From fb0d9dd2817b2caad87f63f925349a64c4138c31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Suzuki K Poulose Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 19:48:26 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Hide system instruction access to Trace registers [ Upstream commit 1d676673d665fd2162e7e466dcfbe5373bfdb73e ] Currently we advertise the ID_AA6DFR0_EL1.TRACEVER for the guest, when the trace register accesses are trapped (CPTR_EL2.TTA == 1). So, the guest will get an undefined instruction, if trusts the ID registers and access one of the trace registers. Lets be nice to the guest and hide the feature to avoid unexpected behavior. Even though this can be done at KVM sysreg emulation layer, we do this by removing the TRACEVER from the sanitised feature register field. This is fine as long as the ETM drivers can handle the individual trace units separately, even when there are differences among the CPUs. Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Catalin Marinas Cc: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210323120647.454211-2-suzuki.poulose@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang --- arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c index 8ea7c5ad7ab0..404eaa37238f 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c @@ -310,7 +310,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = { * of support. */ S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_PMUVER_SHIFT, 4, 0), - ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_TRACEVER_SHIFT, 4, 0), ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, ID_AA64DFR0_DEBUGVER_SHIFT, 4, 0x6), ARM64_FTR_END, }; -- GitLab