提交 d58b90c0 编写于 作者: S Sean Young 提交者: Zheng Zengkai

media: mceusb: sanity check for prescaler value

stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.21
commit 1aeaa0ea7df5dc03a8dc6b4bfd8ea13ce5c85f66
bugzilla: 50609

--------------------------------

commit 9dec0f48 upstream.

prescaler larger than 8 would mean the carrier is at most 152Hz,
which does not make sense for IR carriers.

Reported-by: syzbot+6d31bf169a8265204b8d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: NSean Young <sean@mess.org>
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
上级 8a1500f4
......@@ -701,11 +701,18 @@ static void mceusb_dev_printdata(struct mceusb_dev *ir, u8 *buf, int buf_len,
data[0], data[1]);
break;
case MCE_RSP_EQIRCFS:
if (!data[0] && !data[1]) {
dev_dbg(dev, "%s: no carrier", inout);
break;
}
// prescaler should make sense
if (data[0] > 8)
break;
period = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST((1U << data[0] * 2) *
(data[1] + 1), 10);
if (!period)
break;
carrier = (1000 * 1000) / period;
carrier = USEC_PER_SEC / period;
dev_dbg(dev, "%s carrier of %u Hz (period %uus)",
inout, carrier, period);
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册