提交 d8db5fb0 编写于 作者: S Sven Eckelmann 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

batman-adv: Request iflink once in batadv_get_real_netdevice

stable inclusion
from stable-v5.10.104
commit 3dae11d21fc8aa57f389fd32ab884b638a04aff2
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I56XAC

Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=3dae11d21fc8aa57f389fd32ab884b638a04aff2

--------------------------------

commit 6116ba09 upstream.

There is no need to call dev_get_iflink multiple times for the same
net_device in batadv_get_real_netdevice. And since some of the
ndo_get_iflink callbacks are dynamic (for example via RCUs like in
vxcan_get_iflink), it could easily happen that the returned values are not
stable. The pre-checks before __dev_get_by_index are then of course bogus.

Fixes: 5ed4a460 ("batman-adv: additional checks for virtual interfaces on top of WiFi")
Signed-off-by: NSven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSimon Wunderlich <sw@simonwunderlich.de>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NYu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NWei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 c6bc47dc
......@@ -217,14 +217,16 @@ static struct net_device *batadv_get_real_netdevice(struct net_device *netdev)
struct net_device *real_netdev = NULL;
struct net *real_net;
struct net *net;
int ifindex;
int iflink;
ASSERT_RTNL();
if (!netdev)
return NULL;
if (netdev->ifindex == dev_get_iflink(netdev)) {
iflink = dev_get_iflink(netdev);
if (netdev->ifindex == iflink) {
dev_hold(netdev);
return netdev;
}
......@@ -234,9 +236,8 @@ static struct net_device *batadv_get_real_netdevice(struct net_device *netdev)
goto out;
net = dev_net(hard_iface->soft_iface);
ifindex = dev_get_iflink(netdev);
real_net = batadv_getlink_net(netdev, net);
real_netdev = dev_get_by_index(real_net, ifindex);
real_netdev = dev_get_by_index(real_net, iflink);
out:
if (hard_iface)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册