diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index b61482d354a29a671fa6e14c9631fc3a0f10d801..c561b986bab0ebf886000ea34e377ea789138a3b 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ struct bpf_insn_aux_data { struct bpf_map *map_ptr; /* pointer for call insn into lookup_elem */ }; int ctx_field_size; /* the ctx field size for load insn, maybe 0 */ - int converted_op_size; /* the valid value width after perceived conversion */ + bool seen; /* this insn was processed by the verifier */ }; #define MAX_USED_MAPS 64 /* max number of maps accessed by one eBPF program */ diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 308b0638ec5d58834e6352a4d67690796b7b61b7..d4593571c4049b8d046f53f81f8e17911a21e0c9 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -3827,6 +3827,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return err; regs = cur_regs(env); + env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true; if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { err = check_alu_op(env, insn); if (err) @@ -4022,6 +4023,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return err; insn_idx++; + env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true; } else { verbose(env, "invalid BPF_LD mode\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -4204,6 +4206,7 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 prog_len, u32 off, u32 cnt) { struct bpf_insn_aux_data *new_data, *old_data = env->insn_aux_data; + int i; if (cnt == 1) return 0; @@ -4213,6 +4216,8 @@ static int adjust_insn_aux_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 prog_len, memcpy(new_data, old_data, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * off); memcpy(new_data + off + cnt - 1, old_data + off, sizeof(struct bpf_insn_aux_data) * (prog_len - off - cnt + 1)); + for (i = off; i < off + cnt - 1; i++) + new_data[i].seen = true; env->insn_aux_data = new_data; vfree(old_data); return 0; @@ -4231,6 +4236,25 @@ static struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 of return new_prog; } +/* The verifier does more data flow analysis than llvm and will not explore + * branches that are dead at run time. Malicious programs can have dead code + * too. Therefore replace all dead at-run-time code with nops. + */ +static void sanitize_dead_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux_data = env->insn_aux_data; + struct bpf_insn nop = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0); + struct bpf_insn *insn = env->prog->insnsi; + const int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < insn_cnt; i++) { + if (aux_data[i].seen) + continue; + memcpy(insn + i, &nop, sizeof(nop)); + } +} + /* convert load instructions that access fields of 'struct __sk_buff' * into sequence of instructions that access fields of 'struct sk_buff' */ @@ -4557,6 +4581,9 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); free_states(env); + if (ret == 0) + sanitize_dead_code(env); + if (ret == 0) /* program is valid, convert *(u32*)(ctx + off) accesses */ ret = convert_ctx_accesses(env);