drm/nouveau: Don't pm_runtime_put_sync(), only pm_runtime_put_autosuspend()
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.137 commit 92050011e09d30f0cf884e146b0d12f3b4286798 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I60PLB Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=92050011e09d30f0cf884e146b0d12f3b4286798 -------------------------------- commit c96cfaf8 upstream. While trying to fix another issue, it occurred to me that I don't actually think there is any situation where we want pm_runtime_put() in nouveau to be synchronous. In fact, this kind of just seems like it would cause issues where we may unexpectedly block a thread we don't expect to be blocked. So, let's only use pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(). Changes since v1: * Use pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), not pm_runtime_put() Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Fixes: 3a6536c5 ("drm/nouveau: Intercept ACPI_VIDEO_NOTIFY_PROBE") Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.10+ Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220714174234.949259-3-lyude@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录