Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 14 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 30 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 10 10月, 2014 4 次提交
    • S
      zram: use notify_free to account all free notifications · 015254da
      由 Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于 
      `notify_free' device attribute accounts the number of slot free
notifications and internally represents the number of zram_free_page()
calls.  Slot free notifications are sent only when device is used as a
swap device, hence `notify_free' is used only for swap devices.  Since
f4659d8e (zram: support REQ_DISCARD) ZRAM handles yet another one
free notification (also via zram_free_page() call) -- REQ_DISCARD
requests, which are sent by a filesystem, whenever some data blocks are
discarded.  However, there is no way to know the number of notifications
in the latter case.

Use `notify_free' to account the number of pages freed by
zram_bio_discard() and zram_slot_free_notify().  Depending on usage
scenario `notify_free' represents:

 a) the number of pages freed because of slot free notifications, which is
   equal to the number of swap_slot_free_notify() calls, so there is no
   behaviour change

 b) the number of pages freed because of REQ_DISCARD notifications
Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      015254da
    • M
      zram: report maximum used memory · 461a8eee
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Normally, zram user could get maximum memory usage zram consumed via
polling mem_used_total with sysfs in userspace.

But it has a critical problem because user can miss peak memory usage
during update inverval of polling.  For avoiding that, user should poll it
with shorter interval(ie, 0.0000000001s) with mlocking to avoid page fault
delay when memory pressure is heavy.  It would be troublesome.

This patch adds new knob "mem_used_max" so user could see the maximum
memory usage easily via reading the knob and reset it via "echo 0 >
/sys/block/zram0/mem_used_max".
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NDan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      461a8eee
    • M
      zram: zram memory size limitation · 9ada9da9
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Since zram has no control feature to limit memory usage, it makes hard to
manage system memrory.

This patch adds new knob "mem_limit" via sysfs to set up the a limit so
that zram could fail allocation once it reaches the limit.

In addition, user could change the limit in runtime so that he could
manage the memory more dynamically.

Initial state is no limit so it doesn't break old behavior.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo, per Sergey]
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: David Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9ada9da9
    • M
      zsmalloc: change return value unit of zs_get_total_size_bytes · 722cdc17
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      zs_get_total_size_bytes returns a amount of memory zsmalloc consumed with
*byte unit* but zsmalloc operates *page unit* rather than byte unit so
let's change the API so benefit we could get is that reduce unnecessary
overhead (ie, change page unit with byte unit) in zsmalloc.

Since return type is pages, "zs_get_total_pages" is better than
"zs_get_total_size_bytes".
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NDan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: <juno.choi@lge.com>
Cc: <seungho1.park@lge.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Seth Jennings <sjennings@variantweb.net>
Cc: David Horner <ds2horner@gmail.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      722cdc17
  7. 05 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • M
      block: disable entropy contributions for nonrot devices · b277da0a
      由 Mike Snitzer 提交于 
      Clear QUEUE_FLAG_ADD_RANDOM in all block drivers that set
QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT.

Historically, all block devices have automatically made entropy
contributions.  But as previously stated in commit e2e1a148 ("block: add
sysfs knob for turning off disk entropy contributions"):
    - On SSD disks, the completion times aren't as random as they
      are for rotational drives. So it's questionable whether they
      should contribute to the random pool in the first place.
    - Calling add_disk_randomness() has a lot of overhead.

There are more reliable sources for randomness than non-rotational block
devices.  From a security perspective it is better to err on the side of
caution than to allow entropy contributions from unreliable "random"
sources.
Signed-off-by: NMike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      b277da0a
  9. 30 8月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 07 8月, 2014 2 次提交
    • W
      zram: replace global tb_lock with fine grain lock · d2d5e762
      由 Weijie Yang 提交于 
      Currently, we use a rwlock tb_lock to protect concurrent access to the
whole zram meta table.  However, according to the actual access model,
there is only a small chance for upper user to access the same
table[index], so the current lock granularity is too big.

The idea of optimization is to change the lock granularity from whole
meta table to per table entry (table -> table[index]), so that we can
protect concurrent access to the same table[index], meanwhile allow the
maximum concurrency.

With this in mind, several kinds of locks which could be used as a
per-entry lock were tested and compared:

Test environment:
x86-64 Intel Core2 Q8400, system memory 4GB, Ubuntu 12.04,
kernel v3.15.0-rc3 as base, zram with 4 max_comp_streams LZO.

iozone test:
iozone -t 4 -R -r 16K -s 200M -I +Z
(1GB zram with ext4 filesystem, take the average of 10 tests, KB/s)

      Test       base      CAS    spinlock    rwlock   bit_spinlock
-------------------------------------------------------------------
 Initial write  1381094   1425435   1422860   1423075   1421521
       Rewrite  1529479   1641199   1668762   1672855   1654910
          Read  8468009  11324979  11305569  11117273  10997202
       Re-read  8467476  11260914  11248059  11145336  10906486
  Reverse Read  6821393   8106334   8282174   8279195   8109186
   Stride read  7191093   8994306   9153982   8961224   9004434
   Random read  7156353   8957932   9167098   8980465   8940476
Mixed workload  4172747   5680814   5927825   5489578   5972253
  Random write  1483044   1605588   1594329   1600453   1596010
        Pwrite  1276644   1303108   1311612   1314228   1300960
         Pread  4324337   4632869   4618386   4457870   4500166

To enhance the possibility of access the same table[index] concurrently,
set zram a small disksize(10MB) and let threads run with large loop
count.

fio test:
fio --bs=32k --randrepeat=1 --randseed=100 --refill_buffers
--scramble_buffers=1 --direct=1 --loops=3000 --numjobs=4
--filename=/dev/zram0 --name=seq-write --rw=write --stonewall
--name=seq-read --rw=read --stonewall --name=seq-readwrite
--rw=rw --stonewall --name=rand-readwrite --rw=randrw --stonewall
(10MB zram raw block device, take the average of 10 tests, KB/s)

    Test     base     CAS    spinlock    rwlock  bit_spinlock
-------------------------------------------------------------
seq-write   933789   999357   1003298    995961   1001958
 seq-read  5634130  6577930   6380861   6243912   6230006
   seq-rw  1405687  1638117   1640256   1633903   1634459
  rand-rw  1386119  1614664   1617211   1609267   1612471

All the optimization methods show a higher performance than the base,
however, it is hard to say which method is the most appropriate.

On the other hand, zram is mostly used on small embedded system, so we
don't want to increase any memory footprint.

This patch pick the bit_spinlock method, pack object size and page_flag
into an unsigned long table.value, so as to not increase any memory
overhead on both 32-bit and 64-bit system.

On the third hand, even though different kinds of locks have different
performances, we can ignore this difference, because: if zram is used as
zram swapfile, the swap subsystem can prevent concurrent access to the
same swapslot; if zram is used as zram-blk for set up filesystem on it,
the upper filesystem and the page cache also prevent concurrent access
of the same block mostly.  So we can ignore the different performances
among locks.
Acked-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NWeijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      d2d5e762
    • M
      zram: use size_t instead of u16 · 023b409f
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Some architectures (eg, hexagon and PowerPC) could use PAGE_SHIFT of 16
or more.  In these cases u16 is not sufficiently large to represent a
compressed page's size so use size_t.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: NWeijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Acked-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      023b409f
  13. 24 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 04 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • W
      zram: correct offset usage in zram_bio_discard · 38515c73
      由 Weijie Yang 提交于 
      We want to skip the physical block(PAGE_SIZE) which is partially covered
by the discard bio, so we check the remaining size and subtract it if
there is a need to goto the next physical block.

The current offset usage in zram_bio_discard is incorrect, it will cause
its upper filesystem breakdown.  Consider the following scenario:

On some architecture or config, PAGE_SIZE is 64K for example, filesystem
is set up on zram disk without PAGE_SIZE aligned, a discard bio leads to a
offset = 4K and size=72K, normally, it should not really discard any
physical block as it partially cover two physical blocks.  However, with
the current offset usage, it will discard the second physical block and
free its memory, which will cause filesystem breakdown.

This patch corrects the offset usage in zram_bio_discard.
Signed-off-by: NWeijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Acked-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      38515c73
  19. 08 4月, 2014 17 次提交
  21. 04 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 31 1月, 2014 9 次提交
    • M
      zram: remove zram->lock in read path and change it with mutex · e46e3315
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Finally, we separated zram->lock dependency from 32bit stat/ table
handling so there is no reason to use rw_semaphore between read and
write path so this patch removes the lock from read path totally and
changes rw_semaphore with mutex.  So, we could do

old:

  read-read: OK
  read-write: NO
  write-write: NO

Now:

  read-read: OK
  read-write: OK
  write-write: NO

The below data proves mixed workload performs well 11 times and there is
also enhance on write-write path because current rw-semaphore doesn't
support SPIN_ON_OWNER.  It's side effect but anyway good thing for us.

Write-related tests perform better (from 61% to 1058%) but read path has
good/bad(from -2.22% to 1.45%) but they are all marginal within stddev.

  CPU 12
  iozone -t -T -l 12 -u 12 -r 16K -s 60M -I +Z -V 0

  ==Initial write                ==Initial write
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg:  516189.16                avg:  839907.96
  std:   22486.53 (4.36%)        std:   47902.17 (5.70%)
  max:  546970.60                max:  909910.35
  min:  481131.54                min:  751148.38
  ==Rewrite                      ==Rewrite
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg:  509527.98                avg: 1050156.37
  std:   45799.94 (8.99%)        std:   40695.44 (3.88%)
  max:  611574.27                max: 1111929.26
  min:  443679.95                min:  980409.62
  ==Read                         ==Read
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg: 4408624.17                avg: 4472546.76
  std:  281152.61 (6.38%)        std:  163662.78 (3.66%)
  max: 4867888.66                max: 4727351.03
  min: 4058347.69                min: 4126520.88
  ==Re-read                      ==Re-read
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg: 4462147.53                avg: 4363257.75
  std:  283546.11 (6.35%)        std:  247292.63 (5.67%)
  max: 4912894.44                max: 4677241.75
  min: 4131386.50                min: 4035235.84
  ==Reverse Read                 ==Reverse Read
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg: 4565865.97                avg: 4485818.08
  std:  313395.63 (6.86%)        std:  248470.10 (5.54%)
  max: 5232749.16                max: 4789749.94
  min: 4185809.62                min: 3963081.34
  ==Stride read                  ==Stride read
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg: 4515981.80                avg: 4418806.01
  std:  211192.32 (4.68%)        std:  212837.97 (4.82%)
  max: 4889287.28                max: 4686967.22
  min: 4210362.00                min: 4083041.84
  ==Random read                  ==Random read
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg: 4410525.23                avg: 4387093.18
  std:  236693.22 (5.37%)        std:  235285.23 (5.36%)
  max: 4713698.47                max: 4669760.62
  min: 4057163.62                min: 3952002.16
  ==Mixed workload               ==Mixed workload
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg:  243234.25                avg: 2818677.27
  std:   28505.07 (11.72%)       std:  195569.70 (6.94%)
  max:  288905.23                max: 3126478.11
  min:  212473.16                min: 2484150.69
  ==Random write                 ==Random write
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg:  555887.07                avg: 1053057.79
  std:   70841.98 (12.74%)       std:   35195.36 (3.34%)
  max:  683188.28                max: 1096125.73
  min:  437299.57                min:  992481.93
  ==Pwrite                       ==Pwrite
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg:  501745.93                avg:  810363.09
  std:   16373.54 (3.26%)        std:   19245.01 (2.37%)
  max:  518724.52                max:  833359.70
  min:  464208.73                min:  765501.87
  ==Pread                        ==Pread
  records: 10                    records: 10
  avg: 4539894.60                avg: 4457680.58
  std:  197094.66 (4.34%)        std:  188965.60 (4.24%)
  max: 4877170.38                max: 4689905.53
  min: 4226326.03                min: 4095739.72
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e46e3315
    • M
      zram: remove workqueue for freeing removed pending slot · f614a9f4
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Commit a0c516cb ("zram: don't grab mutex in zram_slot_free_noity")
introduced free request pending code to avoid scheduling by mutex under
spinlock and it was a mess which made code lenghty and increased
overhead.

Now, we don't need zram->lock any more to free slot so this patch
reverts it and then, tb_lock should protect it.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f614a9f4
    • M
      zram: introduce zram->tb_lock · 92967471
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Currently, the zram table is protected by zram->lock but it's rather
coarse-grained lock and it makes hard for scalibility.

Let's use own rwlock instead of depending on zram->lock.  This patch
adds new locking so obviously, it would make slow but this patch is just
prepartion for removing coarse-grained rw_semaphore(ie, zram->lock)
which is hurdle about zram scalability.

Final patch in this patchset series will remove the lock from read-path
and change rw_semaphore with mutex in write path.  With bonus, we could
drop pending slot free mess in next patch.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      92967471
    • M
      zram: use atomic operation for stat · deb0bdeb
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Some of fields in zram->stats are protected by zram->lock which is
rather coarse-grained so let's use atomic operation without explict
locking.

This patch is ready for removing dependency of zram->lock in read path
which is very coarse-grained rw_semaphore.  Of course, this patch adds
new atomic operation so it might make slow but my 12CPU test couldn't
spot any regression.  All gain/lose is marginal within stddev.

  iozone -t -T -l 12 -u 12 -r 16K -s 60M -I +Z -V 0

  ==Initial write                ==Initial write
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg:  412875.17                avg:  415638.23
  std:   38543.12 (9.34%)        std:   36601.11 (8.81%)
  max:  521262.03                max:  502976.72
  min:  343263.13                min:  351389.12
  ==Rewrite                      ==Rewrite
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg:  416640.34                avg:  397914.33
  std:   60798.92 (14.59%)       std:   46150.42 (11.60%)
  max:  543057.07                max:  522669.17
  min:  304071.67                min:  316588.77
  ==Read                         ==Read
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg: 4147338.63                avg: 4070736.51
  std:  179333.25 (4.32%)        std:  223499.89 (5.49%)
  max: 4459295.28                max: 4539514.44
  min: 3753057.53                min: 3444686.31
  ==Re-read                      ==Re-read
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg: 4096706.71                avg: 4117218.57
  std:  229735.04 (5.61%)        std:  171676.25 (4.17%)
  max: 4430012.09                max: 4459263.94
  min: 2987217.80                min: 3666904.28
  ==Reverse Read                 ==Reverse Read
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg: 4062763.83                avg: 4078508.32
  std:  186208.46 (4.58%)        std:  172684.34 (4.23%)
  max: 4401358.78                max: 4424757.22
  min: 3381625.00                min: 3679359.94
  ==Stride read                  ==Stride read
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg: 4094933.49                avg: 4082170.22
  std:  185710.52 (4.54%)        std:  196346.68 (4.81%)
  max: 4478241.25                max: 4460060.97
  min: 3732593.23                min: 3584125.78
  ==Random read                  ==Random read
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg: 4031070.04                avg: 4074847.49
  std:  192065.51 (4.76%)        std:  206911.33 (5.08%)
  max: 4356931.16                max: 4399442.56
  min: 3481619.62                min: 3548372.44
  ==Mixed workload               ==Mixed workload
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg:  149925.73                avg:  149675.54
  std:    7701.26 (5.14%)        std:    6902.09 (4.61%)
  max:  191301.56                max:  175162.05
  min:  133566.28                min:  137762.87
  ==Random write                 ==Random write
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg:  404050.11                avg:  393021.47
  std:   58887.57 (14.57%)       std:   42813.70 (10.89%)
  max:  601798.09                max:  524533.43
  min:  325176.99                min:  313255.34
  ==Pwrite                       ==Pwrite
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg:  411217.70                avg:  411237.96
  std:   43114.99 (10.48%)       std:   33136.29 (8.06%)
  max:  530766.79                max:  471899.76
  min:  320786.84                min:  317906.94
  ==Pread                        ==Pread
  records: 50                    records: 50
  avg: 4154908.65                avg: 4087121.92
  std:  151272.08 (3.64%)        std:  219505.04 (5.37%)
  max: 4459478.12                max: 4435857.38
  min: 3730512.41                min: 3101101.67
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      deb0bdeb
    • M
      zram: remove unnecessary free · 874e3cdd
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Commit a0c516cb ("zram: don't grab mutex in zram_slot_free_noity")
introduced pending zram slot free in zram's write path in case of
missing slot free by memory allocation failure in zram_slot_free_notify
but it is not necessary because we have already freed the slot right
before overwriting.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      874e3cdd
    • M
      zram: delay pending free request in read path · 9b353db1
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Sergey reported we don't need to handle pending free request every I/O
so that this patch removes it in read path while we remain it in write
path.

Let's consider below example.

Swap subsystem ask to zram "A" block free by swap_slot_free_notify but
zram had been pended it without real freeing.  Swap subsystem allocates
"A" block for new data but request pended for a long time just handled
and zram blindly free new data on the "A" block.  :(

That's why we couldn't remove handle pending free request right before
zram-write.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9b353db1
    • M
      zram: fix race between reset and flushing pending work · da4a0412
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Dan and Sergey reported that there is a racy between reset and flushing
of pending work so that it could make oops by freeing zram->meta in
reset while zram_slot_free can access zram->meta if new request is
adding during the race window.

This patch moves flush after taking init_lock so it prevents new request
so that it closes the race.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      da4a0412
    • M
      zram: add copyright · 7bfb3de8
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Add my copyright to the zram source code which I maintain.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7bfb3de8
    • M
      zram: remove old private project comment · 49061236
      由 Minchan Kim 提交于 
      Remove the old private compcache project address so upcoming patches
should be sent to LKML because we Linux kernel community will take care.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      49061236