1. 28 9月, 2014 2 次提交
  2. 04 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 07 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • E
      tcp: remove 1ms offset in srtt computation · 4a5ab4e2
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      TCP pacing depends on an accurate srtt estimation.
      
      Current srtt estimation is using jiffie resolution,
      and has an artificial offset of at least 1 ms, which can produce
      slowdowns when FQ/pacing is used, especially in DC world,
      where typical rtt is below 1 ms.
      
      We are planning a switch to usec resolution for linux-3.15,
      but in the meantime, this patch removes the 1 ms offset.
      
      All we need is to have tp->srtt minimal value of 1 to differentiate
      the case of srtt being initialized or not, not 8.
      
      The problematic behavior was observed on a 40Gbit testbed,
      where 32 concurrent netperf were reaching 12Gbps of aggregate
      speed, instead of line speed.
      
      This patch also has the effect of reporting more accurate srtt and send
      rates to iproute2 ss command as in :
      
      $ ss -i dst cca2
      Netid  State      Recv-Q Send-Q          Local Address:Port
      Peer Address:Port
      tcp    ESTAB      0      0                10.244.129.1:56984
      10.244.129.2:12865
      	 cubic wscale:6,6 rto:200 rtt:0.25/0.25 ato:40 mss:1448 cwnd:10 send
      463.4Mbps rcv_rtt:1 rcv_space:29200
      tcp    ESTAB      0      390960           10.244.129.1:60247
      10.244.129.2:50204
      	 cubic wscale:6,6 rto:200 rtt:0.875/0.75 mss:1448 cwnd:73 ssthresh:51
      send 966.4Mbps unacked:73 retrans:0/121 rcv_space:29200
      Reported-by: NVytautas Valancius <valas@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4a5ab4e2
  4. 30 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 27 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  6. 05 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • Y
      tcp: properly handle stretch acks in slow start · 9f9843a7
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Slow start now increases cwnd by 1 if an ACK acknowledges some packets,
      regardless the number of packets. Consequently slow start performance
      is highly dependent on the degree of the stretch ACKs caused by
      receiver or network ACK compression mechanisms (e.g., delayed-ACK,
      GRO, etc).  But slow start algorithm is to send twice the amount of
      packets of packets left so it should process a stretch ACK of degree
      N as if N ACKs of degree 1, then exits when cwnd exceeds ssthresh. A
      follow up patch will use the remainder of the N (if greater than 1)
      to adjust cwnd in the congestion avoidance phase.
      
      In addition this patch retires the experimental limited slow start
      (LSS) feature. LSS has multiple drawbacks but questionable benefit. The
      fractional cwnd increase in LSS requires a loop in slow start even
      though it's rarely used. Configuring such an increase step via a global
      sysctl on different BDPS seems hard. Finally and most importantly the
      slow start overshoot concern is now better covered by the Hybrid slow
      start (hystart) enabled by default.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      9f9843a7
  7. 28 10月, 2013 3 次提交
  8. 22 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • N
      tcp: initialize passive-side sk_pacing_rate after 3WHS · 02cf4ebd
      Neal Cardwell 提交于
      For passive TCP connections, upon receiving the ACK that completes the
      3WHS, make sure we set our pacing rate after we get our first RTT
      sample.
      
      On passive TCP connections, when we receive the ACK completing the
      3WHS we do not take an RTT sample in tcp_ack(), but rather in
      tcp_synack_rtt_meas(). So upon receiving the ACK that completes the
      3WHS, tcp_ack() leaves sk_pacing_rate at its initial value.
      
      Originally the initial sk_pacing_rate value was 0, so passive-side
      connections defaulted to sysctl_tcp_min_tso_segs (2 segs) in skbuffs
      made in the first RTT. With a default initial cwnd of 10 packets, this
      happened to be correct for RTTs 5ms or bigger, so it was hard to
      see problems in WAN or emulated WAN testing.
      
      Since 7eec4174 ("pkt_sched: fq: fix non TCP flows pacing"), the
      initial sk_pacing_rate is 0xffffffff. So after that change, passive
      TCP connections were keeping this value (and using large numbers of
      segments per skbuff) until receiving an ACK for data.
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      02cf4ebd
  9. 18 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 10 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 05 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      tcp: do not forget FIN in tcp_shifted_skb() · 5e8a402f
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      Yuchung found following problem :
      
       There are bugs in the SACK processing code, merging part in
       tcp_shift_skb_data(), that incorrectly resets or ignores the sacked
       skbs FIN flag. When a receiver first SACK the FIN sequence, and later
       throw away ofo queue (e.g., sack-reneging), the sender will stop
       retransmitting the FIN flag, and hangs forever.
      
      Following packetdrill test can be used to reproduce the bug.
      
      $ cat sack-merge-bug.pkt
      `sysctl -q net.ipv4.tcp_fack=0`
      
      // Establish a connection and send 10 MSS.
      0.000 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3
      +.000 setsockopt(3, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
      +.000 bind(3, ..., ...) = 0
      +.000 listen(3, 1) = 0
      
      +.050 < S 0:0(0) win 32792 <mss 1000,sackOK,nop,nop,nop,wscale 7>
      +.000 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 6>
      +.001 < . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 1024
      +.000 accept(3, ..., ...) = 4
      
      +.100 write(4, ..., 12000) = 12000
      +.000 shutdown(4, SHUT_WR) = 0
      +.000 > . 1:10001(10000) ack 1
      +.050 < . 1:1(0) ack 2001 win 257
      +.000 > FP. 10001:12001(2000) ack 1
      +.050 < . 1:1(0) ack 2001 win 257 <sack 10001:11001,nop,nop>
      +.050 < . 1:1(0) ack 2001 win 257 <sack 10001:12002,nop,nop>
      // SACK reneg
      +.050 < . 1:1(0) ack 12001 win 257
      +0 %{ print "unacked: ",tcpi_unacked }%
      +5 %{ print "" }%
      
      First, a typo inverted left/right of one OR operation, then
      code forgot to advance end_seq if the merged skb carried FIN.
      
      Bug was added in 2.6.29 by commit 832d11c5
      ("tcp: Try to restore large SKBs while SACK processing")
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Cc: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Acked-by: NIlpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5e8a402f
  12. 04 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 03 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      tcp: sndbuf autotuning improvements · 6ae70532
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      tcp_fixup_sndbuf() is underestimating initial send buffer requirements.
      
      It was not noticed because big GSO packets were escaping the limitation,
      but with smaller TSO packets (or TSO/GSO/SG off), application hits
      sk_sndbuf before having a chance to fill enough packets in socket write
      queue.
      
      - initial cwnd can be bigger than 10 for specific routes
      
      - SKB_TRUESIZE() is a bit under real needs in some cases,
        because of power-of-two rounding in kmalloc()
      
      - Fast Recovery (RFC 5681 3.2) : Cubic needs 70% factor
      
      - Extra cushion (application might react slowly to POLLOUT)
      
      tcp_v4_conn_req_fastopen() needs to call tcp_init_metrics() before
      calling tcp_init_buffer_space()
      
      Then we realize tcp_new_space() should call tcp_fixup_sndbuf()
      instead of duplicating this stuff.
      
      Rename tcp_fixup_sndbuf() to tcp_sndbuf_expand() to be more
      descriptive.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NMaciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6ae70532
  14. 29 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      net: introduce SO_MAX_PACING_RATE · 62748f32
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      As mentioned in commit afe4fd06 ("pkt_sched: fq: Fair Queue packet
      scheduler"), this patch adds a new socket option.
      
      SO_MAX_PACING_RATE offers the application the ability to cap the
      rate computed by transport layer. Value is in bytes per second.
      
      u32 val = 1000000;
      setsockopt(sockfd, SOL_SOCKET, SO_MAX_PACING_RATE, &val, sizeof(val));
      
      To be effectively paced, a flow must use FQ packet scheduler.
      
      Note that a packet scheduler takes into account the headers for its
      computations. The effective payload rate depends on MSS and retransmits
      if any.
      
      I chose to make this pacing rate a SOL_SOCKET option instead of a
      TCP one because this can be used by other protocols.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Cc: Steinar H. Gunderson <sesse@google.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      62748f32
  15. 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      tcp: fix dynamic right sizing · b0983d3c
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      Dynamic Right Sizing (DRS) is supposed to open TCP receive window
      automatically, but suffers from two bugs, presented by order
      of importance.
      
      1) tcp_rcv_space_adjust() fix :
      
      Using twice the last received amount is very pessimistic,
      because it doesn't allow fast recovery or proper slow start
      ramp up, if sender wants to increase cwin by 100% every RTT.
      
      copied = bytes received in previous RTT
      
      2*copied = bytes we expect to receive in next RTT
      
      4*copied = bytes we need to advertise in rwin at end of next RTT
      
      DRS is one RTT late, it needs a 4x factor.
      
      If sender is not using ABC, and increases cwin by 50% every rtt,
      then we needed 1.5*1.5 = 2.25 factor.
      This is probably why this bug was not really noticed.
      
      2) There is no window adjustment after first RTT. DRS triggers only
        after the second RTT.
        DRS needs two RTT to initialize, so tcp_fixup_rcvbuf() should setup
        sk_rcvbuf to allow proper window grow for first two RTT.
      
      This patch increases TCP efficiency particularly for large RTT flows
      when autotuning is used at the receiver, and more particularly
      in presence of packet losses.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Cc: Van Jacobson <vanj@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b0983d3c
  16. 07 9月, 2013 2 次提交
    • E
      tcp: properly increase rcv_ssthresh for ofo packets · 4e4f1fc2
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      TCP receive window handling is multi staged.
      
      A socket has a memory budget, static or dynamic, in sk_rcvbuf.
      
      Because we do not really know how this memory budget translates to
      a TCP window (payload), TCP announces a small initial window
      (about 20 MSS).
      
      When a packet is received, we increase TCP rcv_win depending
      on the payload/truesize ratio of this packet. Good citizen
      packets give a hint that it's reasonable to have rcv_win = sk_rcvbuf/2
      
      This heuristic takes place in tcp_grow_window()
      
      Problem is : We currently call tcp_grow_window() only for in-order
      packets.
      
      This means that reorders or packet losses stop proper grow of
      rcv_win, and senders are unable to benefit from fast recovery,
      or proper reordering level detection.
      
      Really, a packet being stored in OFO queue is not a bad citizen.
      It should be part of the game as in-order packets.
      
      In our traces, we very often see sender is limited by linux small
      receive windows, even if linux hosts use autotuning (DRS) and should
      allow rcv_win to grow to ~3MB.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4e4f1fc2
    • Y
      tcp: fix no cwnd growth after timeout · 16edfe7e
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      In commit 0f7cc9a3 "tcp: increase throughput when reordering is high",
      it only allows cwnd to increase in Open state. This mistakenly disables
      slow start after timeout (CA_Loss). Moreover cwnd won't grow if the
      state moves from Disorder to Open later in tcp_fastretrans_alert().
      
      Therefore the correct logic should be to allow cwnd to grow as long
      as the data is received in order in Open, Loss, or even Disorder state.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      16edfe7e
  17. 04 9月, 2013 1 次提交
  18. 30 8月, 2013 2 次提交
    • E
      tcp: TSO packets automatic sizing · 95bd09eb
      Eric Dumazet 提交于
      After hearing many people over past years complaining against TSO being
      bursty or even buggy, we are proud to present automatic sizing of TSO
      packets.
      
      One part of the problem is that tcp_tso_should_defer() uses an heuristic
      relying on upcoming ACKS instead of a timer, but more generally, having
      big TSO packets makes little sense for low rates, as it tends to create
      micro bursts on the network, and general consensus is to reduce the
      buffering amount.
      
      This patch introduces a per socket sk_pacing_rate, that approximates
      the current sending rate, and allows us to size the TSO packets so
      that we try to send one packet every ms.
      
      This field could be set by other transports.
      
      Patch has no impact for high speed flows, where having large TSO packets
      makes sense to reach line rate.
      
      For other flows, this helps better packet scheduling and ACK clocking.
      
      This patch increases performance of TCP flows in lossy environments.
      
      A new sysctl (tcp_min_tso_segs) is added, to specify the
      minimal size of a TSO packet (default being 2).
      
      A follow-up patch will provide a new packet scheduler (FQ), using
      sk_pacing_rate as an input to perform optional per flow pacing.
      
      This explains why we chose to set sk_pacing_rate to twice the current
      rate, allowing 'slow start' ramp up.
      
      sk_pacing_rate = 2 * cwnd * mss / srtt
      
      v2: Neal Cardwell reported a suspect deferring of last two segments on
      initial write of 10 MSS, I had to change tcp_tso_should_defer() to take
      into account tp->xmit_size_goal_segs
      Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Cc: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Cc: Van Jacobson <vanj@google.com>
      Cc: Tom Herbert <therbert@google.com>
      Acked-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      95bd09eb
    • A
      tcp: don't apply tsoffset if rcv_tsecr is zero · e3e12028
      Andrew Vagin 提交于
      The zero value means that tsecr is not valid, so it's a special case.
      
      tsoffset is used to customize tcp_time_stamp for one socket.
      tsoffset is usually zero, it's used when a socket was moved from one
      host to another host.
      
      Currently this issue affects logic of tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts. Due to
      incorrect value of rcv_tsecr, tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts sets rto to
      TCP_RTO_MAX.
      
      Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
      Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
      Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
      Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
      Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
      Reported-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e3e12028
  19. 23 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • Y
      tcp: increase throughput when reordering is high · 0f7cc9a3
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      The stack currently detects reordering and avoid spurious
      retransmission very well. However the throughput is sub-optimal under
      high reordering because cwnd is increased only if the data is deliverd
      in order. I.e., FLAG_DATA_ACKED check in tcp_ack().  The more packet
      are reordered the worse the throughput is.
      
      Therefore when reordering is proven high, cwnd should advance whenever
      the data is delivered regardless of its ordering. If reordering is low,
      conservatively advance cwnd only on ordered deliveries in Open state,
      and retain cwnd in Disordered state (RFC5681).
      
      Using netperf on a qdisc setup of 20Mbps BW and random RTT from 45ms
      to 55ms (for reordering effect). This change increases TCP throughput
      by 20 - 25% to near bottleneck BW.
      
      A special case is the stretched ACK with new SACK and/or ECE mark.
      For example, a receiver may receive an out of order or ECN packet with
      unacked data buffered because of LRO or delayed ACK. The principle on
      such an ACK is to advance cwnd on the cummulative acked part first,
      then reduce cwnd in tcp_fastretrans_alert().
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0f7cc9a3
  20. 14 8月, 2013 1 次提交
    • Y
      tcp: reset reordering est. selectively on timeout · 74c181d5
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      On timeout the TCP sender unconditionally resets the estimated degree
      of network reordering (tp->reordering). The idea behind this is that
      the estimate is too large to trigger fast recovery (e.g., due to a IP
      path change).
      
      But for example if the sender only had 2 packets outstanding, then a
      timeout doesn't tell much about reordering. A sender that learns about
      reordering on big writes and loses packets on small writes will end up
      falsely retransmitting again and again, especially when reordering is
      more likely on big writes.
      
      Therefore the sender should only suspect that tp->reordering is too
      high if it could have gone into fast recovery with the (lower) default
      estimate.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      74c181d5
  21. 23 7月, 2013 4 次提交
    • Y
      tcp: use RTT from SACK for RTO · ed08495c
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      If RTT is not available because Karn's check has failed or no
      new packet is acked, use the RTT measured from SACK to estimate
      the RTO. The sender can continue to estimate the RTO during loss
      recovery or reordering event upon receiving non-partial ACKs.
      
      This also changes when the RTO is re-armed. Previously it is
      only re-armed when some data is cummulatively acknowledged (i.e.,
      SND.UNA advances), but now it is re-armed whenever RTT estimator
      is updated. This feature is particularly useful to reduce spurious
      timeout for buffer bloat including cellular carriers [1], and
      RTT estimation on reordering events.
      
      [1] "An In-depth Study of LTE: Effect of Network Protocol and
       Application Behavior on Performance", In Proc. of SIGCOMM 2013
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ed08495c
    • Y
      tcp: measure RTT from new SACK · 59c9af42
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Take RTT sample if an ACK selectively acks some sequences that
      have never been retransmitted. The Karn's algorithm does not apply
      even if that ACK (s)acks other retransmitted sequences, because it
      must been generated by an original but perhaps out-of-order packet.
      There is no ambiguity. In case when multiple blocks are newly
      sacked because of ACK losses the earliest block is used to
      measure RTT, similar to cummulative ACKs.
      
      Such RTT samples allow the sender to estimate the RTO during loss
      recovery and packet reordering events. It is still useful even with
      TCP timestamps. That's because during these events the SND.UNA may
      not advance preventing RTT samples from TS ECR (thus the FLAG_ACKED
      check before calling tcp_ack_update_rtt()).  Therefore this new
      RTT source is complementary to existing ACK and TS RTT mechanisms.
      
      This patch does not update the RTO. It is done in the next patch.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      59c9af42
    • Y
      tcp: prefer packet timing to TS-ECR for RTT · 5b08e47c
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      Prefer packet timings to TS-ecr for RTT measurements when both
      sources are available. That's because broken middle-boxes and remote
      peer can return packets with corrupted TS ECR fields. Similarly most
      congestion controls that require RTT signals favor timing-based
      sources as well. Also check for bad TS ECR values to avoid RTT
      blow-ups. It has happened on production Web servers.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5b08e47c
    • Y
      tcp: consolidate SYNACK RTT sampling · 375fe02c
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      The first patch consolidates SYNACK and other RTT measurement to use a
      central function tcp_ack_update_rtt(). A (small) bonus is now SYNACK
      RTT measurement happens after PAWS check, potentially reducing the
      impact of RTO seeding on bad TCP timestamps values.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      375fe02c
  22. 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • C
      tcp: introduce a per-route knob for quick ack · bcefe17c
      Cong Wang 提交于
      In previous discussions, I tried to find some reasonable heuristics
      for delayed ACK, however this seems not possible, according to Eric:
      
      	"ACKS might also be delayed because of bidirectional
      	traffic, and is more controlled by the application
      	response time. TCP stack can not easily estimate it."
      
      	"ACK can be incredibly useful to recover from losses in
      	a short time.
      
      	The vast majority of TCP sessions are small lived, and we
      	send one ACK per received segment anyway at beginning or
      	retransmits to let the sender smoothly increase its cwnd,
      	so an auto-tuning facility wont help them that much."
      
      and according to David:
      
      	"ACKs are the only information we have to detect loss.
      
      	And, for the same reasons that TCP VEGAS is fundamentally
      	broken, we cannot measure the pipe or some other
      	receiver-side-visible piece of information to determine
      	when it's "safe" to stretch ACK.
      
      	And even if it's "safe", we should not do it so that losses are
      	accurately detected and we don't spuriously retransmit.
      
      	The only way to know when the bandwidth increases is to
      	"test" it, by sending more and more packets until drops happen.
      	That's why all successful congestion control algorithms must
      	operate on explicited tested pieces of information.
      
      	Similarly, it's not really possible to universally know if
      	it's safe to stretch ACK or not."
      
      It still makes sense to enable or disable quick ack mode like
      what TCP_QUICK_ACK does.
      
      Similar to TCP_QUICK_ACK option, but for people who can't
      modify the source code and still wants to control
      TCP delayed ACK behavior. As David suggested, this should belong
      to per-path scope, since different pathes may want different
      behaviors.
      
      Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      Cc: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
      Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
      CC: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
      Signed-off-by: NCong Wang <amwang@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bcefe17c
  23. 13 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  24. 31 5月, 2013 4 次提交
  25. 26 5月, 2013 3 次提交
  26. 23 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • N
      tcp: bug fix in proportional rate reduction. · 35f079eb
      Nandita Dukkipati 提交于
      This patch is a fix for a bug triggering newly_acked_sacked < 0
      in tcp_ack(.).
      
      The bug is triggered by sacked_out decreasing relative to prior_sacked,
      but packets_out remaining the same as pior_packets. This is because the
      snapshot of prior_packets is taken after tcp_sacktag_write_queue() while
      prior_sacked is captured before tcp_sacktag_write_queue(). The problem
      is: tcp_sacktag_write_queue (tcp_match_skb_to_sack() -> tcp_fragment)
      adjusts the pcount for packets_out and sacked_out (MSS change or other
      reason). As a result, this delta in pcount is reflected in
      (prior_sacked - sacked_out) but not in (prior_packets - packets_out).
      
      This patch does the following:
      1) initializes prior_packets at the start of tcp_ack() so as to
      capture the delta in packets_out created by tcp_fragment.
      2) introduces a new "previous_packets_out" variable that snapshots
      packets_out right before tcp_clean_rtx_queue, so pkts_acked can be
      correctly computed as before.
      3) Computes pkts_acked using previous_packets_out, and computes
      newly_acked_sacked using prior_packets.
      Signed-off-by: NNandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
      Acked-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      35f079eb
  27. 20 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • Y
      tcp: remove bad timeout logic in fast recovery · 3e59cb0d
      Yuchung Cheng 提交于
      tcp_timeout_skb() was intended to trigger fast recovery on timeout,
      unfortunately in reality it often causes spurious retransmission
      storms during fast recovery. The particular sign is a fast retransmit
      over the highest sacked sequence (SND.FACK).
      
      Currently the RTO timer re-arming (as in RFC6298) offers a nice cushion
      to avoid spurious timeout: when SND.UNA advances the sender re-arms
      RTO and extends the timeout by icsk_rto. The sender does not offset
      the time elapsed since the packet at SND.UNA was sent.
      
      But if the next (DUP)ACK arrives later than ~RTTVAR and triggers
      tcp_fastretrans_alert(), then tcp_timeout_skb() will mark any packet
      sent before the icsk_rto interval lost, including one that's above the
      highest sacked sequence. Most likely a large part of scorebard will be
      marked.
      
      If most packets are not lost then the subsequent DUPACKs with new SACK
      blocks will cause the sender to continue to retransmit packets beyond
      SND.FACK spuriously. Even if only one packet is lost the sender may
      falsely retransmit almost the entire window.
      
      The situation becomes common in the world of bufferbloat: the RTT
      continues to grow as the queue builds up but RTTVAR remains small and
      close to the minimum 200ms. If a data packet is lost and the DUPACK
      triggered by the next data packet is slightly delayed, then a spurious
      retransmission storm forms.
      
      As the original comment on tcp_timeout_skb() suggests: the usefulness
      of this feature is questionable. It also wastes cycles walking the
      sack scoreboard and is actually harmful because of false recovery.
      
      It's time to remove this.
      Signed-off-by: NYuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNeal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
      Acked-by: NNandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3e59cb0d