Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 09 7月, 2014 3 次提交
  5. 12 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 09 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      gpio: Add helpers for optional GPIOs · 29a1f233
      由 Thierry Reding 提交于 
      Introduce gpiod_get_optional() and gpiod_get_index_optional() helpers
that make it easier for drivers to handle optional GPIOs.

Currently in order to handle optional GPIOs, a driver needs to special
case error handling for -ENOENT, such as this:

	gpio = gpiod_get(dev, "foo");
	if (IS_ERR(gpio)) {
		if (PTR_ERR(gpio) != -ENOENT)
			return PTR_ERR(gpio);

		gpio = NULL;
	}

	if (gpio) {
		/* set up GPIO */
	}

With these new helpers the above is reduced to:

	gpio = gpiod_get_optional(dev, "foo");
	if (IS_ERR(gpio))
		return PTR_ERR(gpio);

	if (gpio) {
		/* set up GPIO */
	}

While at it, device-managed variants of these functions are also
provided.
Signed-off-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      29a1f233
  9. 03 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  11. 29 4月, 2014 5 次提交
  13. 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  15. 29 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 26 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 14 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      gpio: clamp returned values to the boolean range · 23600969
      由 Alexandre Courbot 提交于 
      Nothing prevents GPIO drivers from returning values outside the
boolean range, and as it turns out a few drivers are actually doing so.
These values were passed as-is to unsuspecting consumers and created
confusion.

This patch makes the internal _gpiod_get_raw_value() function return a
bool, effectively clamping the GPIO value to the boolean range no
matter what the driver does.

While we are at it, we also change the value parameter of
_gpiod_set_raw_value() to bool type before drivers start doing funny
things with it as well.

Another way to fix this would be to change the prototypes of the driver
interface to use bool directly, but this would require a huge
cross-systems patch so this simpler solution is preferred.

Changes since v1:
- Change local variable type to bool as well, use boolean values in
  code
- Also change prototype of open drain/open source setting functions
  since they are only called from _gpiod_set_raw_value()

This probably calls for a larger booleanization of gpiolib, but let's
keep that for a latter change - right now we need to address the issue
of non-boolean values returned by drivers.
Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      23600969
  21. 13 3月, 2014 2 次提交
    • M
      gpio / ACPI: Rework ACPI GPIO event handling · 6072b9dc
      由 Mika Westerberg 提交于 
      The current ACPI GPIO event handling code was never tested against real
hardware with functioning GPIO triggered events (at the time such hardware
wasn't available). Thus it misses certain things like requesting the GPIOs
properly, passing correct flags to the interrupt handler and so on.

This patch reworks ACPI GPIO event handling so that we:

 1) Use struct acpi_gpio_event for all GPIO signaled events.
 2) Switch to use GPIO descriptor API and request GPIOs by calling
    gpiochip_request_own_desc() that we added in a previous patch.
 3) Pass proper flags from ACPI GPIO resource to request_threaded_irq().

Also instead of open-coding the _AEI iteration loop we can use
acpi_walk_resources(). This simplifies the code a bit and fixes memory leak
that was caused by missing kfree() for buffer returned by
acpi_get_event_resources().

Since the remove path now calls gpiochip_free_own_desc() which takes GPIO
spinlock we need to call acpi_gpiochip_remove() outside of that lock
(analogous to acpi_gpiochip_add() path where the lock is released before
those funtions are called).
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      6072b9dc
    • M
      gpiolib: Allow GPIO chips to request their own GPIOs · 77c2d792
      由 Mika Westerberg 提交于 
      Sometimes it is useful to allow GPIO chips themselves to request GPIOs they
own through gpiolib API. One use case is ACPI ASL code that should be able
to toggle GPIOs through GPIO operation regions.

We can't use gpio_request() because it will pin the module to the kernel
forever (it calls try_module_get()). To solve this we move module refcount
manipulation to gpiod_request() and let __gpiod_request() handle the actual
request. This changes the sequence a bit as now try_module_get() is called
outside of gpio_lock (I think this is safe, try_module_get() handles
serialization it needs already).

Then we provide gpiolib internal functions gpiochip_request/free_own_desc()
that do the same as gpio_request() but don't manipulate module refrence
count. This allows the GPIO chip driver to request and free descriptors it
owns without being pinned to the kernel forever.
Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAlexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      77c2d792
  23. 07 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 13 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  27. 07 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  29. 08 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  31. 13 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  33. 12 12月, 2013 1 次提交
    • T
      kernfs: s/sysfs_dirent/kernfs_node/ and rename its friends accordingly · 324a56e1
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      kernfs has just been separated out from sysfs and we're already in
full conflict mode.  Nothing can make the situation any worse.  Let's
take the chance to name things properly.

This patch performs the following renames.

* s/sysfs_elem_dir/kernfs_elem_dir/
* s/sysfs_elem_symlink/kernfs_elem_symlink/
* s/sysfs_elem_attr/kernfs_elem_file/
* s/sysfs_dirent/kernfs_node/
* s/sd/kn/ in kernfs proper
* s/parent_sd/parent/
* s/target_sd/target/
* s/dir_sd/parent/
* s/to_sysfs_dirent()/rb_to_kn()/
* misc renames of local vars when they conflict with the above

Because md, mic and gpio dig into sysfs details, this patch ends up
modifying them.  All are sysfs_dirent renames and trivial.  While we
can avoid these by introducing a dummy wrapping struct sysfs_dirent
around kernfs_node, given the limited usage outside kernfs and sysfs
proper, I don't think such workaround is called for.

This patch is strictly rename only and doesn't introduce any
functional difference.

- mic / gpio renames were missing.  Spotted by kbuild test robot.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      324a56e1
  35. 09 12月, 2013 4 次提交
  37. 04 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  39. 03 12月, 2013 3 次提交
  41. 25 11月, 2013 4 次提交
  43. 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / driver core: Store an ACPI device pointer in struct acpi_dev_node · 7b199811
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device
associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion
device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it.  Introduce two
new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way,
ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the
ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account.
Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to
use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead.  For some of them who used to
pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET()
introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an
equivalent thing.

The main motivation for doing this is that there are things
represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid
ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as
power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform
device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions
in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the
lack of valid ACPI handles).  However, there are more reasons
why it may be useful.

First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking
than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more
difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node
and the new macros.  Second, the change should help to reduce (over
time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is
passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the
struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device,
because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly.
Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that
will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit
compiler directives to it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell
Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
      7b199811