1. 13 2月, 2015 6 次提交
    • M
      zram: remove init_lock in zram_make_request · 08eee69f
      Minchan Kim 提交于
      Admin could reset zram during I/O operation going on so we have used
      zram->init_lock as read-side lock in I/O path to prevent sudden zram
      meta freeing.
      
      However, the init_lock is really troublesome.  We can't do call
      zram_meta_alloc under init_lock due to lockdep splat because
      zram_rw_page is one of the function under reclaim path and hold it as
      read_lock while other places in process context hold it as write_lock.
      So, we have used allocation out of the lock to avoid lockdep warn but
      it's not good for readability and fainally, I met another lockdep splat
      between init_lock and cpu_hotplug from kmem_cache_destroy during working
      zsmalloc compaction.  :(
      
      Yes, the ideal is to remove horrible init_lock of zram in rw path.  This
      patch removes it in rw path and instead, add atomic refcount for meta
      lifetime management and completion to free meta in process context.
      It's important to free meta in process context because some of resource
      destruction needs mutex lock, which could be held if we releases the
      resource in reclaim context so it's deadlock, again.
      
      As a bonus, we could remove init_done check in rw path because
      zram_meta_get will do a role for it, instead.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
      Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      08eee69f
    • M
      zram: check bd_openers instead of bd_holders · 2b269ce6
      Minchan Kim 提交于
      bd_holders is increased only when user open the device file as FMODE_EXCL
      so if something opens zram0 as !FMODE_EXCL and request I/O while another
      user reset zram0, we can see following warning.
      
        zram0: detected capacity change from 0 to 64424509440
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180823, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180824, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180825, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180826, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180827, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180828, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180829, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180830, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180831, lost async page write
        Buffer I/O error on dev zram0, logical block 180832, lost async page write
        ------------[ cut here ]------------
        WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 1996 at fs/block_dev.c:57 __blkdev_put+0x1d7/0x210()
        Modules linked in:
        CPU: 11 PID: 1996 Comm: dd Not tainted 3.19.0-rc6-next-20150202+ #1125
        Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
        Call Trace:
          dump_stack+0x45/0x57
          warn_slowpath_common+0x8a/0xc0
          warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
          __blkdev_put+0x1d7/0x210
          blkdev_put+0x50/0x130
          blkdev_close+0x25/0x30
          __fput+0xdf/0x1e0
          ____fput+0xe/0x10
          task_work_run+0xa7/0xe0
          do_notify_resume+0x49/0x60
          int_signal+0x12/0x17
        ---[ end trace 274fbbc5664827d2 ]---
      
      The warning comes from bdev_write_node in blkdev_put path.
      
         static void bdev_write_inode(struct inode *inode)
         {
              spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
              while (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) {
                      spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
                      WARN_ON_ONCE(write_inode_now(inode, true)); <========= here.
                      spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
              }
              spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
         }
      
      The reason is dd process encounters I/O fails due to sudden block device
      disappear so in filemap_check_errors in __writeback_single_inode returns
      -EIO.
      
      If we check bd_openers instead of bd_holders, we could address the
      problem.  When I see the brd, it already have used it rather than
      bd_holders so although I'm not a expert of block layer, it seems to be
      better.
      
      I can make following warning with below simple script.  In addition, I
      added msleep(2000) below set_capacity(zram->disk, 0) after applying your
      patch to make window huge(Kudos to Ganesh!)
      
      script:
      
         echo $((60<<30)) > /sys/block/zram0/disksize
         setsid dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/zram0 &
         sleep 1
         setsid echo 1 > /sys/block/zram0/reset
      Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
      Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2b269ce6
    • S
      zram: rework reset and destroy path · a096cafc
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      We need to return set_capacity(disk, 0) from reset_store() back to
      zram_reset_device(), a catch by Ganesh Mahendran.  Potentially, we can
      race set_capacity() calls from init and reset paths.
      
      The problem is that zram_reset_device() is also getting called from
      zram_exit(), which performs operations in misleading reversed order -- we
      first create_device() and then init it, while zram_exit() perform
      destroy_device() first and then does zram_reset_device().  This is done to
      remove sysfs group before we reset device, so we can continue with device
      reset/destruction not being raced by sysfs attr write (f.e.  disksize).
      
      Apart from that, destroy_device() releases zram->disk (but we still have
      ->disk pointer), so we cannot acces zram->disk in later
      zram_reset_device() call, which may cause additional errors in the future.
      
      So, this patch rework and cleanup destroy path.
      
      1) remove several unneeded goto labels in zram_init()
      
      2) factor out zram_init() error path and zram_exit() into
         destroy_devices() function, which takes the number of devices to
         destroy as its argument.
      
      3) remove sysfs group in destroy_devices() first, so we can reorder
         operations -- reset device (as expected) goes before disk destroy and
         queue cleanup.  So we can always access ->disk in zram_reset_device().
      
      4) and, finally, return set_capacity() back under ->init_lock.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak comment]
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Reported-by: NGanesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
      Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a096cafc
    • S
      zram: fix umount-reset_store-mount race condition · ba6b17d6
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      Ganesh Mahendran was the first one who proposed to use bdev->bd_mutex to
      avoid ->bd_holders race condition:
      
              CPU0                            CPU1
      umount /* zram->init_done is true */
      reset_store()
      bdev->bd_holders == 0                   mount
      ...                                     zram_make_request()
      zram_reset_device()
      
      However, his solution required some considerable amount of code movement,
      which we can avoid.
      
      Apart from using bdev->bd_mutex in reset_store(), this patch also
      simplifies zram_reset_device().
      
      zram_reset_device() has a bool parameter reset_capacity which tells it
      whether disk capacity and itself disk should be reset.  There are two
      zram_reset_device() callers:
      
      -- zram_exit() passes reset_capacity=false
      -- reset_store() passes reset_capacity=true
      
      So we can move reset_capacity-sensitive work out of zram_reset_device()
      and perform it unconditionally in reset_store().  This also lets us drop
      reset_capacity parameter from zram_reset_device() and pass zram pointer
      only.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Reported-by: NGanesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
      Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ba6b17d6
    • G
      zram: free meta table in zram_meta_free · 1fec1172
      Ganesh Mahendran 提交于
      zram_meta_alloc() and zram_meta_free() are a pair.  In
      zram_meta_alloc(), meta table is allocated.  So it it better to free it
      in zram_meta_free().
      Signed-off-by: NGanesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      1fec1172
    • S
      zram: clean up zram_meta_alloc() · b8179958
      Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
      A trivial cleanup of zram_meta_alloc() error handling.
      Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
      Cc: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@vflare.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b8179958
  2. 28 1月, 2015 4 次提交
  3. 16 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 09 1月, 2015 6 次提交
  5. 03 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  6. 23 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 18 12月, 2014 2 次提交
  8. 14 12月, 2014 5 次提交
  9. 12 12月, 2014 5 次提交
  10. 11 12月, 2014 5 次提交
  11. 09 12月, 2014 4 次提交