From d43b1b6f8e5b3219d4d02ea7fadcf67fecf78b1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Shilpasri G Bhat Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 14:01:47 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq : powernv: Report Pmax throttling if capped below nominal frequency Log a 'critical' message if the max frequency is reduced below nominal frequency. We already log 'info' message if the max frequency is capped below turbo frequency. CPU should guarantee atleast nominal frequency, but not turbo frequency in all system configurations and environments. So report the pmax throttling with severity when Pmax is dipped below nominal frequency. Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c index 64994e10638e..cb501386eb6e 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c @@ -327,8 +327,14 @@ static void powernv_cpufreq_throttle_check(void *data) if (chips[i].throttled) goto next; chips[i].throttled = true; - pr_info("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax reduced to %d\n", cpu, - chips[i].id, pmsr_pmax); + if (pmsr_pmax < powernv_pstate_info.nominal) + pr_crit("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax reduced below nominal frequency (%d < %d)\n", + cpu, chips[i].id, pmsr_pmax, + powernv_pstate_info.nominal); + else + pr_info("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax reduced below turbo frequency (%d < %d)\n", + cpu, chips[i].id, pmsr_pmax, + powernv_pstate_info.max); } else if (chips[i].throttled) { chips[i].throttled = false; pr_info("CPU %d on Chip %u has Pmax restored to %d\n", cpu, -- GitLab