From aae9f312a9de1a923d29b0ac7ac7e556eb23750e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Borkmann Date: Sat, 8 May 2021 16:44:01 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] bpf: Refactor and streamline bounds check into helper mainline inclusion from mainline-v5.12-rc8 commit 073815b756c51ba9d8384d924c5d1c03ca3d1ae4 category: bugfix bugzilla: NA CVE: CVE-2021-29155 -------------------------------- Move the bounds check in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() into a small helper named sanitize_check_bounds() in order to simplify the former a bit. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Reviewed-by: John Fastabend Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Conflicts: kernel/bpf/verifier.c [yyl: bypass_spec_v1 is not introduced in kernel-4.19, use allow_ptr_leaks instead] Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang Reviewed-by: Kuohai Xu Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 7245cae1e1c4..f293bc3c61e7 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2911,6 +2911,72 @@ static int sanitize_err(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return -EACCES; } +/* check that stack access falls within stack limits and that 'reg' doesn't + * have a variable offset. + * + * Variable offset is prohibited for unprivileged mode for simplicity since it + * requires corresponding support in Spectre masking for stack ALU. See also + * retrieve_ptr_limit(). + * + * + * 'off' includes 'reg->off'. + */ +static int check_stack_access_for_ptr_arithmetic( + struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + int regno, + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg, + int off) +{ + if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) { + char tn_buf[48]; + + tnum_strn(tn_buf, sizeof(tn_buf), reg->var_off); + verbose(env, "R%d variable stack access prohibited for !root, var_off=%s off=%d\n", + regno, tn_buf, off); + return -EACCES; + } + + if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK) { + verbose(env, "R%d stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range, " + "prohibited for !root; off=%d\n", regno, off); + return -EACCES; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int sanitize_check_bounds(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + const struct bpf_insn *insn, + const struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg) +{ + u32 dst = insn->dst_reg; + + /* For unprivileged we require that resulting offset must be in bounds + * in order to be able to sanitize access later on. + */ + if (env->allow_ptr_leaks) + return 0; + + switch (dst_reg->type) { + case PTR_TO_STACK: + if (check_stack_access_for_ptr_arithmetic(env, dst, dst_reg, + dst_reg->off + dst_reg->var_off.value)) + return -EACCES; + break; + case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE: + if (check_map_access(env, dst, dst_reg->off, 1, false)) { + verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range, " + "prohibited for !root\n", dst); + return -EACCES; + } + break; + default: + break; + } + + return 0; +} + /* Handles arithmetic on a pointer and a scalar: computes new min/max and var_off. * Caller should also handle BPF_MOV case separately. * If we return -EACCES, caller may want to try again treating pointer as a @@ -3118,24 +3184,9 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, __reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg); __reg_bound_offset(dst_reg); - /* For unprivileged we require that resulting offset must be in bounds - * in order to be able to sanitize access later on. - */ - if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks) { - if (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE && - check_map_access(env, dst, dst_reg->off, 1, false)) { - verbose(env, "R%d pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range, " - "prohibited for !root\n", dst); - return -EACCES; - } else if (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK && - check_stack_access(env, dst_reg, dst_reg->off + - dst_reg->var_off.value, 1)) { - verbose(env, "R%d stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range, " - "prohibited for !root\n", dst); - return -EACCES; - } - } + if (sanitize_check_bounds(env, insn, dst_reg) < 0) + return -EACCES; return 0; } -- GitLab