提交 d4f1b103 编写于 作者: J Jike Song 提交者: Ingo Molnar

x86: clean up comments wrt. rd{msr|tsc|pmc}

The rdmsr instruction(et al) for i386 and x86-64 are semantically same.
The only difference is how gcc interpret constraint "A" for these targets.
Signed-off-by: NJike Song <albcamus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
上级 2011a067
......@@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ static inline unsigned long long native_read_tscp(unsigned int *aux)
}
/*
* i386 calling convention returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, while
* x86_64 returns at rax. Also, the "A" constraint does not really
* mean rdx:rax in x86_64, so we need specialized behaviour for each
* architecture
* both i386 and x86_64 returns 64-bit value in edx:eax, but gcc's "A"
* constraint has different meanings. For i386, "A" means exactly
* edx:eax, while for x86_64 it doesn't mean rdx:rax or edx:eax. Instead,
* it means rax *or* rdx.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
#define DECLARE_ARGS(val, low, high) unsigned low, high
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册