Leave the input fd at the data area.

It does not matter right now - but seeking at the end of it
certainly did not make sense.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Librarize the sample type and attr fetching from perf data file
headers so that we can also use it from perf trace.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <1250448997-30715-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

While toying with perf, I've noticed that perf record can
easily enter a busy loop when doing something as silly as:

    $ perf record -A ls

Yeah, do_read here really wants to read a known size, not being
able to should die(), not busy-loop ;)

That was the cause for the bug.
Signed-off-by: NPierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@intersec.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Brice Goglin reported that only the first result from a
multi-counter perf record --stat run is accurate, the
rest looks bogus.

A silly mistake made us re-read the first attribute for
every recorded attribute.
Reported-by: NBrice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Tested-by: NBrice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Cc: paulus@samba.org
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Create a structured file format that includes the full
perf_counter_attr and all its relevant counter IDs so that
the reporting program has full information.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>