1. 20 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  2. 05 3月, 2008 1 次提交
    • E
      alloc_percpu() fails to allocate percpu data · be852795
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      Some oprofile results obtained while using tbench on a 2x2 cpu machine were
      very surprising.
      
      For example, loopback_xmit() function was using high number of cpu cycles
      to perform the statistic updates, supposed to be real cheap since they use
      percpu data
      
              pcpu_lstats = netdev_priv(dev);
              lb_stats = per_cpu_ptr(pcpu_lstats, smp_processor_id());
              lb_stats->packets++;  /* HERE : serious contention */
              lb_stats->bytes += skb->len;
      
      struct pcpu_lstats is a small structure containing two longs.  It appears
      that on my 32bits platform, alloc_percpu(8) allocates a single cache line,
      instead of giving to each cpu a separate cache line.
      
      Using the following patch gave me impressive boost in various benchmarks
      ( 6 % in tbench)
      (all percpu_counters hit this bug too)
      
      Long term fix (ie >= 2.6.26) would be to let each CPU allocate their own
      block of memory, so that we dont need to roudup sizes to L1_CACHE_BYTES, or
      merging the SGI stuff of course...
      
      Note : SLUB vs SLAB is important here to *show* the improvement, since they
      dont have the same minimum allocation sizes (8 bytes vs 32 bytes).  This
      could very well explain regressions some guys reported when they switched
      to SLUB.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
      Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      be852795
  3. 07 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 26 9月, 2006 1 次提交