提交 e390b55d 编写于 作者: D Daniel Borkmann 提交者: David S. Miller

bpf: make bpf_xdp_adjust_head support mandatory

Now that also the last in-tree user of the xdp_adjust_head bit has
been removed, we can remove the flag from struct bpf_prog altogether.

This, at the same time, also makes sure that any future driver for
XDP comes with bpf_xdp_adjust_head() support right away.

A rejection based on this flag would also mean that tail calls
couldn't be used with such driver as per c2002f98 ("bpf: fix
checking xdp_adjust_head on tail calls") fix, thus lets not allow
for it in the first place.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
上级 91ec701a
......@@ -413,8 +413,7 @@ struct bpf_prog {
locked:1, /* Program image locked? */
gpl_compatible:1, /* Is filter GPL compatible? */
cb_access:1, /* Is control block accessed? */
dst_needed:1, /* Do we need dst entry? */
xdp_adjust_head:1; /* Adjusting pkt head? */
dst_needed:1; /* Do we need dst entry? */
kmemcheck_bitfield_end(meta);
enum bpf_prog_type type; /* Type of BPF program */
u32 len; /* Number of filter blocks */
......
......@@ -3346,8 +3346,6 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
prog->dst_needed = 1;
if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32)
bpf_user_rnd_init_once();
if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_xdp_adjust_head)
prog->xdp_adjust_head = 1;
if (insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) {
/* If we tail call into other programs, we
* cannot make any assumptions since they can
......@@ -3355,7 +3353,6 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
* the program array.
*/
prog->cb_access = 1;
prog->xdp_adjust_head = 1;
/* mark bpf_tail_call as different opcode to avoid
* conditional branch in the interpeter for every normal
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册