提交 dbbe9127 编写于 作者: C Chris Wilson 提交者: Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Agnostic INTEL_INFO

Adapt the macro so that we can pass either the struct drm_device or the
struct drm_i915_private pointers and get the answer we want. Over time,
my plan is to convert all users over to using drm_i915_private and so
trimming down the pointer dance. Having spent a few hours chasing that
goal and achieved over 8k of object code saving, it appears to be a
worthwhile target. This interim macro allows us to slowly convert over.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Drop the (struct drm_device *) cast per the m-l discussion.
Also explain the seemingly unecessary first cast.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
上级 9bec9b13
...@@ -1596,6 +1596,9 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags) ...@@ -1596,6 +1596,9 @@ int i915_driver_load(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags)
if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET) && !dev->agp) if (!drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_MODESET) && !dev->agp)
return -EINVAL; return -EINVAL;
/* For the ugly agnostic INTEL_INFO macro */
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*dev_priv) == sizeof(*dev));
dev_priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_priv), GFP_KERNEL); dev_priv = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
if (dev_priv == NULL) if (dev_priv == NULL)
return -ENOMEM; return -ENOMEM;
......
...@@ -1981,7 +1981,10 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table { ...@@ -1981,7 +1981,10 @@ struct drm_i915_cmd_table {
int count; int count;
}; };
#define INTEL_INFO(p) (&to_i915(p)->info) /* Note that the (struct drm_i915_private *) cast is just to shut up gcc. */
#define __I915__(p) ((sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(struct drm_i915_private)) ? \
(struct drm_i915_private *)(p) : to_i915(p))
#define INTEL_INFO(p) (&__I915__(p)->info)
#define INTEL_DEVID(p) (INTEL_INFO(p)->device_id) #define INTEL_DEVID(p) (INTEL_INFO(p)->device_id)
#define IS_I830(dev) (INTEL_DEVID(dev) == 0x3577) #define IS_I830(dev) (INTEL_DEVID(dev) == 0x3577)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册