提交 f556faa4 编写于 作者: Q Qu Wenruo 提交者: David Sterba

btrfs: tree-checker: Check level for leaves and nodes

Although we have tree level check at tree read runtime, it's completely
based on its parent level.
We still need to do accurate level check to avoid invalid tree blocks
sneak into kernel space.

The check itself is simple, for leaf its level should always be 0.
For nodes its level should be in range [1, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1].
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NSu Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
上级 3d0174f7
......@@ -487,6 +487,13 @@ static int check_leaf(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *leaf,
u32 nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
int slot;
if (btrfs_header_level(leaf) != 0) {
generic_err(fs_info, leaf, 0,
"invalid level for leaf, have %d expect 0",
btrfs_header_level(leaf));
return -EUCLEAN;
}
/*
* Extent buffers from a relocation tree have a owner field that
* corresponds to the subvolume tree they are based on. So just from an
......@@ -645,9 +652,16 @@ int btrfs_check_node(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, struct extent_buffer *node)
unsigned long nr = btrfs_header_nritems(node);
struct btrfs_key key, next_key;
int slot;
int level = btrfs_header_level(node);
u64 bytenr;
int ret = 0;
if (level <= 0 || level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
generic_err(fs_info, node, 0,
"invalid level for node, have %d expect [1, %d]",
level, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1);
return -EUCLEAN;
}
if (nr == 0 || nr > BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(fs_info)) {
btrfs_crit(fs_info,
"corrupt node: root=%llu block=%llu, nritems too %s, have %lu expect range [1,%u]",
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册