Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 20 11月, 2018 3 次提交
    • E
      crypto: nhpoly1305 - add NHPoly1305 support · 26609a21
      由 Eric Biggers 提交于 
      Add a generic implementation of NHPoly1305, an ε-almost-∆-universal hash
function used in the Adiantum encryption mode.

CONFIG_NHPOLY1305 is not selectable by itself since there won't be any
real reason to enable it without also enabling Adiantum support.
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      26609a21
    • E
      crypto: chacha - add XChaCha12 support · aa762409
      由 Eric Biggers 提交于 
      Now that the generic implementation of ChaCha20 has been refactored to
allow varying the number of rounds, add support for XChaCha12, which is
the XSalsa construction applied to ChaCha12.  ChaCha12 is one of the
three ciphers specified by the original ChaCha paper
(https://cr.yp.to/chacha/chacha-20080128.pdf: "ChaCha, a variant of
Salsa20"), alongside ChaCha8 and ChaCha20.  ChaCha12 is faster than
ChaCha20 but has a lower, but still large, security margin.

We need XChaCha12 support so that it can be used in the Adiantum
encryption mode, which enables disk/file encryption on low-end mobile
devices where AES-XTS is too slow as the CPUs lack AES instructions.

We'd prefer XChaCha20 (the more popular variant), but it's too slow on
some of our target devices, so at least in some cases we do need the
XChaCha12-based version.  In more detail, the problem is that Adiantum
is still much slower than we're happy with, and encryption still has a
quite noticeable effect on the feel of low-end devices.  Users and
vendors push back hard against encryption that degrades the user
experience, which always risks encryption being disabled entirely.  So
we need to choose the fastest option that gives us a solid margin of
security, and here that's XChaCha12.  The best known attack on ChaCha
breaks only 7 rounds and has 2^235 time complexity, so ChaCha12's
security margin is still better than AES-256's.  Much has been learned
about cryptanalysis of ARX ciphers since Salsa20 was originally designed
in 2005, and it now seems we can be comfortable with a smaller number of
rounds.  The eSTREAM project also suggests the 12-round version of
Salsa20 as providing the best balance among the different variants:
combining very good performance with a "comfortable margin of security".

Note that it would be trivial to add vanilla ChaCha12 in addition to
XChaCha12.  However, it's unneeded for now and therefore is omitted.

As discussed in the patch that introduced XChaCha20 support, I
considered splitting the code into separate chacha-common, chacha20,
xchacha20, and xchacha12 modules, so that these algorithms could be
enabled/disabled independently.  However, since nearly all the code is
shared anyway, I ultimately decided there would have been little benefit
to the added complexity.
Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      aa762409
    • E
      crypto: chacha20-generic - add XChaCha20 support · de61d7ae
      由 Eric Biggers 提交于 
      Add support for the XChaCha20 stream cipher.  XChaCha20 is the
application of the XSalsa20 construction
(https://cr.yp.to/snuffle/xsalsa-20081128.pdf) to ChaCha20 rather than
to Salsa20.  XChaCha20 extends ChaCha20's nonce length from 64 bits (or
96 bits, depending on convention) to 192 bits, while provably retaining
ChaCha20's security.  XChaCha20 uses the ChaCha20 permutation to map the
key and first 128 nonce bits to a 256-bit subkey.  Then, it does the
ChaCha20 stream cipher with the subkey and remaining 64 bits of nonce.

We need XChaCha support in order to add support for the Adiantum
encryption mode.  Note that to meet our performance requirements, we
actually plan to primarily use the variant XChaCha12.  But we believe
it's wise to first add XChaCha20 as a baseline with a higher security
margin, in case there are any situations where it can be used.
Supporting both variants is straightforward.

Since XChaCha20's subkey differs for each request, XChaCha20 can't be a
template that wraps ChaCha20; that would require re-keying the
underlying ChaCha20 for every request, which wouldn't be thread-safe.
Instead, we make XChaCha20 its own top-level algorithm which calls the
ChaCha20 streaming implementation internally.

Similar to the existing ChaCha20 implementation, we define the IV to be
the nonce and stream position concatenated together.  This allows users
to seek to any position in the stream.

I considered splitting the code into separate chacha20-common, chacha20,
and xchacha20 modules, so that chacha20 and xchacha20 could be
enabled/disabled independently.  However, since nearly all the code is
shared anyway, I ultimately decided there would have been little benefit
to the added complexity of separate modules.
Reviewed-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Acked-by: NMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      de61d7ae
  3. 16 11月, 2018 2 次提交
  5. 09 11月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 05 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 28 9月, 2018 2 次提交
  11. 04 9月, 2018 2 次提交
  13. 31 5月, 2018 2 次提交
    • E
      crypto: x86/salsa20 - remove x86 salsa20 implementations · b7b73cd5
      由 Eric Biggers 提交于 
      The x86 assembly implementations of Salsa20 use the frame base pointer
register (%ebp or %rbp), which breaks frame pointer convention and
breaks stack traces when unwinding from an interrupt in the crypto code.
Recent (v4.10+) kernels will warn about this, e.g.

WARNING: kernel stack regs at 00000000a8291e69 in syzkaller047086:4677 has bad 'bp' value 000000001077994c
[...]

But after looking into it, I believe there's very little reason to still
retain the x86 Salsa20 code.  First, these are *not* vectorized
(SSE2/SSSE3/AVX2) implementations, which would be needed to get anywhere
close to the best Salsa20 performance on any remotely modern x86
processor; they're just regular x86 assembly.  Second, it's still
unclear that anyone is actually using the kernel's Salsa20 at all,
especially given that now ChaCha20 is supported too, and with much more
efficient SSSE3 and AVX2 implementations.  Finally, in benchmarks I did
on both Intel and AMD processors with both gcc 8.1.0 and gcc 4.9.4, the
x86_64 salsa20-asm is actually slightly *slower* than salsa20-generic
(~3% slower on Skylake, ~10% slower on Zen), while the i686 salsa20-asm
is only slightly faster than salsa20-generic (~15% faster on Skylake,
~20% faster on Zen).  The gcc version made little difference.

So, the x86_64 salsa20-asm is pretty clearly useless.  That leaves just
the i686 salsa20-asm, which based on my tests provides a 15-20% speed
boost.  But that's without updating the code to not use %ebp.  And given
the maintenance cost, the small speed difference vs. salsa20-generic,
the fact that few people still use i686 kernels, the doubt that anyone
is even using the kernel's Salsa20 at all, and the fact that a SSE2
implementation would almost certainly be much faster on any remotely
modern x86 processor yet no one has cared enough to add one yet, I don't
think it's worthwhile to keep.

Thus, just remove both the x86_64 and i686 salsa20-asm implementations.

Reported-by: syzbot+ffa3a158337bbc01ff09@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: NEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      b7b73cd5
    • O
      crypto: morus - Mark MORUS SIMD glue as x86-specific · 2808f173
      由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于 
      Commit 56e8e57f ("crypto: morus - Add common SIMD glue code for
MORUS") accidetally consiedered the glue code to be usable by different
architectures, but it seems to be only usable on x86.

This patch moves it under arch/x86/crypto and adds 'depends on X86' to
the Kconfig options and also removes the prompt to hide these internal
options from the user.
Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnacek@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      2808f173
  15. 19 5月, 2018 5 次提交
  17. 21 4月, 2018 1 次提交
    • N
      crypto: zstd - Add zstd support · d28fc3db
      由 Nick Terrell 提交于 
      Adds zstd support to crypto and scompress. Only supports the default
level.

Previously we held off on this patch, since there weren't any users.
Now zram is ready for zstd support, but depends on CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZSTD,
which isn't defined until this patch is in. I also see a patch adding
zstd to pstore [0], which depends on crypto zstd.

[0] lkml.kernel.org/r/9c9416b2dff19f05fb4c35879aaa83d11ff72c92.1521626182.git.geliangtang@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: NNick Terrell <terrelln@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      d28fc3db
  19. 16 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  21. 09 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  23. 03 3月, 2018 19 次提交