block: use "precise_iostat" to switch accurate iostat account

hulk inclusion
category: bugfix
bugzilla: 187044, https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I5F2BY
CVE: NA

--------------------------------

There is io path like:
blk_mq_make_request
 blk_mq_bio_to_request
  blk_account_io_start
   part_round_stats
    part_in_flight
     /* controlled by precise_iostat, it also can calculated
	by atomic accumulation
      */
     blk_mq_in_flight
      blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter
       bt_for_each
        blk_mq_find_and_get_req
         blk_mq_tags_lock_irqsave
         ...
         blk_mq_tags_unlock_irqrestore
As we can see, there is a unnecessary locking operation in io path
which will affect concurrency performance. This problem was introduced
by "part_round_stats" and "part_in_flight" which using tag to account
inflight.

Fix it by using "precise_iostat" too, moving part_round_stats into
"precise_iostat", when "precise_iostat" is on, the iostat is accurate
and using atomic accumulation to account inflight. when it is off,
the io iostat will not be accurate.
Signed-off-by: NZhang Wensheng <zhangwensheng5@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NJason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Liu <liuyongqiang13@huawei.com>

block/bio.c

@@ -1689,7 +1689,10 @@ void generic_start_io_acct(struct request_queue *q, int op,
 	const int sgrp = op_stat_group(op);
 	int cpu = part_stat_lock();
 
-	part_round_stats(q, cpu, part);
+	if (precise_iostat)
+		part_round_stats(q, cpu, part);
+	else
+		update_io_ticks(cpu, part, jiffies, false);
 	part_stat_inc(cpu, part, ios[sgrp]);
 	part_stat_add(cpu, part, sectors[sgrp], sectors);
 	part_inc_in_flight(q, part, op_is_write(op));

block/blk-core.c

@@ -2864,7 +2864,10 @@ void blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq, bool new_io)
 		part_stat_inc(cpu, part, merges[rw]);
 	} else {
 		part = disk_map_sector_rcu(rq->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(rq));
-		part_round_stats(rq->q, cpu, part);
+		if (!precise_iostat)
+			update_io_ticks(cpu, part, jiffies, false);
+		else
+			part_round_stats(rq->q, cpu, part);
 		part_inc_in_flight(rq->q, part, rw);
 		rq->part = part;
 	}