提交 dda7aba1 编写于 作者: T Tejun Heo 提交者: Jeff Garzik

libata: improve HPA error handling

There's no point in retrying and eventually failing device detection
when the device rejects READ_NATIVE_MAX[_EXT].  Disable HPA unlocking
if READ_NATIVE_MAX[_EXT] is rejected as done when SET_MAX[_EXT] is
rejected.

This allows some old drives to work even if they aren't blacklisted.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
上级 1ffc151f
......@@ -1416,12 +1416,12 @@ static int ata_hpa_resize(struct ata_device *dev)
/* read native max address */
rc = ata_read_native_max_address(dev, &native_sectors);
if (rc) {
/* If HPA isn't going to be unlocked, skip HPA
* resizing from the next try.
/* If device aborted the command or HPA isn't going to
* be unlocked, skip HPA resizing.
*/
if (!ata_ignore_hpa) {
if (rc == -EACCES || !ata_ignore_hpa) {
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "HPA support seems "
"broken, will skip HPA handling\n");
"broken, skipping HPA handling\n");
dev->horkage |= ATA_HORKAGE_BROKEN_HPA;
/* we can continue if device aborted the command */
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册