util/map.c:176
    #5 0x55ad9b8415a2 in machine__process_mmap2_event util/machine.c:1787
    #6 0x55ad9b8fab16 in perf_tool__process_synth_event util/synthetic-events.c:64
    #7 0x55ad9b8fab16 in perf_event__synthesize_mmap_events util/synthetic-events.c:499
    #8 0x55ad9b8fbfdf in __event__synthesize_thread util/synthetic-events.c:741
    #9 0x55ad9b8ff3e3 in perf_event__synthesize_thread_map util/synthetic-events.c:833
    #10 0x55ad9b738585 in do_test_code_reading tests/code-reading.c:608
    #11 0x55ad9b73b25d in test__code_reading tests/code-reading.c:722
    #12 0x55ad9b6f28fb in run_test tests/builtin-test.c:428
    #13 0x55ad9b6f28fb in test_and_print tests/builtin-test.c:458
    #14 0x55ad9b6f4a53 in __cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:679
    #15 0x55ad9b6f4a53 in cmd_test tests/builtin-test.c:825
    #16 0x55ad9b760cc4 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:313
    #17 0x55ad9b5eaa88 in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:365
    #18 0x55ad9b5eaa88 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:409
    #19 0x55ad9b5eaa88 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:539
    #20 0x7fcb669acd09 in __libc_start_main ../csu/libc-start.c:308

    ...
  SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 471 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
  test child finished with 1
  ---- end ----
  Object code reading: FAILED!
Signed-off-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210301140409.184570-6-namhyung@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      e06c3ca4
  11. 18 2月, 2021 1 次提交
    • F
      perf tools: Add OCaml demangling · cef7af25
      由 Fabian Hemmer 提交于 
      Detect symbols generated by the OCaml compiler based on their prefix.

Demangle OCaml symbols, returning a newly allocated string (like the
existing Java demangling functionality).

Move a helper function (hex) from tests/code-reading.c to util/string.c

To test:

  echo 'Printf.printf "%d\n" (Random.int 42)' > test.ml
  perf record ocamlopt.opt test.ml
  perf report -d ocamlopt.opt
Signed-off-by: NFabian Hemmer <copy@copy.sh>
Acked-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
LPU-Reference: 20210203211537.b25ytjb6dq5jfbwx@nyu
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      cef7af25
  13. 01 12月, 2020 2 次提交
  15. 30 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 23 6月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 26 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 10 10月, 2019 4 次提交
  23. 25 9月, 2019 5 次提交
  25. 20 9月, 2019 2 次提交
  27. 01 9月, 2019 2 次提交
  29. 30 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 26 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 30 7月, 2019 14 次提交