ethtool: Add direct access to ops->get_sset_count
On 03/04/2010 09:26 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 00:51 -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote: >> From: Jeff Garzik<jgarzik@redhat.com> >> >> This patch is an alternative approach for accessing string >> counts, vs. the drvinfo indirect approach. This way the drvinfo >> space doesn't run out, and we don't break ABI later. > [...] >> --- a/net/core/ethtool.c >> +++ b/net/core/ethtool.c >> @@ -214,6 +214,10 @@ static noinline int ethtool_get_drvinfo(struct net_device *dev, void __user *use >> info.cmd = ETHTOOL_GDRVINFO; >> ops->get_drvinfo(dev,&info); >> >> + /* >> + * this method of obtaining string set info is deprecated; >> + * consider using ETHTOOL_GSSET_INFO instead >> + */ > > This comment belongs on the interface (ethtool.h) not the > implementation. Debatable -- the current comment is located at the callsite of ops->get_sset_count(), which is where an implementor might think to add a new call. Not all the numeric fields in ethtool_drvinfo are obtained from ->get_sset_count(). Hence the "some" in the attached patch to include/linux/ethtool.h, addressing your comment. > [...] >> +static noinline int ethtool_get_sset_info(struct net_device *dev, >> + void __user *useraddr) >> +{ > [...] >> + /* calculate size of return buffer */ >> + for (i = 0; i< 64; i++) >> + if (sset_mask& (1ULL<< i)) >> + n_bits++; > [...] > > We have a function for this: > > n_bits = hweight64(sset_mask); Agreed. I've attached a follow-up patch, which should enable my/Jeff's kernel patch to be applied, followed by this one. Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录