Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 04 5月, 2011 2 次提交
    • D
      [CPUFREQ] use dynamic debug instead of custom infrastructure · 2d06d8c4
      由 Dominik Brodowski 提交于 
      With dynamic debug having gained the capability to report debug messages
also during the boot process, it offers a far superior interface for
debug messages than the custom cpufreq infrastructure. As a first step,
remove the old cpufreq_debug_printk() function and replace it with a call
to the generic pr_debug() function.

How can dynamic debug be used on cpufreq? You need a kernel which has
CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG enabled.

To enabled debugging during runtime, mount debugfs and

$ echo -n 'module cpufreq +p' > /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control

for debugging the complete "cpufreq" module. To achieve the same goal during
boot, append

	ddebug_query="module cpufreq +p"

as a boot parameter to the kernel of your choice.

For more detailled instructions, please see
Documentation/dynamic-debug-howto.txt
Signed-off-by: NDominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
      2d06d8c4
    • N
      [CPUFREQ] Fix _OSC UUID in pcc-cpufreq · 904cc1e6
      由 Naga Chumbalkar 提交于 
      UUID needs to be written out the way it is described in
Sec 18.5.124 of ACPI 4.0a Specification.

Platform firmware's use of this UUID/_OSC is optional, which is
why we didn't notice this bug earlier.
Signed-off-by: NNaga Chumbalkar <nagananda.chumbalkar@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
      904cc1e6
  3. 22 4月, 2011 4 次提交
    • P
      perf, x86: Update/fix Intel Nehalem cache events · f4929bd3
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Change the Nehalem cache events to use retired memory instruction counters
(similar to Westmere), this greatly improves the provided stats.

Using:

main ()
{
        int i;

        for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) {
                asm("mov (%%rsp), %%rbx;"
                    "mov %%rbx, (%%rsp);" : : : "rbx");
        }
}

We find:

 $ perf stat --repeat 10 -e instructions:u -e l1-dcache-loads:u -e l1-dcache-stores:u ./loop_1b_loads+stores
  Performance counter stats for './loop_1b_loads+stores' (10 runs):
      4,000,081,056 instructions:u           #      0.000 IPC ( +-   0.000% )
      4,999,502,846 l1-dcache-loads:u          ( +-   0.008% )
      1,000,034,832 l1-dcache-stores:u         ( +-   0.000% )
         1.565184942  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.005% )

The 5b is surprising - we'd expect 1b:

 $ perf stat --repeat 10 -e instructions:u -e r10b:u -e l1-dcache-stores:u ./loop_1b_loads+stores
  Performance counter stats for './loop_1b_loads+stores' (10 runs):
      4,000,081,054 instructions:u           #      0.000 IPC ( +-   0.000% )
      1,000,021,961 r10b:u                     ( +-   0.000% )
      1,000,030,951 l1-dcache-stores:u         ( +-   0.000% )
         1.565055422  seconds time elapsed   ( +-   0.003% )

Which this patch thus fixes.
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-q9rtru7b7840tws75xzboapv@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      f4929bd3
    • C
      perf, x86: P4 PMU - Don't forget to clear cpuc->active_mask on overflow · 1ea5a6af
      由 Cyrill Gorcunov 提交于 
      It's not enough to simply disable event on overflow the
cpuc->active_mask should be cleared as well otherwise counter
may stall in "active" even in real being already disabled (which
potentially may lead to the situation that user may not use this
counter further).

Don pointed out that:

 " I also noticed this patch fixed some unknown NMIs
   on a P4 when I stressed the box".
Tested-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDon Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303398203-2918-3-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      1ea5a6af
    • I
      x86, perf event: Turn off unstructured raw event access to offcore registers · b52c55c6
      由 Ingo Molnar 提交于 
      Andi Kleen pointed out that the Intel offcore support patches were merged
without user-space tool support to the functionality:

 |
 | The offcore_msr perf kernel code was merged into 2.6.39-rc*, but the
 | user space bits were not. This made it impossible to set the extra mask
 | and actually do the OFFCORE profiling
 |

Andi submitted a preliminary patch for user-space support, as an
extension to perf's raw event syntax:

 |
 | Some raw events -- like the Intel OFFCORE events -- support additional
 | parameters. These can be appended after a ':'.
 |
 | For example on a multi socket Intel Nehalem:
 |
 |    perf stat -e r1b7:20ff -a sleep 1
 |
 | Profile the OFFCORE_RESPONSE.ANY_REQUEST with event mask REMOTE_DRAM_0
 | that measures any access to DRAM on another socket.
 |

But this kind of usability is absolutely unacceptable - users should not
be expected to type in magic, CPU and model specific incantations to get
access to useful hardware functionality.

The proper solution is to expose useful offcore functionality via
generalized events - that way users do not have to care which specific
CPU model they are using, they can use the conceptual event and not some
model specific quirky hexa number.

We already have such generalization in place for CPU cache events,
and it's all very extensible.

"Offcore" events measure general DRAM access patters along various
parameters. They are particularly useful in NUMA systems.

We want to support them via generalized DRAM events: either as the
fourth level of cache (after the last-level cache), or as a separate
generalization category.

That way user-space support would be very obvious, memory access
profiling could be done via self-explanatory commands like:

  perf record -e dram ./myapp
  perf record -e dram-remote ./myapp

... to measure DRAM accesses or more expensive cross-node NUMA DRAM
accesses.

These generalized events would work on all CPUs and architectures that
have comparable PMU features.

( Note, these are just examples: actual implementation could have more
  sophistication and more parameter - as long as they center around
  similarly simple usecases. )

Now we do not want to revert *all* of the current offcore bits, as they
are still somewhat useful for generic last-level-cache events, implemented
in this commit:

  e994d7d2: perf: Fix LLC-* events on Intel Nehalem/Westmere

But we definitely do not yet want to expose the unstructured raw events
to user-space, until better generalization and usability is implemented
for these hardware event features.

( Note: after generalization has been implemented raw offcore events can be
  supported as well: there can always be an odd event that is marginally
  useful but not useful enough to generalize. DRAM profiling is definitely
  *not* such a category so generalization must be done first. )

Furthermore, PERF_TYPE_RAW access to these registers was not intended
to go upstream without proper support - it was a side-effect of the above
e994d7d2 commit, not mentioned in the changelog.

As v2.6.39 is nearing release we go for the simplest approach: disable
the PERF_TYPE_RAW offcore hack for now, before it escapes into a released
kernel and becomes an ABI.

Once proper structure is implemented for these hardware events and users
are offered usable solutions we can revisit this issue.
Reported-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1302658203-4239-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b52c55c6
    • A
      perf: Support Xeon E7's via the Westmere PMU driver · b2508e82
      由 Andi Kleen 提交于 
      There's a new model number public, 47, for Xeon E7 (aka Westmere EX).
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1303429715-10202-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      b2508e82
  5. 21 4月, 2011 2 次提交
  7. 20 4月, 2011 4 次提交
  9. 19 4月, 2011 5 次提交
  11. 18 4月, 2011 10 次提交
  13. 17 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 16 4月, 2011 2 次提交
    • J
      x86, amd: Disable GartTlbWlkErr when BIOS forgets it · 5bbc097d
      由 Joerg Roedel 提交于 
      This patch disables GartTlbWlk errors on AMD Fam10h CPUs if
the BIOS forgets to do is (or is just too old). Letting
these errors enabled can cause a sync-flood on the CPU
causing a reboot.

The AMD BKDG recommends disabling GART TLB Wlk Error completely.

This patch is the fix for

	https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33012

on my machine.
Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110415131152.GJ18463@8bytes.orgTested-by: NAlexandre Demers <alexandre.f.demers@gmail.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      5bbc097d
    • K
      x86, NUMA: Fix fakenuma boot failure · 7d6b4670
      由 KOSAKI Motohiro 提交于 
      Currently, numa=fake boot parameter is broken. If it's used,
kernel may panic due to devide by zero error depending on CPU
configuration

Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8104ad4c>] find_busiest_group+0x38c/0xd30
 [<ffffffff81086aff>] ? local_clock+0x6f/0x80
 [<ffffffff81050533>] load_balance+0xa3/0x600
 [<ffffffff81050f53>] idle_balance+0xf3/0x180
 [<ffffffff81550092>] schedule+0x722/0x7d0
 [<ffffffff81550538>] ? wait_for_common+0x128/0x190
 [<ffffffff81550a65>] schedule_timeout+0x265/0x320
 [<ffffffff81095815>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0x35/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff81550538>] ? wait_for_common+0x128/0x190
 [<ffffffff8109bb6c>] ? __lock_release+0x9c/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff815534e0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x40
 [<ffffffff815534e0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x30/0x40
 [<ffffffff81550540>] wait_for_common+0x130/0x190
 [<ffffffff81051920>] ? try_to_wake_up+0x510/0x510
 [<ffffffff8155067d>] wait_for_completion+0x1d/0x20
 [<ffffffff8107f36c>] kthread_create_on_node+0xac/0x150
 [<ffffffff81077bb0>] ? process_scheduled_works+0x40/0x40
 [<ffffffff8155045f>] ? wait_for_common+0x4f/0x190
 [<ffffffff8107a283>] __alloc_workqueue_key+0x1a3/0x590
 [<ffffffff81e0cce2>] cpuset_init_smp+0x6b/0x7b
 [<ffffffff81df3d07>] kernel_init+0xc3/0x182
 [<ffffffff8155d5e4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
 [<ffffffff81553cd4>] ? retint_restore_args+0x13/0x13
 [<ffffffff81df3c44>] ? start_kernel+0x400/0x400
 [<ffffffff8155d5e0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13

The divede by zero is caused by the following line,
group->cpu_power==0:

 kernel/sched_fair.c::update_sg_lb_stats()
        /* Adjust by relative CPU power of the group */
        sgs->avg_load = (sgs->group_load * SCHED_LOAD_SCALE) / group->cpu_power;

This regression was caused by commit e23bba60 ("x86-64, NUMA: Unify
emulated distance mapping") because it changes cpu -> node
mapping in the process of dropping fake_physnodes().

  old) all cpus are assinged node 0
  now) cpus are assigned round robin
       (the logic is implemented by numa_init_array())

  Note: The change in behavior only happens if the system doesn't
        have neither ACPI SRAT table nor AMD northbridge NUMA
	information.

Round robin assignment doesn't work because init_numa_sched_groups_power()
assumes all logical cpus in the same physical cpu share the same node
(then it only accounts for group_first_cpu()), and the simple round robin
breaks the above assumption.

Thus, this patch implements a reassignment of node-ids if buggy firmware
or numa emulation makes wrong cpu node map. Tt enforce all logical cpus
in the same physical cpu share the same node.
Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Shaohui Zheng <shaohui.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110415203928.1303.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      7d6b4670
  17. 15 4月, 2011 4 次提交
  19. 14 4月, 2011 6 次提交