serial: sifive: Report actual baud base rather than fixed 115200
stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.122 commit 47ebc50dc2a7d1e64a2268f6e21f62e1409d30e9 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5W6OE Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=47ebc50dc2a7d1e64a2268f6e21f62e1409d30e9 -------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 0a7ff843 ] The base baud value reported is supposed to be the highest baud rate that can be set for a serial port. The SiFive FU740-C000 SOC's on-chip UART supports baud rates of up to 1/16 of the input clock rate, which is the bus clock `tlclk'[1], often at 130MHz in the case of the HiFive Unmatched board. However the sifive UART driver reports a fixed value of 115200 instead: 10010000.serial: ttySIF0 at MMIO 0x10010000 (irq = 1, base_baud = 115200) is a SiFive UART v0 10011000.serial: ttySIF1 at MMIO 0x10011000 (irq = 2, base_baud = 115200) is a SiFive UART v0 even though we already support setting higher baud rates, e.g.: $ tty /dev/ttySIF1 $ stty speed 230400 The baud base value is computed by the serial core by dividing the UART clock recorded in `struct uart_port' by 16, which is also the minimum value of the clock divider supported, so correct the baud base value reported by setting the UART clock recorded to the input clock rate rather than 115200: 10010000.serial: ttySIF0 at MMIO 0x10010000 (irq = 1, base_baud = 8125000) is a SiFive UART v0 10011000.serial: ttySIF1 at MMIO 0x10011000 (irq = 2, base_baud = 8125000) is a SiFive UART v0 References: [1] "SiFive FU740-C000 Manual", v1p3, SiFive, Inc., August 13, 2021, Section 16.9 "Baud Rate Divisor Register (div)", pp.143-144 Signed-off-by: NMaciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk> Fixes: 1f1496a9 ("riscv: Fix sifive serial driver") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.2204291656280.9383@angie.orcam.me.ukSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NWei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录