1. 15 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • P
      gpio: don't include module.h in shared driver header · d47529b2
      Paul Gortmaker 提交于
      Most shared headers in include/linux don't need to know what the
      internals of a struct module are; all they care about is that it
      is a struct and hence they may require a pointer to one.
      
      The advantage in this is that module.h is including a lot of stuff
      itself, and an otherwise empty C file that just contains module.h
      will result in ~750kB from CPP (compared to say 12kB from init.h)
      
      So we have approximately 50 instances of "struct module;" in the
      various include/linux headers already that help us keep module.h
      out of other headers; here we do the same for gpio.
      
      Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
      Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      d47529b2
  2. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      gpio: support native single-ended hardware drivers · c663e5f5
      Linus Walleij 提交于
      Some GPIO controllers has a special hardware bit we can flip
      to support open drain / source. This means that on these hardwares
      we do not need to emulate OD/OS by setting the line to input
      instead of actively driving it high/low. Add an optional vtable
      callback to the driver set_single_ended() so that driver can
      implement this in hardware if they have it.
      
      We may need a pinctrl_gpio_set_config() call at some point to
      propagate this down to a backing pin control device on systems
      with split GPIO/pin control.
      Reported-by: NMichael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      c663e5f5
  3. 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  4. 19 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 16 2月, 2016 3 次提交
  6. 12 2月, 2016 3 次提交
  7. 09 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      gpio: make the gpiochip a real device · ff2b1359
      Linus Walleij 提交于
      GPIO chips have been around for years, but were never real devices,
      instead they were piggy-backing on a parent device (such as a
      platform_device or amba_device) but this was always optional.
      GPIO chips could also exist without any device at all, with its
      struct device *parent (ex *dev) pointer being set to null.
      
      When sysfs was in use, a mock device would be created, with the
      optional parent assigned, or just floating orphaned with NULL
      as parent.
      
      If sysfs is active, it will use this device as parent.
      
      We now create a gpio_device struct containing a real
      struct device and move the subsystem over to using that. The
      list of struct gpio_chip:s is augmented to hold struct
      gpio_device:s and we find gpio_chips:s by first looking up
      the struct gpio_device.
      
      The struct gpio_device is designed to stay around even if the
      gpio_chip is removed, so as to satisfy users in userspace
      that need a backing data structure to hold the state of the
      session initiated with e.g. a character device even if there is
      no physical chip anymore.
      
      From this point on, gpiochips are devices.
      
      Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Michael Welling <mwelling@ieee.org>
      Cc: Markus Pargmann <mpa@pengutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      ff2b1359
  8. 13 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      gpio: generic: make bgpio_pdata always visible · c474e348
      Arnd Bergmann 提交于
      Board files that define their own bgpio_pdata are broken when
      CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC is disabled and the bgpio_pdata structure
      definition is hidden by the #ifdef:
      
      arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c:148:15: error: variable 'autcpu12_mmgpio_pdata' has initializer but incomplete type
       static struct bgpio_pdata autcpu12_mmgpio_pdata __initdata = {
      arch/arm/mach-clps711x/board-autcpu12.c:149:2: error: unknown field 'base' specified in initializer
        .base = AUTCPU12_MMGPIO_BASE,
      
      Since the board files should generally not care what drivers are
      enabled, this makes the structure definition visible again.
      Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Fixes: 0f4630f3 ("gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct")
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      c474e348
  9. 05 1月, 2016 2 次提交
    • L
      gpio: generic: factor into gpio_chip struct · 0f4630f3
      Linus Walleij 提交于
      The separate struct bgpio_chip has been a pain to handle, both
      by being confusingly similar in name to struct gpio_chip and
      for being contained inside a struct so that struct gpio_chip
      is contained in a struct contained in a struct, making several
      steps of dereferencing necessary.
      
      Make things simpler: include the fields directly into
      <linux/gpio/driver.h>, #ifdef:ed for CONFIG_GENERIC_GPIO, and
      get rid of the <linux/basic_mmio_gpio.h> altogether. Prefix
      some of the member variables with bgpio_* and add proper
      kerneldoc while we're at it.
      
      Modify all users to handle the change and use a struct
      gpio_chip directly. And while we're at it: replace all
      container_of() dereferencing by gpiochip_get_data() and
      registering the gpio_chip with gpiochip_add_data().
      
      Cc: arm@kernel.org
      Cc: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
      Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
      Cc: Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>
      Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
      Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
      Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
      Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
      Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
      Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
      Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
      Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
      Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
      Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
      Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
      Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
      Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
      Acked-by: NGregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NLiviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
      Acked-by: NH Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
      Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Acked-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
      Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      0f4630f3
    • L
      gpio: add a data pointer to gpio_chip · b08ea35a
      Linus Walleij 提交于
      This adds a void * pointer to gpio_chip so that driver can
      assign and retrieve some states. This is done to get rid of
      container_of() calls for gpio_chips embedded inside state
      containers, so we can remove the need to have the gpio_chip
      or later (planned) struct gpio_device be dynamically allocated
      at registration time, so that its struct device can be properly
      reference counted and not bound to its parent device (e.g.
      a platform_device) but instead live on after unregistration
      if it is opened by e.g. a char device or sysfs.
      
      The data is added with the new function gpiochip_add_data()
      and for compatibility we add static inline wrapper function
      gpiochip_add() that will call gpiochip_add_data() with
      NULL as argument. The latter will be removed once we have
      exorcised gpiochip_add() from the kernel.
      
      gpiochip_get_data() is added as a static inline accessor
      for drivers to quickly get their data out.
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      b08ea35a
  10. 27 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • V
      gpio: update gpiochip .get() callback description · 60befd2e
      Vladimir Zapolskiy 提交于
      Since gpiochip .get() callback may return a negative error value, it
      strictly limits the range of possible non-error returned values to
      a subset of [30:0] bitmask, however on practice on success all
      gpiochip drivers return either 0 for low signal or 1 for high signal,
      this is assured by "gpio: *: Be sure to clamp return value" series of
      changes. To avoid any confusion, misinterpretation and potential
      errors while developing gpiochip drivers in future convert this
      implicit assumption to a mandatory rule.
      
      For output signals with unknown output signal state gpiochip drivers
      should return a negative error instead of 0.
      Signed-off-by: NVladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir_zapolskiy@mentor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      60befd2e
  11. 19 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • L
      gpio: change member .dev to .parent · 58383c78
      Linus Walleij 提交于
      The name .dev in a struct is normally reserved for a struct device
      that is let us say a superclass to the thing described by the struct.
      struct gpio_chip stands out by confusingly using a struct device *dev
      to point to the parent device (such as a platform_device) that
      represents the hardware. As we want to give gpio_chip:s real devices,
      this is not working. We need to rename this member to parent.
      
      This was done by two coccinelle scripts, I guess it is possible to
      combine them into one, but I don't know such stuff. They look like
      this:
      
      @@
      struct gpio_chip *var;
      @@
      -var->dev
      +var->parent
      
      and:
      
      @@
      struct gpio_chip var;
      @@
      -var.dev
      +var.parent
      
      and:
      
      @@
      struct bgpio_chip *var;
      @@
      -var->gc.dev
      +var->gc.parent
      
      Plus a few instances of bgpio that I couldn't figure out how
      to teach Coccinelle to rewrite.
      
      This patch hits all over the place, but I *strongly* prefer this
      solution to any piecemal approaches that just exercise patch
      mechanics all over the place. It mainly hits drivers/gpio and
      drivers/pinctrl which is my own backyard anyway.
      
      Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
      Cc: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
      Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>
      Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
      Cc: Alek Du <alek.du@intel.com>
      Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
      Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
      Acked-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
      Acked-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      Acked-by: NHans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
      Acked-by: NJacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      58383c78
  12. 17 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  13. 26 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  14. 17 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • G
      gpiolib: irqchip: use different lockdep class for each gpio irqchip · a0a8bcf4
      Grygorii Strashko 提交于
      Since IRQ chip helpers were introduced drivers lose ability to
      register separate lockdep classes for each registered GPIO IRQ
      chip and the gpiolib now is using shared lockdep class for
      all GPIO IRQ chips (gpiochip_irq_lock_class).
      As result, lockdep will produce warning when there are min two
      stacked GPIO chips and all of them are interrupt controllers.
      
      HW configuration which generates lockdep warning (TI dra7-evm):
      
      [SOC GPIO bankA.gpioX]
        <- irq - [pcf875x.gpioY]
                  <- irq - DevZ.enable_irq_wake(pcf_gpioY_irq);
      The issue was reported in [1] and discussed [2].
      
      =============================================
      [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
      4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55 Not tainted
      ---------------------------------------------
      sh/63 is trying to acquire lock:
       (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
      
      but task is already holding lock:
       (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
       Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
             CPU0
             ----
        lock(class);
        lock(class);
      
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
       May be due to missing lock nesting notation
      
      7 locks held by sh/63:
       #0:  (sb_writers#4){.+.+.+}, at: [<c016bbb8>] vfs_write+0x13c/0x164
       #1:  (&of->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c01debf4>] kernfs_fop_write+0x4c/0x1a0
       #2:  (s_active#36){.+.+.+}, at: [<c01debfc>] kernfs_fop_write+0x54/0x1a0
       #3:  (pm_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009758c>] pm_suspend+0xec/0x4c4
       #4:  (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<c03f77f8>] __device_suspend+0xd4/0x398
       #5:  (&gpio->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c009b940>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x74/0x94
       #6:  (class){......}, at: [<c009b91c>] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94
      
      stack backtrace:
      CPU: 0 PID: 63 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.2.0-rc6-00013-g5d050ed-dirty #55
      Hardware name: Generic DRA74X (Flattened Device Tree)
      [<c0016e24>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0013338>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
      [<c0013338>] (show_stack) from [<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack+0x84/0x9c)
      [<c05f6b24>] (dump_stack) from [<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire+0x19c0/0x1e20)
      [<c00903f4>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c0091098>] (lock_acquire+0xa8/0x128)
      [<c0091098>] (lock_acquire) from [<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x38/0x4c)
      [<c05fd61c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave) from [<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock+0x50/0x94)
      [<c009b91c>] (__irq_get_desc_lock) from [<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x20/0xfc)
      [<c009c4f4>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake+0x24/0x54)
      [<c0393ac4>] (pcf857x_irq_set_wake) from [<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake+0x8c/0xfc)
      [<c009c560>] (irq_set_irq_wake) from [<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend+0x70/0xd4)
      [<c04a02ac>] (gpio_keys_suspend) from [<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback+0x50/0x124)
      [<c03f6a00>] (dpm_run_callback) from [<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend+0x10c/0x398)
      [<c03f7830>] (__device_suspend) from [<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend+0x134/0x2f4)
      [<c03f90f0>] (dpm_suspend) from [<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter+0xa8/0x728)
      [<c0096e20>] (suspend_devices_and_enter) from [<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend+0x32c/0x4c4)
      [<c00977cc>] (pm_suspend) from [<c0096060>] (state_store+0x64/0xb8)
      [<c0096060>] (state_store) from [<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xbc/0x1a0)
      [<c01dec64>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c016b280>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0xd8)
      [<c016b280>] (__vfs_write) from [<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write+0x90/0x164)
      [<c016bb0c>] (vfs_write) from [<c016c330>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x9c)
      [<c016c330>] (SyS_write) from [<c000f500>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x54)
      
      Lets fix it by using separate lockdep class for each registered GPIO
      IRQ Chip. This is done by wrapping gpiochip_irqchip_add call into macros.
      
      The implementation of this patch inspired by solution done by Nicolas
      Boichat for regmap [3]
      
      [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg05844.html
      [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-gpio/msg06021.html
      [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg429834.html
      
      Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
      Reported-by: NRoger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
      Tested-by: NRoger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      a0a8bcf4
  15. 16 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  16. 14 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  17. 13 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  18. 12 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 19 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  20. 27 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      gpiolib: allow simultaneous setting of multiple GPIO outputs · 5f424243
      Rojhalat Ibrahim 提交于
      Introduce new functions gpiod_set_array & gpiod_set_raw_array to the consumer
      interface which allow setting multiple outputs with just one function call.
      Also add an optional set_multiple function to the driver interface. Without an
      implementation of that function in the chip driver outputs are set
      sequentially.
      
      Implementing the set_multiple function in a chip driver allows for:
      - Improved performance for certain use cases. The original motivation for this
        was the task of configuring an FPGA. In that specific case, where 9 GPIO
        lines have to be set many times, configuration time goes down from 48 s to
        20 s when using the new function.
      - Simultaneous glitch-free setting of multiple pins on any kind of parallel
        bus attached to GPIOs provided they all reside on the same chip and bank.
      
      Limitations:
        Performance is only improved for normal high-low outputs. Open drain and
        open source outputs are always set separately from each other. Those kinds
        of outputs could probably be accelerated in a similar way if we could
        forgo the error checking when setting GPIO directions.
      
      Change log:
        v6: - rebase on current linux-gpio devel branch
        v5: - check can_sleep property per chip
            - remove superfluous checks
            - supplement documentation
        v4: - add gpiod_set_array function for setting logical values
            - change interface of the set_multiple driver function to use
              unsigned long as type for the bit fields
            - use generic bitops (which also use unsigned long for bit fields)
            - do not use ARCH_NR_GPIOS any more
        v3: - add documentation
            - change commit message
        v2: - use descriptor interface
            - allow arbitrary groups of GPIOs spanning multiple chips
      Signed-off-by: NRojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de>
      Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      5f424243
  21. 29 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  22. 24 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 23 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  24. 05 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 29 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  26. 28 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  27. 24 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  28. 23 7月, 2014 3 次提交
  29. 29 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • L
      gpio: support threaded interrupts in irqchip helpers · 1c8732bb
      Linus Walleij 提交于
      Some off-chip GPIO expanders need to be communicated by I2C or
      SPI traffic, but may still support IRQs. By the sleeping nature
      of such buses, such IRQ handlers need to be threaded. Support
      such handlers in the gpiochip irqchip helpers by flagging IRQs
      as threaded if the .can_sleep property of the gpiochip is
      true.
      
      Helpfully deny registration of chained IRQ handlers if the
      .can_sleep property is set, as such chips will invariably need
      a nested handler rather than a chained handler.
      
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      1c8732bb
  30. 29 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  31. 26 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  32. 13 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  33. 09 12月, 2013 1 次提交