- 15 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However, on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact, quite often they should just be discarded. Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path. For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops. In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due to race conditions. In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from suspending is not enabled. However, to preserve the existing behavior with respect to suspend-to-RAM, this only is done in the suspend-to-idle case and only if an SCI has occurred while suspended. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Revert commit eed4d47e (ACPI / sleep: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle) as it turned out to be premature and triggered a number of different issues on various systems. That includes, but is not limited to, premature suspend-to-RAM aborts on Dell XPS 13 (9343) reported by Dominik. The issue the commit in question attempted to address is real and will need to be taken care of going forward, but evidently more work is needed for this purpose. Reported-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Tissoires 提交于
Revert commit 77e9a4aa (ACPI / button: Change default behavior to lid_init_state=open) which changed the kernel's behavior on laptops that boot with closed lids and expect the lid switch state to be reported accurately by the kernel. If you boot or resume your laptop with the lid closed on a docking station while using an external monitor connected to it, both internal and external displays will light on, while only the external should. There is a design choice in gdm to only provide the greeter on the internal display when lit on, so users only see a gray area on the external monitor. Also, the cursor will not show up as it's by default on the internal display too. To "fix" that, users have to open the laptop once and close it once again to sync the state of the switch with the hardware state. Even if the "method" operation mode implementation can be buggy on some platforms, the "open" choice is worse. It breaks docking stations basically and there is no way to have a user-space hwdb to fix that. On the contrary, it's rather easy in user-space to have a hwdb with the problematic platforms. Then, libinput (1.7.0+) can fix the state of the lid switch for us: you need to set the udev property LIBINPUT_ATTR_LID_SWITCH_RELIABILITY to 'write_open'. When libinput detects internal keyboard events, it will overwrite the state of the switch to open, making it reliable again. Given that logind only checks the lid switch value after a timeout, we can assume the user will use the internal keyboard before this timeout expires. For example, such a hwdb entry is: libinput:name:*Lid Switch*:dmi:*svnMicrosoftCorporation:pnSurface3:* LIBINPUT_ATTR_LID_SWITCH_RELIABILITY=write_open Link: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782380 Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+ Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
This reverts commit ecb10b69. The only expected ACPI control method lid device's usage model is 1. Listen to the lid notification, 2. Evaluate _LID after being notified by BIOS, 3. Suspend the system (if users configure to do so) after seeing "close". It's not ensured that BIOS will notify OS after boot/resume, and it's not ensured that BIOS will always generate "open" event upon opening the lid. But there are 2 wrong usage models: 1. When the lid device is responsible for suspend/resume the system, userspace requires to see "open" event to be paired with "close" after the system is resumed, or it will suspend the system again. 2. When an external monitor connects to the laptop attached docks, userspace requires to see "close" event after the system is resumed so that it can determine whether the internal display should remain dark and the external display should be lit on. After we made default kernel behavior to be suitable for usage model 1, users of usage model 2 start to report regressions for such behavior change. Reversion of button.lid_init_state=method doesn't actually reverts to old default behavior as doing so can enter a regression loop, but facilitates users to work the reported regressions around with button.lid_init_state=method. Fixes: ecb10b69 (ACPI / button: Remove lid_init_state=method mode) Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+ Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195455 Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430259Tested-by: NSteffen Weber <steffen.weber@gmail.com> Tested-by: NJulian Wiedmann <julian.wiedmann@jwi.name> Reported-by: NJoachim Frieben <jfrieben@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI SCI (System Control Interrupt) is set up as a wakeup IRQ during suspend-to-idle transitions and, consequently, any events signaled through it wake up the system from that state. However, on some systems some of the events signaled via the ACPI SCI while suspended to idle should not cause the system to wake up. In fact, quite often they should just be discarded. Arguably, systems should not resume entirely on such events, but in order to decide which events really should cause the system to resume and which are spurious, it is necessary to resume up to the point when ACPI SCIs are actually handled and processed, which is after executing dpm_resume_noirq() in the system resume path. For this reasons, add a loop around freeze_enter() in which the platforms can process events signaled via multiplexed IRQ lines like the ACPI SCI and add suspend-to-idle hooks that can be used for this purpose to struct platform_freeze_ops. In the ACPI case, the ->wake hook is used for checking if the SCI has triggered while suspended and deferring the interrupt-induced system wakeup until the events signaled through it are actually processed sufficiently to decide whether or not the system should resume. In turn, the ->sync hook allows all of the relevant event queues to be flushed so as to prevent events from being missed due to race conditions. In addition to that, some ACPI code processing wakeup events needs to be modified to use the "hard" version of wakeup triggers, so that it will cause a system resume to happen on device-induced wakeup events even if the "soft" mechanism to prevent the system from suspending is not enabled (that also helps to catch device-induced wakeup events occurring during suspend transitions in progress). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
The mode is buggy, and lid_init__state=open is more useful than this mode, so this patch makes it deprecated. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
More and more platforms need the button.lid_init_state=open quirk. This patch sets it the default behavior. If a platform doesn't send lid open event or lid open event is lost due to the underlying system problems, then we can compare various combinations: 1. systemd/acpid is used to suspend system or not, systemd has a special logic forcing open event after resuming; 2. _LID returns a cached value or not. The result is as follows: 1. lid_init_state=method 1. cached 1. resumed by lid: (x) event=close (x) systemd=suspends again (x) acpid=suspends again (x) state=close 2. resumed by other: (o) event=close (x) systemd=suspends again (x) acpid=suspends again (o) state=close 2. non-cached 1. resumed by lid: (o) event=open (o) systemd=resumes (o) acpid=resumes (o) state=open 2. resumed by other: (o) event=close (x) systemd=suspends again (x) acpid=suspends again (o) state=close 2. lid_init_state=open 1. cached 1. resumed by lid: (o) event=open (o) systemd=resumes (o) acpid=resumes (x) state=close 2. resumed by other: (x) event=open (o) systemd=resumes (o) acpid=resumes (o) state=close 2. non-cached 1. resumed by lid: (o) event=open (o) systemd=resumes (o) acpid=resumes (o) state=open 2. resumed by other: (x) event=open (o) systemd=resumes (o) acpid=resumes (o) state=close 3. lid_init_state=ignore 1. cached 1. resumed by lid: (o) event=none (x) systemd=suspends again (o) acpid=resumes (x) state=close 2. resumed by other: (o) event=none (x) systemd=suspends again (o) acpid=resumes (o) state=close 2. non-cached 1. resumed by lid: (o) event=none (x) systemd=suspends again (o) acpid=resumes (o) state=open 2. resumed by other: (o) event=none (x) systemd=suspends again (o) acpid=resumes (o) state=close As a conclusion: 1. With systemd changed, lid_init_state=ignore has only one problem and the problem comes from an underlying issue, not userspace and kernel lid handling. 2. Without systemd changed, lid_init_state=open can be the default behavior as the pass ratio is not much worse than lid_init_state=ignore. 3. lid_init_state=method is buggy, we can have a separate patch to make it deprectated. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187271Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
On most platforms, _LID returning value, lid open/close events are all reliable, but there are exceptions. Some AML tables report wrong initial lid state [1], and some of them never report lid open state [2]. The usage model on such buggy platforms is: 1. The initial lid state returned from _LID is not reliable; 2. The lid open event is not reliable; 3. The lid close event is always reliable, used by the platform firmware to trigger OSPM power saving operations. This usage model is not compliant to the Linux SW_LID model as the Linux userspace is very strict to the reliability of the open events. In order not to trigger issues on such buggy platforms, the ACPI button driver currently implements a lid_init_state=open quirk to send additional "open" event after resuming. However, this is still not sufficient because: 1. Some special usage models (e.x., the dark resume scenario) cannot be supported by this mode. 2. If a "close" event is not used to trigger "suspend", then the subsequent "close" events cannot be seen by the userspace. So we need to stop sending the additional "open" event and switch the driver to lid_init_state=ignore mode and make sure the platform triggered events can be reliably delivered to the userspace. The userspace programs then can be changed to not to be strict to the "open" events on such buggy platforms. Why will the subsequent "close" events be lost? This is because the input layer automatically filters redundant events for switch events. Thus given that the buggy AML tables do not guarantee paired "open"/"close" events, the ACPI button driver currently is not able to guarantee that the platform triggered reliable events can be always be seen by the userspace via SW_LID. This patch adds a mechanism to insert lid events as a compensation for the platform triggered ones to form a complete event switches in order to make sure that the platform triggered events can always be reliably delivered to the userspace. This essentially guarantees that the platform triggered reliable "close" events will always be relibly delivered to the userspace. However this mechanism is not suitable for lid_init_state=open/method as it should not send the complement switch event for the unreliable initial lid state notification. 2 unreliable events can trigger unexpected behavior. Thus this patch only implements this mechanism for lid_init_state=ignore. Known issues: 1. Possible alternative approach This approach is based on the fact that Linux requires a switch event type for LID events. Another approach is to use key event type to implement ACPI lid events. With SW event type, since ACPI button driver inserts wrong lid events, there could be a potential issue that an "open" event issued from some AML update methods could result in a wrong "close" event to be delivered to the userspace. While using KEY event type, there is no such problem. However there may not be such a kind of real case, and if there is such a case, it is worked around in this patch as the complement switch event is only generated for "close" event in order to deliver the reliable "close" event to the userspace. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89211 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106151 # [1] Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106941 # [2] Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Suggested-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 03 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Tissoires 提交于
When we removed the procfs dir on error or if the driver is unbound, the two variables acpi_lid_dir and acpi_button_dir were not reset. On the next rebind, those static variables were not null and we couldn't re-register the device again. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Acked-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Linux userspace (systemd-logind) keeps on rechecking lid state when the lid state is closed. If it failed to update the lid state to open after boot/resume, the system suspending right after the boot/resume could be resulted. Graphics drivers also use the lid notifications to implment MODESET_ON_LID_OPEN option. Before the situation is improved from the userspace and from the graphics driver, users can simply configure ACPI button driver to send initial "open" lid state using button.lid_init_state=open to avoid such kind of issues. And our ultimate target should be making button.lid_init_state=ignore the default behavior. This patch implements the 2 options and keep the old behavior (button.lid_init_state=method). Link: https://lkml.org/2016/3/7/460 Link: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/2087Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
(Correct a wrong macro usage.) This patch simplies the code by merging some redundant code. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
The _LID control method's initial returning value is not reliable. The _LID control method is described to return the "current" lid state. However the word of "current" has ambiguity, many BIOSen return the lid state upon the last lid notification instead of returning the lid state upon the last _LID evaluation. There won't be difference when the _LID control method is evaluated during the runtime, the problem is its initial returning value. When the BIOSen implement this control method with cached value, the initial returning value is likely not reliable. There are simply so many examples retuning "close" as initial lid state (Link 1), sending this state to the userspace causes suspending right after booting/resuming. Since the lid state is implemented by the BIOSen, the kernel lid driver has no idea how it can be correct, this patch stops sending the initial lid state to the userspace to try to avoid sending the wrong lid state to the userspace to trigger such kind of wrong suspending. This actually reverts the following commit introduced for fixing a Novell bug: Commit: 23de5d9e Subject: ACPI: button: send initial lid state after add and resume Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89211 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106151 Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106941 Link: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=326814Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 08 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jarkko Nikula 提交于
There is no need to carry potentially outdated Free Software Foundation mailing address in file headers since the COPYING file includes it. Signed-off-by: NJarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
During system suspend mark ACPI buttons (other than the lid) as "suspended" and if in that state, report wakeup events on button events, but do not propagate those events up the stack. This prevents systems from being turned off after a button-triggered wakeup from the "freeze" sleep state. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77611 Tested-on: Acer Aspire S5, Toshiba Portege R500 Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
Commit 1696d9dc (ACPI: Remove the old /proc/acpi/event interface) removed ACPI Button event which originally was sent to userspace via /proc/acpi/event. This caused ACPI shutdown regression on gentoo in VirtualBox. Now ACPI events are sent to userspace via netlink, so add ACPI Button event back via netlink routine. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71721Reported-and-tested-by: NRichard Musil <richard.musil@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Cc: 3.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.11+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shuah Khan 提交于
The ACPI button driver defines acpi_button_resume() when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is defined. This results in the following compile error when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is undefined: drivers/acpi/button.c:85:8: error: ‘acpi_button_resume’ undeclared here (not in a function) Signed-off-by: NShuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
Button GPEs have been enabled in the acpi_wake_device_init() during boot and the button driver enables them for the second time. Consequently, it is necessary to do # echo disable > /sys/firmware/acpi/interrupts/gpeXXX twice in a row to disable those GPEs via sysfs. This patch is to remove the GPE enabling code from the button driver to avoid the problem. Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
Input layer provides input_set_capability() to set input device's event related bits. This patch is to use it to replace origin code. Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
It is quite some time that this one has been deprecated. Get rid of it. Should some really important user be overseen, it may be reverted and the userspace program worked on first, but it is time to do something to get rid of this old stuff... Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Acked-by: NMatthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
The only part of proc_dir_entry the code outside of fs/proc really cares about is PDE(inode)->data. Provide a helper for that; static inline for now, eventually will be moved to fs/proc, along with the knowledge of struct proc_dir_entry layout. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 25 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
This patch fixes following compiler warnings when build via make W=1: drivers/acpi/button.c:220:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_lid_notifier_register’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/acpi/button.c:226:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_lid_notifier_unregister’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/acpi/button.c:232:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘acpi_lid_open’ [-Wmissing-prototypes] Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver .remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
- 22 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 10 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
According to compiler warnings, several suspend/resume functions in ACPI drivers are not used for CONFIG_PM_SLEEP unset, so add #ifdefs to prevent them from being built in that case. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 01 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make the ACPI button driver define its PM callbacks through a struct dev_pm_ops object rather than by using legacy PM hooks in struct acpi_device_ops. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 23 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
Remove unused ACPI button procfs interface. Only /proc/acpi/button/lid/LID/state remains. Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 25 2月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If a button device had already been enabled to wake up the system from sleep states before the button driver saw it, the driver shouldn't disable the device's wakeup capability when being detached from the device. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> -
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field is only used by the PCI runtime PM code to "protect" devices from being prepared for generating wakeup signals more than once in a row. However, it really doesn't provide any protection, because (1) all of the functions it is supposed to protect use their own reference counters effectively ensuring that the device will be set up for generating wakeup signals just once and (2) the PCI runtime PM code uses wakeup.run_wake_count in a racy way, since nothing prevents acpi_dev_run_wake() from being called concurrently from two different threads for the same device. Remove the wakeup.run_wake_count ACPI device field which is unnecessary, confusing and used in a wrong way. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 07 1月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since ACPI buttons and lids can be configured to wake up the system from sleep states, report wakeup events from these devices. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are ACPI devices (buttons and the laptop lid) that can wake up the system from sleep states and have no "physical" companion devices. The ACPI subsystem uses two flags, wakeup.state.enabled and wakeup.flags.always_enabled, for handling those devices, but they are not accessible through the standard device wakeup infrastructure. User space can only control them via the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface that is not really convenient (e.g. the way in which devices are enabled to wake up the system is not portable between different systems, because it requires one to know the devices' "names" used in the system's ACPI tables). To address this problem, use standard device wakeup flags instead of the special ACPI flags for handling those devices. In particular, use device_set_wakeup_capable() to mark the ACPI wakeup devices during initialization and use device_set_wakeup_enable() to allow or disallow them to wake up the system from sleep states. Rework the /proc/acpi/wakeup interface to take these changes into account. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 07 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After the previous patch that introduced acpi_gpe_wakeup() and modified the ACPI suspend and wakeup code to use it, the third argument of acpi_{enable|disable}_gpe() and the GPE wakeup reference counter are not necessary any more. Remove them and modify all of the users of acpi_{enable|disable}_gpe() accordingly. Also drop GPE type constants that aren't used any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 18 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit 9630bdd9 (ACPI: Use GPE reference counting to support shared GPEs) the wakeup enable mask bits of GPEs are set as soon as the GPEs are enabled to wake up the system. Unfortunately, this leads to a regression reported by Michal Hocko, where a system is woken up from ACPI S5 by a device that is not supposed to do that, because the wakeup enable mask bit of this device's GPE is always set when acpi_enter_sleep_state() calls acpi_hw_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(), although it should only be set if the device is supposed to wake up the system from the target state. To work around this issue, rework the ACPI power management code so that GPEs are not enabled to wake up the system upfront, but only during a system state transition when the target state of the system is known. [Of course, this means that the reference counting of "wakeup" GPEs doesn't really make sense and it is sufficient to set/unset the wakeup mask bits for them during system sleep transitions. This will allow us to simplify the GPE handling code quite a bit, but that change is too intrusive for 2.6.35.] Fixes https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15951Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Reported-and-tested-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Use the run_wake flag to mark all devices for which run-time wake-up events may be generated by the platform. Introduce a new wake-up flag, always_enabled, for marking devices that should be permanently enabled to generate run-time events. Also, introduce a reference counter for run-wake devices and a function that will initialize all of the run-time wake-up fields for given device. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI GPEs may map to multiple devices. The current GPE interface only provides a mechanism for enabling and disabling GPEs, making it difficult to change the state of GPEs at runtime without extensive cooperation between devices. Add an API to allow devices to indicate whether or not they want their device's GPE to be enabled for both runtime and wakeup events. Remove the old GPE type handling entirely, which gets rid of various quirks, like the implicit disabling with GPE type setting. This requires a small amount of rework in order to ensure that non-wake GPEs are enabled by default to preserve existing behaviour. Based on patches from Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 16 12月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhao Yakui 提交于
On some laptops it will return NOTIFY_OK(non-zero) when calling the ACPI LID notifier. Then it is used as the result of ACPI LID resume function, which will complain the following warning message in course of suspend/resume: >PM: Device PNP0C0D:00 failed to resume: error 1 This patch is to eliminate the above warning message. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14782Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 13 10月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
If a call comes in to check the lid state but there's no lid device present, we should return -ENODEV. Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Barnes 提交于
Some drivers need to know when a lid event occurs and get the current status. This can be useful for when a platform firmware clobbers some hardware state at lid time, and a driver needs to restore things when the lid is opened again. Acked-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NEric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
-